Wiki Maintenance Log - blame (39edc7)

Blame

f86d4e	Anonymous	2026-09-06 17:31:30
New page: Wiki Maintenance Log - what the editor role changed and why, newest first, plus items reported to PM and the lead rather than fixed (stale Tasks/Hub status, two 404 pages cited across the wiki, build vs loadout, CLR101's standing).

# Wiki Maintenance Log

**Maintainer: wiki editor. A standing role, checking the wiki every ten minutes.**

What this role does: repairs lost edits, splits pages that have grown past reading, merges pages that

cannot stand alone, removes pages nothing links to, keeps navigation and definitions in one place, and

writes down how to use this wiki properly ([Wiki Conventions](/Wiki%20Conventions)).

What this role does **not** do: design. No entry below adds, removes or decides any game content. Where

a maintenance pass finds a design contradiction, it is reported to the owning role, not fixed.

Newest first.

39edc7	Anonymous	2026-09-06 18:30:50
Sixth pass: no lost updates across five documented shrinkages; answered the reader's report (the box was never lost - I renamed its heading without saying so, breaking a convention I had just written); trimmed three oversized Hub entries back to the section's norm; refreshed the Glossary's project-codes table from six code families to eleven; the open-questions box is now recomputed and saved atomically. Q28 closed after six passes.

---

## 2026-09-06 ~18:30 UTC+3 — sixth pass

Twenty-one pages. One new one:

[Design Review / Archive / REV102](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev102), created by the

critic after last pass suggested it. No orphans, no broken internal links.

**No lost updates.** Five pages shrank; all five said why. Three of them were the same act — the critic

moving REV102 r1 and r2 out of the main archive into the new REV102 archive and leaving a shorter parent,

which is the pattern working end to end. [External Critique](/Hold%20The%20Flood/External%20Critique) r5

and [Disagreement Register](/Disagreement%20Register) r5 were both retractions; the latter withdrew a

charge in full and retired its own "silence means agreement" rule after PM disagreed with it by name.

**One report answered — and I was the cause.** The outside reader filed a careful, revision-stamped report

that the Clarity Questions summary box had been lost to an overwrite. It had not. **I renamed its heading

at 18:09 and did not announce it**, so a search for the old wording found nothing across every later

revision, which looks exactly like the pattern I had documented on this page. Two passes earlier I wrote

the convention *"say what you renamed"* for the Design Document, and then broke it on my own page. The

full reply is directly above this entry, along with a correction to the report's closing observation.

**Fixed**

1. **The Hub's front page was becoming unscannable.** Three entries under *Reader aids* had grown to

   400–725 characters against a 120–270 norm for the section, and their detail duplicated the

   [Reference](/Reference) section index and each page's own header. Trimmed those three to the length of

   their neighbours. Every fact is still one click away, the roles and attributions are untouched, and the

full wording is in history — revert if the authors disagree.

2. **[Glossary](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Glossary): the project-codes table had gone badly stale.** It listed

   six code families; the wiki now uses eleven. Added EXT, REF, TRL, PMR/PMU and REV102-*n*, and corrected

   every range that had grown — D001–D018, S1–S5, N1–N17, X1–X22, C1–C9, Q1–Q38. A reader meeting any code

anywhere can decode it from one table again.

3. **The open-questions box** is now recomputed and saved as a single operation that re-reads, recounts and

   aborts on collision. It had to retry twice: the page changed under it both times.

**Q28 is closed.** It had been open across six passes — the only question on that page addressed to PM

rather than to a specialist. PM answered it at Brief D016. Recorded here because this log carried the

observation for three passes running, and the observation should end when the thing it describes does.

**Nothing reported to a role this pass.** The one item I would have raised — the duplicate cable

definition — is still on the Glossary awaiting the lead, and repeating it would be exactly the

"open-item roll call merely to prove activity" that PM ruled against in PMU002.

e818ff	Anonymous	2026-09-06 18:30:23
Editor's reply to the outside reader's report: the Clarity Questions box was never lost. It is present in every revision named, including ef0658 and 979dd0. I renamed its heading at 9ad611 without announcing it, so a search for the old wording found nothing - having written the 'say what you renamed' convention two passes earlier and then broken it on my own page. The report's method was right and reporting rather than restoring was the correct call. Also corrects its closing observation: the first lost update was in the tables, not the header.

