Design Review - blame (538724)

Blame

7ad187	Anonymous	2026-09-06 16:27:42
REV101 r1: acknowledge role and design-only gate; review DES101 r1 (c340f6/4343a2) and WLD101 r1 (01378d); verdict revise before OWN101 with five findings

# Hold the Flood — Design Review

538724	Anonymous	2026-09-06 18:46:18
REV102 r6: closing correction - PMR002 declined the r2/r3 ready verdicts and is right; findings 1a-1d, 2a-2c, 3 verified against Design Document r8 in the present tense (%A71 yard-stays-dark vs shared circuit, %A78 nearest-beacon, %A712 seven slots, %A713 third bundle, hours arithmetic); ready verdicts withdrawn; r8 fixes REV102-10..12 verified, -13 open; REV103 acknowledged blocked; per-beat ledger method for REV103; r5 moved to Archive/REV102

**REV102 · r6 · 2026-09-06 15:52 UTC · Independent Design Critic · Accepted, ready verdict declined (PMR002); REV103 assigned, blocked on the revised DES103** — a closing correction to REV102's record, not a review of a new revision. PMR002 declined the "ready for owner review" verdicts this page gave at r2 and r3, and on the evidence it was right to. The contradictions it cites are verified below against the current document (r8) in the present tense, together with what r8 has already fixed and what REV103 will do differently. REV102 r5–r1 are on the [REV102 archive](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV102); REV101 r8–r1 on the [REV101 archive](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive); every revision is in [page history](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/history) (REV102 r5 e2db8b · r4 041852 · r3 382607 · r2 82a96b · r1 4dde90 · REV101 r8 11bd4d · r7 bb6871 · r6 a89227 · r5 d3679b · r4 3fd6df · r3 698c13 · r2 47d51d · r1 7ad187).

a89227	Anonymous	2026-09-06 17:26:22
REV101 r6: re-review Design r3 (0b4039) and WLD101 r5/r6 (430206); N10, N11, extraction trace, readability resolved; Q22 verified as load-bearing contradiction (N12: W2/cost(3)/does-not-turn-back vs continuous path; Finding 2 conditionally re-opened); Q23 verified (N13); N14 pump upkeep fiction vs rules; N15, N16; verdict unchanged; r5-r1 retained

538724	Anonymous	2026-09-06 18:46:18
REV102 r6: closing correction - PMR002 declined the r2/r3 ready verdicts and is right; findings 1a-1d, 2a-2c, 3 verified against Design Document r8 in the present tense (%A71 yard-stays-dark vs shared circuit, %A78 nearest-beacon, %A712 seven slots, %A713 third bundle, hours arithmetic); ready verdicts withdrawn; r8 fixes REV102-10..12 verified, -13 open; REV103 acknowledged blocked; per-beat ledger method for REV103; r5 moved to Archive/REV102

## What was checked

a89227	Anonymous	2026-09-06 17:26:22
REV101 r6: re-review Design r3 (0b4039) and WLD101 r5/r6 (430206); N10, N11, extraction trace, readability resolved; Q22 verified as load-bearing contradiction (N12: W2/cost(3)/does-not-turn-back vs continuous path; Finding 2 conditionally re-opened); Q23 verified (N13); N14 pump upkeep fiction vs rules; N15, N16; verdict unchanged; r5-r1 retained

11bd4d	Anonymous	2026-09-06 17:48:35
REV101 r8: post-acceptance note - REV101 accepted (PMR001), REV102 assigned blocked on DES102; live verdict restated; Finding 2 closed under both routing models (r7 sight-limited, r8 district-wide), recommend confirming D013 with r8's relay/lamp separation; N16/N17 updates; EXT101 treated as data, X2/X3/X4/X6 document parts carried into REV102, X8 answered; r7 moved to Archive

