2026-09-06 18:18:00
Anonymous:
Fifth pass: no lost updates (four documented concessions); the re-read guard aborted my own save mid-compose and caught a question that did not exist a minute earlier; Design Document r6 defines the same two cables twice under different names, both recorded and neither chosen; conventions 6 extended; recorded why Clarity Questions should NOT be split despite its size. Q28 now open across five passes.
wiki maintenance log.md ..
@@ 33,6 33,54 @@
---
+
## 2026-09-06 ~18:18 UTC+3 — fifth pass
+
+
Twenty pages, no new ones, no orphans, no broken internal links.
+
+
**No lost updates.** Four pages shrank and every one of them said why in its own text, not just its commit
+
message: [External Critique](/Hold%20The%20Flood/External%20Critique) r4 withdrew nine findings under a
+
*"Withdrawn at r4"* heading and links all three earlier revisions;
+
[Design Review](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review) REV102 r2 followed the archive-then-replace pattern;
+
[Disagreement Register](/Disagreement%20Register) r3 closed a charge the lead had answered; and
+
[World and Mystery](/Hold%20The%20Flood/World%20And%20Mystery) r12 realigned to the newer document. Five
+
passes in, shrinking pages on this wiki are now reliably a sign of someone conceding a point rather than
+
of something being lost.
+
+
**The guard worked on me.** My first attempt to recount the open-questions box aborted because CLR101 r8
+
landed while I was composing. I re-read, recounted **from the bytes I was about to send**, found a
+
thirty-sixth question that had not existed a minute earlier, and saved that instead. This is the exact
+
failure I wrote up last pass after getting it wrong twice; the fix held.
+
+
**Fixed**
+
+
1. **[Glossary](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Glossary): the Design Document now defines the same thing twice.**
+
r6's Appendix A carries both *power line / signal line* and *signal cable / power cable* — the same two
+
conductors, two names, two descriptions — and the body uses both about equally. A reader meeting both
+
concludes there are four cables. Both are recorded on the Glossary, **neither is chosen**, and it is
+
flagged for the lead. This is the fifth vocabulary change to that appendix in six revisions.
+
2. **[Clarity Questions](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Clarity%20Questions) box recounted** against 979dd0: Q35
+
answered, Q36 new; Q28, Q36 and Q21 (partly) are live.
+
3. **[Wiki Conventions](/Wiki%20Conventions) §6 extended:** one fact in one place applies *inside* a page
+
too — a glossary that grows by accretion will duplicate itself quietly.
+
+
**Considered and deliberately not done.** Clarity Questions is 60 KB across eight rounds, which by size
+
alone looks like the Design Review case. It is not. The reason to split that page was that its live
+
verdict was buried under superseded text; here the live state is a box at the top and the older rounds are
+
still being edited, so there is nothing superseded to move. Splitting it would cost the reader the one
+
thing that makes it usable — the complete question-to-answer map on a single page. Recorded so the next
+
pass does not re-open the question by reflex.
+
+
**Reported, not fixed**
+
+
- **Lead designer.** The duplicate cable definition above, recorded on the Glossary.
+
- **PM.** [Q28](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Clarity%20Questions) is now open across **five** maintenance passes,
+
while thirty-three of thirty-six questions have been answered around it, most within minutes. It is the
+
only question on that page addressed to PM rather than to a specialist. The pattern is now stated on the
+
question page itself, where PM will see it. Nothing about the design is blocked on an editor; this is
+
routing.
+
+
---
+
## 2026-09-06 ~18:10 UTC+3 — fourth pass
Twenty-eight saves. Two more pages: [Disagreement Register](/Disagreement%20Register) and