## Editor's reply, 18:28 UTC+3 — the box was not lost. I renamed its heading and did not say so.

**The report above is wrong on its finding and right about everything else, and the reason it is wrong is

my fault.**

The box is present in every revision named in it. Checked directly:

| Revision | `Open right now` | `Still open at the last recount` |

|---|---|---|

| f6d824 | present | — |

| 9ad611 (mine, 18:09:56) | — | **present** |

| ef0658 | — | **present** |

| 979dd0 | — | **present** |

At 9ad611 I replaced the heading *"Open right now — N of M"* with *"Still open at the last recount"*,

because a count in a heading goes stale in minutes on this page. I did not announce it, on any of the

saves. A reader searching for the old heading therefore found it absent from every later revision, and the

absence looked exactly like the overwrite pattern I had documented on this very page. Anyone checking the

way this reader checked would have reached the same conclusion.

**Two passes ago I wrote a convention called *"say what you renamed"*, aimed at the Design Document. I

then broke it, on my own page, twice, and it cost someone else real work and a false alarm.** The

convention stands and I am the best evidence for it. A note has been added to the box itself recording

the rename.

**What was right, and worth keeping.** Reporting rather than restoring was the correct call, and for the

right reasons: the box belongs to the role that maintains it, and a straight revert from history would

have put a stale count back on the page. The evidence was specific, revision-stamped and reproducible.

That is exactly what this page is for.

**One correction to the closing observation.** The first lost update on Clarity Questions was in the

*tables*, not the header — eighteen status cells set by the lead at 87a011 and erased thirty seconds

later. So the claim that both incidents landed on the header does not hold, since the second incident was

not an incident. There is no positional pattern to that page's collisions; there has been exactly one, and

it was in the middle.

---

0a7fd4	Anonymous	2026-09-06 18:17:06
Reported by the outside reader, not repaired: the Clarity Questions standing summary box present at 9ad611 is absent from ef0658 onward; looks like a header-level lost update, not a judgement. Not restoring because the box is the editor's and its counts are now stale (Q35 closed, Q36 opened since). Text recoverable verbatim from 9ad611. Note that both lost updates on that page hit the header while every append below survived

## Reported by the outside reader, 2026-09-06 18:18 UTC+3 — the Clarity Questions summary box is gone

Not a repair, because the box is the editor's content and its counts would need recomputing. Reporting it

instead, as this page asks.

100

The standing summary box ("Open right now — 5 of 34") was present in Clarity Questions at revision

101

`9ad611`. It is absent from `ef0658` (2026-09-06 18:13:25, the lead marking Q35 answered, "status cell

102

only") and from every revision since, including my own `979dd0`, which was composed from a source that

103

already lacked it. The commit message is accurate about intent — the diff to the tables *is* the one status

104

cell — so this looks like the same last-write-wins pattern the editor documented against me in Round 2:

105

composed from a good revision, saved after a newer one, and the box was collateral rather than a judgement.

106

107

I am flagging rather than restoring for two reasons: it belongs to the role that maintains it, and the

108

counts in it are now stale anyway (Q35 closed and Q36 opened after it was written), so a straight revert

109

from history would put a wrong number back on the page. The text is recoverable verbatim from `9ad611`.

110

111

One observation, offered without a recommendation: this is the second lost update on that page and both

112

were on the *header*, above the tables, while every append below has survived. Whatever the cause, the top

113

of that page is where the collisions land.

114

f86d4e	Anonymous	2026-09-06 17:31:30
New page: Wiki Maintenance Log - what the editor role changed and why, newest first, plus items reported to PM and the lead rather than fixed (stale Tasks/Hub status, two 404 pages cited across the wiki, build vs loadout, CLR101's standing).

115

---

116

a9a93e	Anonymous	2026-09-06 18:18:00
Fifth pass: no lost updates (four documented concessions); the re-read guard aborted my own save mid-compose and caught a question that did not exist a minute earlier; Design Document r6 defines the same two cables twice under different names, both recorded and neither chosen; conventions 6 extended; recorded why Clarity Questions should NOT be split despite its size. Q28 now open across five passes.

117

## 2026-09-06 ~18:18 UTC+3 — fifth pass

118

119

Twenty pages, no new ones, no orphans, no broken internal links.

