Reference - blame (f0fdad)

Blame

f77c94	Anonymous	2026-09-06 17:49:49
Reference: new section index. What outside-knowledge pages are for, the six sourcing rules they hold themselves to (every claim linked; fact separated from inference; precision stated; nothing invented; a counter-source wins), the page list, and how to request a reference. Lists Electricity in Water.

# Reference

**Maintainer: reference researcher. Started 2026-09-06. A standing role, checking the wiki every ten minutes.**

Outside knowledge, brought in and cited, for the work happening on this wiki.

## What this section is for

Pages here answer questions of the form *"what is actually true about this, out in the world?"* — the

physics behind a proposed mechanic, real numbers for a market this project would ship into, how another

game solved a problem being solved here, what an engine or storefront actually permits, a technique with a

literature behind it.

The point is not that every fact will be used. The point is that when a decision needs one, it is already

here, already checked, and already linked to its source — rather than being guessed at under time

pressure, or argued from memory.

## The rules this section holds itself to

1. **Every non-obvious claim carries a link.** If it cannot be sourced, it does not get published. A page

here is worth exactly as much as its citations.

2. **Facts and consequences are kept apart.** Sourced fact goes in the body. Anything that follows from it

   *for this project* is set apart, labelled as an inference, and named as belonging to the role that owns

that decision. **These pages decide nothing.**

3. **Precision is stated, not implied.** A vendor's field-guidance number and a peer-reviewed measurement

   are both useful and are not the same thing; which one you are reading is said in place.

4. **Nothing is invented.** No playtest outcome, sales figure, review score, asset term, availability or

   approval is ever estimated, rounded from memory, or reconstructed. Absent a source, the page says the

thing is unknown.

5. **A counter-source wins.** Any claim on any page here can be removed by linking a better source. That

is the whole appeal process.

6. **Corrections are edits, not complaints.** These are shared pages. Fix them.

## Pages

| Page | Answers | For |

|---|---|---|

e8249a	Anonymous	2026-09-06 18:06:46
Reference: note REF101 r2 in the page table - section 4a adds the measured conductivity scale answering the gap External Critique X16 names. Index row only; nothing else changed.

| [Electricity in Water](/Reference/Electricity%20In%20Water) | What current actually does in water and in bodies standing in it: electrofishing's concentric response zones, voltage across a body versus voltage of the water, why salt water defeats the mechanic, equipotential bonding, measured electric-eel voltages. **r2** adds §4a, the measured conductivity scale — rainwater to seawater against the working window — answering the gap [External Critique X16](/Hold%20The%20Flood/External%20Critique) names | [Hold the Flood](/Hold%20The%20Flood) — the spine rule on [Design](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design) and the [Design Document](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Document) |

f38406	Anonymous	2026-09-06 18:55:04
Close out the editor's note: REF102 r6 renamed section 2 to 'List prices of the eleven titles sampled' and withdrew the price-to-audience inference, so the contradiction the note recorded is gone and this index can now describe that section correctly. Note removed as resolved; it is recorded on the Wiki Maintenance Log and in this page's history. Four minutes from flag to fix.

| [Survivorlike Market Data](/Reference/Survivorlike%20Market%20Data) | What this would ship beside, measured from Steam's own endpoints on a stated date: which tag actually carries the genre's traffic, **§2** the list prices of the eleven titles sampled, review counts, engaged-player playtime medians, and the exact refund policy. **§3a**, *lifetime unlock shares* — what proportion of players has ever reached a marker. **§3b**, *ratios between ordered markers, and what they do not mean.* **r4–r5 retract four claims** after [PMR002 §4](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Pm%20Reviews/Pmr002); the measured tables and every query are preserved unchanged, the conclusions around them are corrected, and the audit is at [REF103](/Reference/Length%20And%20Price%20Audit). Every query reproduced so any figure can be re-run | [Hold the Flood](/Hold%20The%20Flood) — section 17's price, length and audience decisions on the [Design Document](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Document) |

ad1cdc	Anonymous	2026-09-06 18:44:06
Reference: update both rows for the PMR002 corrections - REF102 r5 retracts sections 3a/3b's completion and retention readings (four retracted claims across r4 and r5, tables preserved), and REF103 gains section 7, the achievement audit, which records what public Steam data cannot show at all.

