Blame
|
1 | # Hold The Horde — Progress |
||||||
| 2 | ||||||||
|
3 | **Paused for owner feedback. Updated 9 September 2026.** All three workers and automatic PM checks remain stopped. Design readiness has been reopened following the owner's review. |
||||||
|
4 | |||||||
|
5 | The owner identified three blocking problems: |
||||||
|
6 | |||||||
|
7 | 1. **Genre and scale:** the described encounters, builds and pacing do not deliver a survivorslike with hordes, spectacle and urgency. |
||||||
| 8 | 2. **Readable design:** the wiki is hard for a human to navigate and understand, with scattered explanations, unexplained references, old discussions and excessive qualifications. |
|||||||
| 9 | 3. **Player experience:** the design rarely explains what makes an event fun, exciting or challenging, how pressure and climaxes develop, or what the player is expected to feel and why. |
|||||||
|
10 | |||||||
|
11 | The PM accepts these as failures of the current design and its review standard. Consistency and coverage checks were insufficient grounds for declaring readiness. The earlier closure is a historical preparation milestone; the game direction and wiki now require correction. |
||||||
|
12 | |||||||
|
13 | **40 tracked outcomes: 37 preparation-closed, 1 reopened, 2 paused drafts, 0 active.** Earlier completed work remains available for reuse; this count measures documents and reviews, not game quality or percentage complete. |
||||||
|
14 | |||||||
|
15 | | Outcome | Current state | Next step | |
||||||
|
16 | |---|---|---| |
||||||
|
17 | | 38 — [Design readiness](/Hold%20The%20Flood/V1%20Readiness) | Reopened; M2 core and M3 first-pass wiki acceptance withdrawn | Resolve the three owner blockers before declaring readiness again | |
||||||
| 18 | | 39 — [Opening Mechanism Detail](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Opening%20Mechanism%20Detail) | Paused; submitted draft, unaccepted | Reassess whether its direction is useful after correction | |
|||||||
| 19 | | 40 — [Paired Transfer Discovery Detail](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Paired%20Transfer%20Discovery%20Detail) | Paused; submitted draft, unaccepted | Reassess whether its direction is useful after correction | |
|||||||
|
20 | |||||||
|
21 | **Proposed next delivery after explicit resumption:** a short revised pitch, one expedition showing pressure and release, three spectacular build examples, and a clear reading structure for the wiki. These are proposals for owner reaction before further detailed specification. No new assignment has been dispatched. |
||||||
|
22 | |||||||
|
23 | **Rough forecast:** one active working day for that correction proposal, then an estimated 2–4 additional working days for a readable first-pass revision after the owner selects the direction. Confidence is low; this estimates a coherent first pass, not exhaustive campaign detail. The team is paused, so no calendar deadline is running. Re-estimate after the proposal establishes how much mechanics/content must change. The previous detailed-campaign target of 10 November (20 October–1 December) is suspended and no longer a reliable baseline following this feedback. |
||||||
|
24 | |||||||
|
25 | The owner-confirmed brief remains authoritative. The five earlier unanswered choices remain open. No implementation or playtest is authorized. PM feedback recording does not resume the team. |
||||||
|
26 | |||||||
|
27 | |||||||
|
28 | Earlier reports and assessments remain in this page's revision history. |
||||||