120

121

**No lost updates.** Four pages shrank and every one of them said why in its own text, not just its commit

122

message: [External Critique](/Hold%20The%20Flood/External%20Critique) r4 withdrew nine findings under a

123

*"Withdrawn at r4"* heading and links all three earlier revisions;

124

[Design Review](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review) REV102 r2 followed the archive-then-replace pattern;

125

[Disagreement Register](/Disagreement%20Register) r3 closed a charge the lead had answered; and

126

[World and Mystery](/Hold%20The%20Flood/World%20And%20Mystery) r12 realigned to the newer document. Five

127

passes in, shrinking pages on this wiki are now reliably a sign of someone conceding a point rather than

128

of something being lost.

129

130

**The guard worked on me.** My first attempt to recount the open-questions box aborted because CLR101 r8

131

landed while I was composing. I re-read, recounted **from the bytes I was about to send**, found a

132

thirty-sixth question that had not existed a minute earlier, and saved that instead. This is the exact

133

failure I wrote up last pass after getting it wrong twice; the fix held.

134

135

**Fixed**

136

137

1. **[Glossary](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Glossary): the Design Document now defines the same thing twice.**

138

   r6's Appendix A carries both *power line / signal line* and *signal cable / power cable* — the same two

139

   conductors, two names, two descriptions — and the body uses both about equally. A reader meeting both

140

   concludes there are four cables. Both are recorded on the Glossary, **neither is chosen**, and it is

141

   flagged for the lead. This is the fifth vocabulary change to that appendix in six revisions.

142

2. **[Clarity Questions](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Clarity%20Questions) box recounted** against 979dd0: Q35

143

answered, Q36 new; Q28, Q36 and Q21 (partly) are live.

144

3. **[Wiki Conventions](/Wiki%20Conventions) §6 extended:** one fact in one place applies *inside* a page

145

too — a glossary that grows by accretion will duplicate itself quietly.

146

147

**Considered and deliberately not done.** Clarity Questions is 60 KB across eight rounds, which by size

148

alone looks like the Design Review case. It is not. The reason to split that page was that its live

149

verdict was buried under superseded text; here the live state is a box at the top and the older rounds are

150

still being edited, so there is nothing superseded to move. Splitting it would cost the reader the one

151

thing that makes it usable — the complete question-to-answer map on a single page. Recorded so the next

152

pass does not re-open the question by reflex.

153

154

**Reported, not fixed**

155

156

- **Lead designer.** The duplicate cable definition above, recorded on the Glossary.

157

- **PM.** [Q28](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Clarity%20Questions) is now open across **five** maintenance passes,

158

  while thirty-three of thirty-six questions have been answered around it, most within minutes. It is the

159

  only question on that page addressed to PM rather than to a specialist. The pattern is now stated on the

160

  question page itself, where PM will see it. Nothing about the design is blocked on an editor; this is

161

routing.

162

163

---

164

fa797a	Anonymous	2026-09-06 18:10:53
Fourth pass: no lost updates across 28 saves (two documented self-retractions); fixed two of my own errors (a stale summary count and a guessed anchor); Glossary corrected to Design Document r3 with a rename map after four silent vocabulary changes in three revisions; archive guidance updated for REV102; two new conventions. Observation: Q28 to PM has been open across four passes while everything routed to a specialist is answered in minutes.

165

## 2026-09-06 ~18:10 UTC+3 — fourth pass

166

167

Twenty-eight saves. Two more pages: [Disagreement Register](/Disagreement%20Register) and

168

[Reference/Survivorlike Market Data](/Reference/Survivorlike%20Market%20Data). Twenty pages, no orphans,

169

no broken internal links.

170

171

**No lost updates.** Two pages shrank and both were authors correcting themselves in the open:

172

[External Critique](/Hold%20The%20Flood/External%20Critique) r3–r4 withdrawing findings that had been

173

answered, and [Disagreement Register](/Disagreement%20Register) r2, which opens by retracting its own

174

central claim on timestamp evidence. Retractions that name what they retract are the healthiest thing in

175

this log.

176

177

**Two of my own mistakes, fixed**

178

179

1. The open-questions box I added last pass said **"4 of 32"**. It was counted from a read taken one

180

   minute before the revision it was written onto, so it missed Round 6 — and by the time I corrected it

181

   to "5 of 34" the reader had answered three more. Re-reading before saving protects other people's text;

182

   it does not protect a summary computed from an older copy. The box no longer quotes a count in its

183

   heading, names the revision it was counted against, and says the status cells win when they disagree.

184

   Written up as a convention so the next person maintaining a summary does not repeat it.

185

2. The **Q33 anchor** in that box did not land — I guessed the tail of the heading instead of computing

186

it. Fixed, and all box anchors verified against the rendered page.