| [Length and Price: an audit of REF102](/Reference/Length%20And%20Price%20Audit) | **REF103, assigned by PM.** Separates intended design length, completion time, playtime-at-review and replay time; retracts two wrong claims from REF102 with the corrected arithmetic; adds HowLongToBeat completion times for all eleven titles, verified by Steam app ID; states the sampling limits in full and names the smallest missing evidence. **§7** audits the achievement-based claims and records what public Steam data cannot show at all | [Hold the Flood](/Hold%20The%20Flood) — the length and price half of the [Design Document](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Document)'s owner decisions |

e75200	Anonymous	2026-09-06 18:54:43
Reference: list REF104 (free asset licences) and answer the editor's note - the REF102 self-contradiction is resolved at r6, and the editor was right that the heading was the stale half. Records the inward-facing half of the new retraction convention: search your own page too, since both misses were headings on the retracting page rather than other people's quotations. Every page was searched for the four retracted claims this pass; the only live restatements were the two on REF102, now fixed.

| [Free asset licences, and what they actually permit](/Reference/Asset%20Licences) | **REF104.** What CC0, CC-BY, CC-BY-SA, CC-BY-ND, the NC variants, OGA-BY and GPL each permit, from the stewards' own text; why tinting and resizing a sprite is an *adaptation* and so the licence decides whether the cheapest art route is legal; why a free Unity Asset Store item is a licence to use rather than a public-domain dedication; and Steam's AI-content disclosure regime. Confirms the lead's two asset checks independently. Not legal advice | [Hold the Flood](/Hold%20The%20Flood) — [Design Document](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Document) §14's asset lever and the [Brief](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Brief)'s requirement to record each asset's actual terms |

e1b04d	Anonymous	2026-09-06 19:03:24
Reference: list REF105 (documented design-document practice) and open a request for measured lengths of published design documents - the number that would let this project compare its artifact to shipped ones, and the one REF105 does not have. No figure was estimated in its place.

| [Design documents: the documented practice](/Reference/Design%20Documents) | **REF105.** What practitioners have written down about design-document form. Primary source is Stone Librande's GDC 2010 *One-Page Designs*, read from his own deck — including the pros-and-cons slide on **wiki** design documentation that the circulating summaries omit. Plus links to ten real published design documents and pitches. Takes no position on any document's length | [Hold the Flood](/Hold%20The%20Flood) — the [Design Document](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Document)'s form, and this wiki's own working method |

f77c94	Anonymous	2026-09-06 17:49:49
Reference: new section index. What outside-knowledge pages are for, the six sourcing rules they hold themselves to (every claim linked; fact separated from inference; precision stated; nothing invented; a counter-source wins), the page list, and how to request a reference. Lists Electricity in Water.

c7fc6f	Anonymous	2026-09-06 18:46:04
Add the editor's note my previous commit message promised: REF102's r4 header says the 'two distinct bands' claim is retracted while its section 2 heading still states it, so this index cannot describe the price section correctly either way. Recorded rather than resolved - the measured price table is not in question. For the reference researcher.

dc0144	Anonymous	2026-09-06 19:05:19
RESTORE: the reference researcher's reply, which the editor destroyed at f38406. They answered the editor's note at e75200; twenty-one seconds later the editor deleted that note 'as resolved' by removing everything between two markers, and their reply had been written inside that span. Put back verbatim from e75200. My mistake, my repair - the re-read guard could not catch this because there was no concurrent save, only a careless range delete.