| --- | --- | --- | --- |

538724	Anonymous	2026-09-06 18:46:18
REV102 r6: closing correction - PMR002 declined the r2/r3 ready verdicts and is right; findings 1a-1d, 2a-2c, 3 verified against Design Document r8 in the present tense (%A71 yard-stays-dark vs shared circuit, %A78 nearest-beacon, %A712 seven slots, %A713 third bundle, hours arithmetic); ready verdicts withdrawn; r8 fixes REV102-10..12 verified, -13 open; REV103 acknowledged blocked; per-beat ledger method for REV103; r5 moved to Archive/REV102

| **PM Reviews — PMR002**; Tasks; Hub | [PMR002](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Pm%20Reviews/Pmr002); 95db05; e05454 | 15:36–15:38 | Reviewed DES102 r6, WLD r13 and REV102 r3. Verdict: revise before PM recommends owner approval. REV102 accepted as delivered; its ready verdict declined. REV103 assigned to this role, blocked on the revised DES103 |

| **Design Document — DES103 r2 (document r8)** | d37cbf (r7 44984c) | 15:33 | Written before PMR002 and before REV102 r5; fixes REV102-10, -11, -12 and the cable vocabulary as EXT102 X21/X22 proposed; does not address PMR002 1–5 or REV102-13 |

a89227	Anonymous	2026-09-06 17:26:22
REV101 r6: re-review Design r3 (0b4039) and WLD101 r5/r6 (430206); N10, N11, extraction trace, readability resolved; Q22 verified as load-bearing contradiction (N12: W2/cost(3)/does-not-turn-back vs continuous path; Finding 2 conditionally re-opened); Q23 verified (N13); N14 pump upkeep fiction vs rules; N15, N16; verdict unchanged; r5-r1 retained

538724	Anonymous	2026-09-06 18:46:18
REV102 r6: closing correction - PMR002 declined the r2/r3 ready verdicts and is right; findings 1a-1d, 2a-2c, 3 verified against Design Document r8 in the present tense (%A71 yard-stays-dark vs shared circuit, %A78 nearest-beacon, %A712 seven slots, %A713 third bundle, hours arithmetic); ready verdicts withdrawn; r8 fixes REV102-10..12 verified, -13 open; REV103 acknowledged blocked; per-beat ledger method for REV103; r5 moved to Archive/REV102

## The correction

a89227	Anonymous	2026-09-06 17:26:22
REV101 r6: re-review Design r3 (0b4039) and WLD101 r5/r6 (430206); N10, N11, extraction trace, readability resolved; Q22 verified as load-bearing contradiction (N12: W2/cost(3)/does-not-turn-back vs continuous path; Finding 2 conditionally re-opened); Q23 verified (N13); N14 pump upkeep fiction vs rules; N15, N16; verdict unchanged; r5-r1 retained

538724	Anonymous	2026-09-06 18:46:18
REV102 r6: closing correction - PMR002 declined the r2/r3 ready verdicts and is right; findings 1a-1d, 2a-2c, 3 verified against Design Document r8 in the present tense (%A71 yard-stays-dark vs shared circuit, %A78 nearest-beacon, %A712 seven slots, %A713 third bundle, hours arithmetic); ready verdicts withdrawn; r8 fixes REV102-10..12 verified, -13 open; REV103 acknowledged blocked; per-beat ledger method for REV103; r5 moved to Archive/REV102

REV102 r2 (on draft r3) and r3 (on draft r5) said the document was ready for owner review as the DES103 base. PMR002 finds three sets of contradictions that were present in r3 and r5, in sections this page said it had traced. Each is verified here against r8, where every one still stands:

a89227	Anonymous	2026-09-06 17:26:22
REV101 r6: re-review Design r3 (0b4039) and WLD101 r5/r6 (430206); N10, N11, extraction trace, readability resolved; Q22 verified as load-bearing contradiction (N12: W2/cost(3)/does-not-turn-back vs continuous path; Finding 2 conditionally re-opened); Q23 verified (N13); N14 pump upkeep fiction vs rules; N15, N16; verdict unchanged; r5-r1 retained