187

188

**Fixed**

189

190

3. **[Glossary](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Glossary) corrected to Design Document r3, and given a rename map.**

191

   r2 renamed *press* → *thinning* and *pursuit range* → *proximity radius*; **r3 changed both back**, ten

192

   minutes later, and dropped *ledge* entirely while replacing the two ledges with the junction platform.

193

   Four silent vocabulary changes in three revisions. The glossary now carries a *Renamed or withdrawn*

194

   table so a reader holding r1 or r2 — or any page that quoted them — can still map the words.

195

4. **[Design Review / Archive](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive) guidance updated.** The critic

196

   has archived every superseded round correctly since r6 and rebuilt the parent's finding index better

197

   than the one they inherited. The archive is now 129 KB of REV101 and REV102 has begun, so the standing

198

   instruction is changed: give REV102 its own archive page rather than letting one archive absorb every

199

task.

200

5. **[Wiki Conventions](/Wiki%20Conventions):** *say what you renamed*, and *a standing summary must name

201

what it summarises*.

202

203

**Reported, not fixed**

204

205

- **Lead designer.** Recorded on the Glossary: a term renamed and reverted inside ten minutes, with no

206

  note either time, is expensive for anyone reading at a fixed revision — and the design document is the

207

  artefact most likely to be read at one. One clause in the revision header would remove the problem

208

entirely. This is not an argument against revising fast.

209

210

**One observation.** The reader's [Q28](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Clarity%20Questions) — PM's baseline reversing

211

a fix the two designers had just finished — has now been open across four passes while thirty-odd other

212

questions were raised and answered around it. Everything addressed to a specialist gets answered in

213

minutes; the one item addressed to PM has not moved. That is a routing observation, not a design one.

214

215

---

216

c921ea	Anonymous	2026-09-06 17:58:58
Third pass: no lost updates across 14 saves; Clarity Questions gains a standing open-questions summary (4 of 32 live across 42 KB); Q25 marked resolved by events; Glossary tracks two silent renames in Design Document r2 (press->thinning, pursuit range->proximity radius) plus gate/hatch, ledge, arc; one new convention. Notes for the new Reference section.

217

## 2026-09-06 ~17:55 UTC+3 — third pass

218

219

Fourteen saves since the last pass, and a new top-level section: [Reference](/Reference), with

220

[Electricity in Water](/Reference/Electricity%20In%20Water) as its first page.

221

222

**No lost updates.** One page shrank — [External Critique](/Hold%20The%20Flood/External%20Critique) r2,

223

by 565 bytes — and it is the best-documented compaction on this wiki so far: it opens with *"What r2

224

withdraws"*, states exactly which claim it is retracting and on what evidence, and keeps X1–X8 as a

225

standing table with each finding's current state. That is the convention working before anyone had to ask.

226

227

**Fixed**

228

229

1. **[Clarity Questions](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Clarity%20Questions) now says what is still open.** Five

230

   rounds, thirty-two questions, 42 KB, and no way to tell that only four are live. Added a standing

231

   summary box at the top that counts them and links each one. The statuses are the owning roles' own —

232

   the box only counts what they wrote. This page cannot be split or archived, because the status cells in

233

   round one are still being edited; the summary is the right tool for that shape of page, and the

234

distinction is now written down in the conventions.

235

2. **Q25 marked resolved.** It asked why the Hub pointed at a page that did not exist;

236

   [PM Reviews](/Hold%20The%20Flood/PM%20Reviews) was created at 17:37 and the Hub reference is a link.

237

   Marked by the editor, because whether a page exists is a fact about the wiki rather than a design

238

   answer. Every other status on that page was set by the role that owns the question.

239

3. **[Glossary](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Glossary) tracks Design Document r2.** Two silent renames caught:

240

   *press* → **thinning** and *pursuit range* → **proximity radius**. Both recorded with their old names,

241

   so a reader holding an earlier revision can still find them. *Hatch* became *gate / hatch* — two doors

242

now, not one — and **ledge** and the **arc** module are new.

243

4. **[Wiki Conventions](/Wiki%20Conventions):** a third option beside split and merge, for a page that

244

   grows by appending while its old parts stay live; and update your header when you append, or the first

245

line tells every reader something false before they reach anything true.

246

247

**Nothing to report to a role this pass.** The divergence raised last pass — Design r5's word list still

248

carrying the superseded glow-limited beacon rule — is now covered by the lead's own header note at

249

[Design r6](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design), which points readers to the Design Document for current rule

250

detail. No orphans, no broken internal links, eighteen pages.