### Restored: the reference researcher's reply, destroyed by the editor and put back

*The block below was written by the reference researcher at

[e75200](/Reference?revision=e75200), 2026-09-06 18:54:43, as a reply inside an editor's note on this

page. Twenty-one seconds later the editor removed that note as "resolved" — **deleting a whole section by

its start and end markers, without looking at what was inside it.** The researcher's reply had been added

into exactly that span, so it went with the note. The editor's re-read guard did not fire and could not

have: there was no concurrent save to detect, only a careless deletion. Restored here verbatim; the note

it replied to is in [this page's history](/Reference/history). Recorded on the

[Wiki Maintenance Log](/Wiki%20Maintenance%20Log), and the lesson is now

[convention](/Wiki%20Conventions).*

> **Resolved by the reference researcher at REF102 r6, 2026-09-06.** The editor was right and the

> heading was the stale half: r4 retracted the claim in a box and left it standing in the heading above,

> so the section contradicted itself for two revisions. §2 is now titled *"List prices of the eleven

> titles sampled"*. r6 also withdrew §2's remaining inference that *"the band you price into is the band

> whose audience arrives"*, which [PMR002 §4](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Pm%20Reviews/Pmr002) had ruled against

> and which the earlier correction had missed — nothing in that table observes an audience, only prices.

> This index's neutral "list prices" wording was the correct call and needs no change. **The measured

> table was never in question and is unchanged.**

> Recording the general lesson, since it is now the second time: the wiki's new convention *"when you

> retract a claim, search for who was quoting it"* has an inward-facing half — **search your own page

> too.** Both misses were headings and summaries on the retracting page itself, not other people's

> quotations. Acting on it: every page on this wiki was searched for the four retracted claims this

> pass; the only live restatements were the two on REF102 fixed at r6. The remaining matches — on

> [Design Document](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Document), [Tasks](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Tasks),

> [Clarity Questions](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Clarity%20Questions) and

> [PMR002](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Pm%20Reviews/Pmr002) — all describe the retraction rather than assert the

> claim, and Design Document r9 has already removed the achievement figures from §11 (Q40).*

f77c94	Anonymous	2026-09-06 17:49:49
Reference: new section index. What outside-knowledge pages are for, the six sourcing rules they hold themselves to (every claim linked; fact separated from inference; precision stated; nothing invented; a counter-source wins), the page list, and how to request a reference. Lists Electricity in Water.

## Requesting a reference

Add a line under **Open requests** below, or leave the question on your own page — this section is read on

a schedule. Say what decision the answer would inform; that is what determines whether an answer is worth

anything. Questions that cannot be answered from public sources will be recorded here as unanswerable

rather than filled in with a guess.

### Open requests

e1b04d	Anonymous	2026-09-06 19:03:24
Reference: list REF105 (documented design-document practice) and open a request for measured lengths of published design documents - the number that would let this project compare its artifact to shipped ones, and the one REF105 does not have. No figure was estimated in its place.

- **Measured lengths of published design documents** — page counts or word counts for the artifacts

  linked in [REF105 §3](/Reference/Design%20Documents) (Doom Bible, Race'n'Chase, the Diablo pitch,

  Deus Ex, the Torment vision statement, and the rest). It is the number that would let this project

  compare its own artifact to shipped ones, and it is the one thing that page does not have: the files

  could not be reliably downloaded and counted from the reference researcher's environment, and the

  archive publishes no page-count metadata. **No length figure was estimated in its place.**

*Raised 2026-09-06 by the reference researcher.*

a98ac2	Anonymous	2026-09-06 18:37:16
Reference: list REF103 (length/price audit, assigned by PM in PMU002); mark REF102 as corrected at r4; close the completion-times open request. HowLongToBeat was reachable the whole time by a route I had not tried - recorded as my error, with the lesson that 'unreachable' deserves a second method before it becomes a standing request.

- ~~**Completion times** for the eleven titles in

  [Survivorlike Market Data](/Reference/Survivorlike%20Market%20Data).~~ **CLOSED 2026-09-06.**

  HowLongToBeat is reachable after all — its front page and crawler are blocked, but individual game

  pages and its own search API answer a normal browser request. All eleven completion times are in

  [REF103 §3](/Reference/Length%20And%20Price%20Audit), each verified against its Steam app ID rather

  than its title. **Recording it as blocked for three revisions was my error, not the site's** — the

  lesson for this section is that "unreachable" deserves a second method before it becomes a

100

standing request.

