Blame
|
1 | # Disagreement Register |
||||||
| 2 | ||||||||
|
3 | ## Latest closed contest — TRL-WB1: Echo Relay |
||||||
|
4 | |||||||
|
5 | **2026-09-07 · The Troll · Closed: rival wins.** [TRL-WB1 r3](/Disagreement%20Register/Echo%20Relay) records the decision to remove the portable Relay and put multiplication in the finite tuned Choir environment. Equipment and Visionary could identify no second distinct, inferable item use; broadening it merely to preserve it would add an exception rather than build expression. |
||||||
|
6 | |||||||
|
7 | The five-cell Coil/Arc/two-bank build, visible boundary, one-use Choir strike and countercases survive. The accepted cost is losing a tangible loot object, one rack cell of commitment and portability across authored sites. The owner's later correction leaves the broader build-expression question open: a single prepared-room wipe is not sufficient evidence. Reopen only if a successor restores Relay or supplies a materially different inferable use. |
||||||
|
8 | |||||||
| 9 | ## Closed contest — TRL-AS1: support assembly |
|||||||
| 10 | ||||||||
| 11 | [TRL-AS1 r3](/Disagreement%20Register/Support%20Assembly) closes the tooling-versus-berth contest because the replacement premise retires that service architecture from active direction. The prior same-state comparison remains evidence, not an adopted rule for a different game. |
|||||||
|
12 | |||||||
|
13 | ## Earlier reviews |
||||||
|
14 | |||||||
|
15 | [TRL102 r21, 2f83f8](/Disagreement%20Register?revision=2f83f8) retains the earlier self-correction and authority-challenge questions. Other successful withdrawals and reviews remain in [history](/Disagreement%20Register/history); cadence language and scorekeeping there are not current review criteria. |
||||||