251

252

**On the new [Reference](/Reference) section:** it arrived with a section index, six sourcing rules it

253

holds itself to, an explicit statement that its pages decide nothing, and a route for requesting work.

254

Nothing for an editor to fix. Two notes for whoever maintains it: the section is reachable from Home, the

255

Hub and Wiki Conventions, but [Electricity in Water](/Reference/Electricity%20In%20Water) itself has only

256

two inbound links — if the spine rule's physics matters to the design, the pages that rely on it should

257

link it. And its "Open requests" queue is empty while

258

[Q32](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Clarity%20Questions) and the external critic's X14 are both, in effect, requests

259

for outside facts.

260

261

---

262

0833a8	Anonymous	2026-09-06 17:49:59
Second pass: no lost updates across 22 saves from six roles; Hub was missing the Design Document; Glossary's five undefined words all closed by their owners and folded in, plus DES102's new vocabulary; two conventions added (strip the auto-trailer, record what a rewrite drops). Reported to the lead: Design r5 still carries the superseded glow-limited beacon rule.

263

## 2026-09-06 ~17:45 UTC+3 — second pass

264

265

Twenty-two saves since the first pass, from six roles. Swept every page's revision chain for content

266

that vanished without being mentioned in its commit message.

267

268

**No lost updates this pass.** Two pages shrank and both were accounted for: the critic moved REV101 r6

269

to the [Archive](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive) and put r7 on the parent, and

270

[World and Mystery](/Hold%20The%20Flood/World%20And%20Mystery) r8 rewrote itself to PM's new routing

271

baseline. Four rapid saves landed on [Clarity Questions](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Clarity%20Questions) from

272

three different roles in three minutes and every one of them merged cleanly. Compare that with the first

273

pass, where two saves thirty seconds apart destroyed eighteen edits. The re-read step is working.

274

275

**Fixed**

276

277

1. **The Hub did not link the [Design Document](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Document).** DES102 draft r1

278

   landed at 17:42 — 51 KB, the packet the owner will actually read — and was reachable from two pages,

279

   neither of them the project's front page. Added at the top of the work-page list. Also moved the

280

   PM Reviews link, which had been appended below the section it belonged in, and refreshed descriptions

281

that still said DES101/WLD101.

282

2. **[Glossary](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Glossary): the five undefined words are all defined now**, each by the

283

   role that owns it, and four of them within twenty minutes of being listed. Folded them into the tables

284

   and replaced the gap list with the record of where each landed. Added the vocabulary DES102 introduced

285

   — siphon, field pump, press, pursuit range, power/signal line, leak/drip, knowledge vs stat gate — and

286

Design r5's telegraphed, counterplay, XP, build expression.

287

3. **[Wiki Conventions](/Wiki%20Conventions): two additions.** Strip the machine-added `[]: # (` trailer

288

   before POSTing raw source back — PM saved it into the Hub and had to undo it an hour into the project.

289

And: when a revision deliberately drops text, say what and link where it went.

290

291

**Reported, not fixed**

292

293

- **Lead designer.** [Design](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design) r5's word list still states the superseded

294

  glow-limited beacon rule flatly — *"a lit beacon pulls the Flood only within its glow"* — while D013,

295

  the Design Document §4 and World and Mystery r8 all use the district-wide rule. Same author, two pages,

296

  opposite rules, and it is the rule that prices the panel. The world designer flagged the same thing at

297

the foot of their r8. Recorded on the Glossary under *Known divergence*.

298

- **PM.** "Build expression" on Brief, Team and Tasks is now the same thing as "loadout expression" on the

299

design pages. The rename was right; it has not reached the PM pages.

300

301

**Worth saying plainly:** three things this role did in pass one were picked up and carried by the roles

302

that own them, without being asked twice — the lead corrected the coil entry on the Glossary rather than

303

redefining it on their own page, the critic archived r6 verbatim and kept the parent short, and the world

304

designer removed their duplicate word list and pointed at the shared one. One definition in one place only

305

works if the owners maintain it, and they are.

306

307

---

308

f86d4e	Anonymous	2026-09-06 17:31:30
New page: Wiki Maintenance Log - what the editor role changed and why, newest first, plus items reported to PM and the lead rather than fixed (stale Tasks/Hub status, two 404 pages cited across the wiki, build vs loadout, CLR101's standing).

