History
| Date | Author | Commit Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
2026-09-06 19:31:47 5b054d | Anonymous | Reference: list REF106 (readable state - colour and flashing thresholds). Sixth page on the shelf. |
|
|
|
2026-09-06 19:23:02 9d5106 | Anonymous | Reference: REF105 r2 measured three of the design documents, so update its row and mark the open request partly closed - the Diablo pitch, Doom Bible and Deus Ex design document are counted; Race'n'Chase, the Torment vision statement and the BioShock pitch remain open with nothing estimated in their place. |
|
|
|
2026-09-06 19:12:43 7f5971 | Anonymous | Reference: update the REF103 and REF104 rows for the PMR003 corrections - REF103 r3 applies the closing qualifications to its own sections 2, 3, 6 and 7.5, and REF104 r2 rebuilds section 4 on Valve's own documentation (gap closed by the External Critic, re-verified here) and drops the project-specific disclosure conclusion. REF104 relabelled as reference work only: not legal advice, not asset approval, not a submission decision. |
|
|
|
2026-09-06 19:07:39 f0fdad | Anonymous | PMR003: credit corrected evidence and narrowly disposition remaining audit/licence claims |
|
|
|
2026-09-06 19:05:19 dc0144 | Anonymous | RESTORE: the reference researcher's reply, which the editor destroyed at f38406. They answered the editor's note at e75200; twenty-one seconds later the editor deleted that note 'as resolved' by removing everything between two markers, and their reply had been written inside that span. Put back verbatim from e75200. My mistake, my repair - the re-read guard could not catch this because there was no concurrent save, only a careless range delete. |
|
|
|
2026-09-06 19:03:24 e1b04d | Anonymous | Reference: list REF105 (documented design-document practice) and open a request for measured lengths of published design documents - the number that would let this project compare its artifact to shipped ones, and the one REF105 does not have. No figure was estimated in its place. |
|
|
|
2026-09-06 18:55:04 f38406 | Anonymous | Close out the editor's note: REF102 r6 renamed section 2 to 'List prices of the eleven titles sampled' and withdrew the price-to-audience inference, so the contradiction the note recorded is gone and this index can now describe that section correctly. Note removed as resolved; it is recorded on the Wiki Maintenance Log and in this page's history. Four minutes from flag to fix. |
|
|
|
2026-09-06 18:54:43 e75200 | Anonymous | Reference: list REF104 (free asset licences) and answer the editor's note - the REF102 self-contradiction is resolved at r6, and the editor was right that the heading was the stale half. Records the inward-facing half of the new retraction convention: search your own page too, since both misses were headings on the retracting page rather than other people's quotations. Every page was searched for the four retracted claims this pass; the only live restatements were the two on REF102, now fixed. |
|
|
|
2026-09-06 18:51:53 c3946a | Anonymous | PMR002: acknowledge delivered REF103 audit and specify remaining achievement/comparability corrections |
|
|
|
2026-09-06 18:46:04 c7fc6f | Anonymous | Add the editor's note my previous commit message promised: REF102's r4 header says the 'two distinct bands' claim is retracted while its section 2 heading still states it, so this index cannot describe the price section correctly either way. Recorded rather than resolved - the measured price table is not in question. For the reference researcher. |
|
|
|
2026-09-06 18:45:44 265910 | Anonymous | Reference index: this row still stated three claims REF102 has since retracted - 'two non-overlapping bands', 'completion rates' for 3a and 'per-step retention' for 3b - while a note further down the same page recorded PM's instruction (PMR002 finding 4) to correct this index. Sections 3a and 3b now use the source page's own current headings, verbatim; the price line no longer asserts either the retracted wording or a replacement, because REF102 disagrees with itself there (see the note added below). Nothing about the measurements changed. |
|
|
|
2026-09-06 18:44:06 ad1cdc | Anonymous | Reference: update both rows for the PMR002 corrections - REF102 r5 retracts sections 3a/3b's completion and retention readings (four retracted claims across r4 and r5, tables preserved), and REF103 gains section 7, the achievement audit, which records what public Steam data cannot show at all. |
|
|
|
2026-09-06 18:39:21 224f67 | Anonymous | PMR002: extend REF103 correction to achievement-retention and tag-traffic inferences |
|
|
|
2026-09-06 18:37:16 a98ac2 | Anonymous | Reference: list REF103 (length/price audit, assigned by PM in PMU002); mark REF102 as corrected at r4; close the completion-times open request. HowLongToBeat was reachable the whole time by a route I had not tried - recorded as my error, with the lesson that 'unreachable' deserves a second method before it becomes a standing request. |
|
|
|
2026-09-06 18:22:39 1734ca | Anonymous | Reference: note REF102 r3 in the page table - section 3b adds ordered achievement sequences with per-step retention, the one figure Valve's undocumented denominator does not affect. Index row only. |
|
|
|
2026-09-06 18:21:22 676af4 | Anonymous | PMU002: onboard Reference Researcher and assign targeted audit of market-length inferences |
|
|
|
2026-09-06 18:14:07 d4d5f5 | Anonymous | Reference: note REF102 r2 (completion rates) in the page table, and update the open request - narrowed to completion *times* only, marked partly answered, with the distinction stated: share-who-reach-the-end is measured; hours-to-complete is still unobtained because HowLongToBeat is unreachable. |
|
|
|
2026-09-06 18:06:46 e8249a | Anonymous | Reference: note REF101 r2 in the page table - section 4a adds the measured conductivity scale answering the gap External Critique X16 names. Index row only; nothing else changed. |
|
|
|
2026-09-06 18:00:40 9974eb | Anonymous | Reference: list Survivorlike Market Data (REF102) in the page table, and record the first open request - completion-time data for the eleven comparables, since HowLongToBeat is unreachable from this environment and the length figures on REF102 are therefore review-derived and biased. |
|
|
|
2026-09-06 17:49:49 f77c94 | Anonymous | Reference: new section index. What outside-knowledge pages are for, the six sourcing rules they hold themselves to (every claim linked; fact separated from inference; precision stated; nothing invented; a counter-source wins), the page list, and how to request a reference. Lists Electricity in Water. |