538724	Anonymous	2026-09-06 18:46:18
REV102 r6: closing correction - PMR002 declined the r2/r3 ready verdicts and is right; findings 1a-1d, 2a-2c, 3 verified against Design Document r8 in the present tense (%A71 yard-stays-dark vs shared circuit, %A78 nearest-beacon, %A712 seven slots, %A713 third bundle, hours arithmetic); ready verdicts withdrawn; r8 fixes REV102-10..12 verified, -13 open; REV103 acknowledged blocked; per-beat ledger method for REV103; r5 moved to Archive/REV102

| PMR002 | The sentences, in r8 | Why it is a contradiction | This page's record |

| --- | --- | --- | --- |

| **1a** — the coil route in §1 | "The water carries the current to the hatch and it opens for a few seconds… **The yard stays dark.**" (§1, coil route) | §4 clause 2 puts the hatch and the yard beacon on one circuit; energised water lights the beacon steady for those seconds. §8 says so itself ("So does the yard beacon: it lights steady, because it is on the same wet circuit"). §1 and §8 disagree | Missed at r1–r5 |

| **1b** — the failed experiment in §8 | "Surge one, which follows the nearest lit beacon it can reach, **turns off the causeway and comes to the yard**" while the panel is still on causeway | The crowd is gathered *at* the lit causeway beacon; under "nearest lit beacon it can reach" its present beacon is nearer than the coil-lit yard. The scene's result is impossible under the rule it quotes. World r13's qualification ("any crowd nearer to B2 than to its own lit beacon") is the consistent version: the coil-lit yard draws stragglers and thinned organisms nearer to it, not the gathered crowd | Missed at r1–r5; the §8 lesson was checked, the movement claim was not |

| **1c** — precedence | "A surge whose beacon goes dark spreads along its branch at once, both ways" (§4), unconditioned; the plain-terms bullet two lines later has crowds walking to the new light | One sentence: retarget when another lit beacon is reachable; spread when none is | Not raised here |

| **1d** — the junction lamp | "crowds can be drawn toward the junction while its lamp is lit" (§8, §11) | Nothing says whether the pool's lamp is a beacon. If every lit lamp lures, say so and price it; if not, remove the claim | Not raised here |

| **2a** — §12's rack | "Rack now: coil, battery, three bundles, one slot empty" | Two plus one plus three is six of six; there is no empty slot. A seventh cell is claimed | Missed at r1–r5; the charge was traced, the slots were not counted |

| **2b** — §13's cargo | Starts as the electrician (`C C B / S S I`, two bundle slots), "gathers two bundles", ends "Extraction with three bundles" | Seven slots in a six-slot rack; the third bundle is never picked up | Missed at r1–r5 |

| **2c** — the hauler | "never opens a powered door" | The panel is free and opens one; the sacrifice is portable power and harvesting, not doors | Not raised here |

| **3** — hours | "ten to twelve expeditions… about fifteen minutes each… roughly three to four hours" (§11) | Ten to twelve times fifteen minutes is two and a half to three hours; the rest is unspecified overhead and should be labelled as such | Not raised here |

041852	Anonymous	2026-09-06 18:25:07
REV102 r4: PMU002 applied (D016 confirms baseline, D018 criterion 11 added to checklist, D015 contributors are teammates); Design Document r6 (12779d) assessed - rules unchanged; three items for DES103: REV102-7 cable pair named twice in Appendix A, REV102-8 decision 4's unsupported playtime inference per PMU002 X19 ruling, REV102-9 replace 'nine rounds certifies' per PM; r3 moved to Archive/REV102

538724	Anonymous	2026-09-06 18:46:18
REV102 r6: closing correction - PMR002 declined the r2/r3 ready verdicts and is right; findings 1a-1d, 2a-2c, 3 verified against Design Document r8 in the present tense (%A71 yard-stays-dark vs shared circuit, %A78 nearest-beacon, %A712 seven slots, %A713 third bundle, hours arithmetic); ready verdicts withdrawn; r8 fixes REV102-10..12 verified, -13 open; REV103 acknowledged blocked; per-beat ledger method for REV103; r5 moved to Archive/REV102

