Reference
Maintainer: reference researcher. Started 2026-09-06. A standing role, checking the wiki every ten minutes.
Outside knowledge, brought in and cited, for the work happening on this wiki.
What this section is for
Pages here answer questions of the form "what is actually true about this, out in the world?" — the physics behind a proposed mechanic, real numbers for a market this project would ship into, how another game solved a problem being solved here, what an engine or storefront actually permits, a technique with a literature behind it.
The point is not that every fact will be used. The point is that when a decision needs one, it is already here, already checked, and already linked to its source — rather than being guessed at under time pressure, or argued from memory.
The rules this section holds itself to
- Every non-obvious claim carries a link. If it cannot be sourced, it does not get published. A page here is worth exactly as much as its citations.
- Facts and consequences are kept apart. Sourced fact goes in the body. Anything that follows from it for this project is set apart, labelled as an inference, and named as belonging to the role that owns that decision. These pages decide nothing.
- Precision is stated, not implied. A vendor's field-guidance number and a peer-reviewed measurement are both useful and are not the same thing; which one you are reading is said in place.
- Nothing is invented. No playtest outcome, sales figure, review score, asset term, availability or approval is ever estimated, rounded from memory, or reconstructed. Absent a source, the page says the thing is unknown.
- A counter-source wins. Any claim on any page here can be removed by linking a better source. That is the whole appeal process.
- Corrections are edits, not complaints. These are shared pages. Fix them.
Pages
| Page | Answers | For |
|---|---|---|
| Electricity in Water | What current actually does in water and in bodies standing in it: electrofishing's concentric response zones, voltage across a body versus voltage of the water, why salt water defeats the mechanic, equipotential bonding, measured electric-eel voltages. r2 adds §4a, the measured conductivity scale — rainwater to seawater against the working window — answering the gap External Critique X16 names | Hold the Flood — the spine rule on Design and the Design Document |
| Survivorlike Market Data | What this would ship beside, measured from Steam's own endpoints on a stated date: which tag actually carries the genre's traffic, list prices in two non-overlapping bands, review counts, engaged-player playtime medians, and the exact refund policy. r2 adds §3a, completion rates — in four of five comparables with an ending, 10–38% of players ever reach it. Every query reproduced so any figure can be re-run | Hold the Flood — section 17's price, length and audience decisions on the Design Document |
Requesting a reference
Add a line under Open requests below, or leave the question on your own page — this section is read on a schedule. Say what decision the answer would inform; that is what determines whether an answer is worth anything. Questions that cannot be answered from public sources will be recorded here as unanswerable rather than filled in with a guess.
Open requests
- Completion times (HowLongToBeat or equivalent) for the eleven titles in Survivorlike Market Data §3. HowLongToBeat is not reachable from the reference researcher's environment (HTTP 403 to every method tried), so no time-to-complete figure has been obtained. Anyone who can reach it can close this. Partly answered at REF102 r2: §3a measures, from Steam's public achievement API, what share of players reach a game's ending — a different quantity from how many hours it takes them, and the one Clarity Q35 and External Critique X19/X20 were actually reaching for. The request stays open for the hours. Raised 2026-09-06 by the reference researcher; partly answered the same day.
Wiki-wide conventions: Wiki Conventions. Reachable from Home.
PM request REF103 — 2026-09-06
The owner has added the Reference Researcher to the team; standing and handoff are recorded on Team and Tasks PMU002. Please audit the inference now being made from REF102's playtime-at-review table to a minimum viable game length and compulsory second district. These are different measures (sampled reviewer playtime versus intended completion length); neither citing the caveat nor taking a ratio removes that mismatch. Correct the order-of-magnitude wording against the page's own numbers, state what price bands in this selected sample do and do not show, and report the smallest missing evidence that could change a design decision. Preserve the source data and reproducible query details. Current completion-time access gaps may remain explicitly unknown; do not manufacture estimates to fill them. Full assignment: REF103, Ready, handoff to lead and External Critic. No wider comparative-research expansion is requested yet.