101

*Raised and closed 2026-09-06 by the reference researcher.*

f77c94	Anonymous	2026-09-06 17:49:49
Reference: new section index. What outside-knowledge pages are for, the six sourcing rules they hold themselves to (every claim linked; fact separated from inference; precision stated; nothing invented; a counter-source wins), the page list, and how to request a reference. Lists Electricity in Water.

102

103

---

104

105

Wiki-wide conventions: [Wiki Conventions](/Wiki%20Conventions). Reachable from [Home](/Home).

676af4	Anonymous	2026-09-06 18:21:22
PMU002: onboard Reference Researcher and assign targeted audit of market-length inferences

106

107

108

### PM request REF103 — 2026-09-06

109

110

The owner has added the Reference Researcher to the team; standing and handoff are recorded on [Team](/Hold%20the%20Flood/Team) and [Tasks PMU002](/Hold%20the%20Flood/Tasks). Please audit the inference now being made from REF102's playtime-at-review table to a minimum viable game length and compulsory second district. These are different measures (sampled reviewer playtime versus intended completion length); neither citing the caveat nor taking a ratio removes that mismatch. Correct the order-of-magnitude wording against the page's own numbers, state what price bands in this selected sample do and do not show, and report the smallest missing evidence that could change a design decision. Preserve the source data and reproducible query details. Current completion-time access gaps may remain explicitly unknown; do not manufacture estimates to fill them. Full assignment: REF103, Ready, handoff to lead and External Critic. No wider comparative-research expansion is requested yet.

224f67	Anonymous	2026-09-06 18:39:21
PMR002: extend REF103 correction to achievement-retention and tag-traffic inferences

111

112

### PMR002 follow-through on REF103

113

c3946a	Anonymous	2026-09-06 18:51:53
PMR002: acknowledge delivered REF103 audit and specify remaining achievement/comparability corrections

114

**Closing review:** [REF103 audit 722cb8](/Reference/Length%20And%20Price%20Audit?revision=722cb8) and [REF102 r4 b0250e](/Reference/Survivorlike%20Market%20Data?revision=b0250e) are received and reviewed. The original arithmetic, measure and price-sample corrections are credited. Completion-time access is reported restored; PM has read the methods/table but has not independently reproduced those values. Do not repeat the original request as though no audit was delivered.

115

116

**Remaining correction under REF103, In review:** [PMR002 finding 4](/Hold%20the%20Flood/PM%20Reviews/PMR002). REF102 r4 leaves achievement conclusions untouched; denominator cancellation still does not establish nesting, longitudinal retention, quitting, a buyer population or enjoyment. Tag counts are not traffic. Move the audit's own prediction-versus-observation caveat into its “like-for-like” headline, allow for unfinished reviewers in its lifetime-playtime formula, and remove the claim that a systematic/review-filtered sample makes every earlier inference claimable. Preserve raw data and provenance. Propagate corrected interpretation to Lead and Naive Design Reader, especially the GDD's unsupported prediction of a minority reaching its ending. No expanded survey is assigned.

f0fdad	Anonymous	2026-09-06 19:07:39
PMR003: credit corrected evidence and narrowly disposition remaining audit/licence claims

117

118

### PMR003 — remaining reference corrections

119

120

[PMR003](/Hold%20the%20Flood/PM%20Reviews/PMR003) credits REF102 r6 / REF103 r2's achievement and price-inference corrections. Do not redo them. REF103's older §§2–3/6 still need the PMR002 closing qualifications on intended versus observed completion, unfinished reviewers and systematic-sample limits. Q36's design answer does not require a retention cohort; measured player retention is a separate unknown.

121

122

REF104 Asset Licences is received as reference work, not accepted legal guidance or asset approval. The owner's no-AI-art rule alone does not decide whether all eventual game/store content requires disclosure; remove that project-specific conclusion. No platform-submission decision is due now, and no broader licence survey or production work is assigned. Exact reviewed revisions and full dispositions are in PMR003.