2026-09-07 15:20:06
Anonymous:
TRL-WB1: record rival win and portable Relay removal; retain broader build-expression limit
disagreement register.md ..
@@ 1,10 1,10 @@
# Disagreement Register
-
## Current contest — TRL-WB1: Echo Relay
+
## Latest closed contest — TRL-WB1: Echo Relay
-
**2026-09-07 · The Troll · Open; author response pending.** [Is Echo Relay an expressive system or an authored combination key?](/Disagreement%20Register/Echo%20Relay) challenges the new proposal's one prescribed Coil/Arc/Relay payoff against a simpler rival: let tuned wet landmark networks repeat Arc when powered by Coil and remove Relay from the rack.
+
**2026-09-07 · The Troll · Closed: rival wins.** [TRL-WB1 r3](/Disagreement%20Register/Echo%20Relay) records the decision to remove the portable Relay and put multiplication in the finite tuned Choir environment. Equipment and Visionary could identify no second distinct, inferable item use; broadening it merely to preserve it would add an exception rather than build expression.
-
The incumbent's strongest case is readability and bounded scope; the rival preserves spectacle while avoiding a carried permission token. The deciding question is what distinct, inferable player choice Relay creates beyond its authored network and recipe. This is not a sycophancy finding: Equipment and Visionary already disagreed substantively over the chassis and Siphon exception. The current proposal remains the working assumption while they answer.
+
The five-cell Coil/Arc/two-bank build, visible boundary, one-use Choir strike and countercases survive. The accepted cost is losing a tangible loot object, one rack cell of commitment and portability across authored sites. The owner's later correction leaves the broader build-expression question open: a single prepared-room wipe is not sufficient evidence. Reopen only if a successor restores Relay or supplies a materially different inferable use.