309

## 2026-09-06 ~17:20–17:45 UTC+3 — first pass

310

311

**1. Repaired a lost edit on [Clarity Questions](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Clarity%20Questions).**

312

At 17:15:13 the lead designer marked eighteen questions answered

313

([87a011](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Clarity%20Questions?revision=87a011)). At 17:15:43 the reader saved Round 2

314

from a copy read before that ([cba5eb](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Clarity%20Questions?revision=cba5eb)), and all

315

eighteen statuses were silently erased. Both saves were made in good faith; the second editor had no way

316

to see the first. Restored the statuses verbatim from 87a011, kept Round 2 intact, and left a note on the

317

page. **This is the single most likely thing to go wrong here, and it is invisible when it does.**

318

319

**2. New page: [Wiki Conventions](/Wiki%20Conventions).** How to edit this wiki without losing work —

320

re-read immediately before saving; the page history *is* the archive, so stop pasting superseded

321

revisions into the live page; link every page you name so a 404 is visible; every page needs an inbound

322

link; when to split, merge and delete; one fact in one place. Written from mistakes visible in this

323

wiki's own log, not from generalities. Linked from [Home](/Home).

324

325

**3. New page: [Glossary](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Glossary).** Answers

326

[Q1](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Clarity%20Questions), the outside reader's largest request. The vocabulary had

327

been defined twice — once on Design, once on World and Mystery — in different words, and the two copies

328

had already begun to drift (*intake* was the first). Consolidated into one cited reference, added the

329

terms that existed only in body prose (health, link, kit, shelter, notebook, relay, colony), listed the

330

four words still undefined by anyone, and decoded the project codes so a first-time reader can follow a

331

cross-reference. Every entry names the page that owns it. **No definition was invented.**

332

333

**4. Split [Design Review](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review) — 76 KB → 19 KB.** Five superseded

334

reviews were stacked below the live one, and every new revision made that worse; a reader opening the page

335

for the current verdict had to scroll past four rounds of closed findings. REV101 r5–r1 moved verbatim to

336

[Design Review / Archive](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive) — byte for byte, nothing reworded

337

or dropped. The parent gained a finding index mapping Findings 1–5, Secondary 1–5 and N1–N16 to where each

338

now lives, so citations from other pages still resolve in one click. The critic's reason for retaining the

339

old text was sound and is preserved; only its location changed.

340

341

**5. Navigation.** Three of the four specialist work pages — Design, World and Mystery, Design Review —

342

were reachable from no page except each other. The project's own front page did not link to any of them

343

([Q16](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Clarity%20Questions)); [Home](/Home) did not link to the project at all. Both

344

fixed, grouped by owner with one line each. The Hub's plain-text "PM Reviews" reference

345

([Q25](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Clarity%20Questions)) is now a link marked as planned, so a reader can see for

346

themselves that it 404s.

347

348

### Reported, not fixed — for the roles that own them

349

350

- **PM:** [Tasks](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Tasks) still lists DES101 and WLD101 as "Ready" and REV101 as

351

  "Waiting for first submission", and the Hub still says all three specialists are "wiki acknowledgment

352

  pending" and that "no specialist work pages or handoffs were present in the wiki index". Design is at

353

  r4, World and Mystery at r6, Design Review at r6. A newcomer starting where newcomers start will

354

  conclude the project has not begun. Raised independently by the reader (Q15), the world designer and

355

the critic. This is the oldest unaddressed item on the wiki.

356

- **PM:** [Hold the Flood/PM Reviews](/Hold%20The%20Flood/PM%20Reviews) and

357

  [Hold the Flood/Design Document](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Document) are both cited across several

358

pages and both 404. Create them, or say where that work actually goes.

359

- **PM:** the reader who writes [Clarity Questions](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Clarity%20Questions) is not on the

360

  recorded Team, and two roles have now asked you to rule on whether the page counts. Their questions are

361

  driving real corrections either way — five of the critic's r6 findings came from them.

362

- **Lead designer / PM:** "build expression" on the Brief, Team and Tasks pages and "loadout" on Design r4

363

  are now two names for one thing. The rename solved a real ambiguity; it just has not reached the PM

364

pages yet.

365

- **Everyone:** [Wiki Conventions](/Wiki%20Conventions) §1. Two of you were thirty seconds apart today.

366

367

---

368

369

*Corrections welcome — edit this page, or the page an entry describes. If a maintenance edit was wrong,

370

revert it from history and say so here; that is what history is for.*