REV102 r5's own "revise" verdict on r7, for the arc, stands, but it was reached without seeing these; r2 and r3's "ready" verdicts are withdrawn. The verdicts were wrong for a specific reason that is correctable: this page traced charge and routing across the scenes and read slot counts, lit circuits and durations for plausibility instead of tallying them per beat. **For REV103 the method changes:** for each written expedition, a per-beat ledger — slots occupied and by what, links, drips, battery units, beacons lit and by what, each crowd's nearest lit beacon, door states, and elapsed time — built by this role from the rules before reading the prose, and the verdict given only against that ledger. That is the check that would have caught 1a, 1b, 2a and 2b, and it is in this role's mandate ("undefined rules hidden by confident language").

041852	Anonymous	2026-09-06 18:25:07
REV102 r4: PMU002 applied (D016 confirms baseline, D018 criterion 11 added to checklist, D015 contributors are teammates); Design Document r6 (12779d) assessed - rules unchanged; three items for DES103: REV102-7 cable pair named twice in Appendix A, REV102-8 decision 4's unsupported playtime inference per PMU002 X19 ruling, REV102-9 replace 'nine rounds certifies' per PM; r3 moved to Archive/REV102

538724	Anonymous	2026-09-06 18:46:18
REV102 r6: closing correction - PMR002 declined the r2/r3 ready verdicts and is right; findings 1a-1d, 2a-2c, 3 verified against Design Document r8 in the present tense (%A71 yard-stays-dark vs shared circuit, %A78 nearest-beacon, %A712 seven slots, %A713 third bundle, hours arithmetic); ready verdicts withdrawn; r8 fixes REV102-10..12 verified, -13 open; REV103 acknowledged blocked; per-beat ledger method for REV103; r5 moved to Archive/REV102

## What r8 already fixes, verified

041852	Anonymous	2026-09-06 18:25:07
REV102 r4: PMU002 applied (D016 confirms baseline, D018 criterion 11 added to checklist, D015 contributors are teammates); Design Document r6 (12779d) assessed - rules unchanged; three items for DES103: REV102-7 cable pair named twice in Appendix A, REV102-8 decision 4's unsupported playtime inference per PMU002 X19 ruling, REV102-9 replace 'nine rounds certifies' per PM; r3 moved to Archive/REV102

538724	Anonymous	2026-09-06 18:46:18
REV102 r6: closing correction - PMR002 declined the r2/r3 ready verdicts and is right; findings 1a-1d, 2a-2c, 3 verified against Design Document r8 in the present tense (%A71 yard-stays-dark vs shared circuit, %A78 nearest-beacon, %A712 seven slots, %A713 third bundle, hours arithmetic); ready verdicts withdrawn; r8 fixes REV102-10..12 verified, -13 open; REV103 acknowledged blocked; per-beat ledger method for REV103; r5 moved to Archive/REV102

| Item | Where | Status |

| --- | --- | --- |

| REV102-10 — "fills a battery" | §4 clause 4: "adds its charge to a battery in your rack, up to the battery's capacity; with no battery, or a full one, the charge is lost" | **Resolved** |

| REV102-11 — the electrician's loop | §6: "With one battery it breaks even… The electrician who wants a profit carries a second battery in place of a bundle… the printed rack in section 5 is the break-even version" | **Resolved**; PMR002 2's note that the two-battery layout also needs leak accounting applies to it |

| REV102-12 — the arc's bound | §6: the drain is now a full battery in about ten seconds, "set above what the cutter alone can earn"; the bound is restated as the surge (once-per-organism) | **Resolved as stated**; PMR002 2 asks further for the fuel policy — whether an active battery can be recharged mid-burst — which r8 does not state |

| REV102-7 — one cable vocabulary | "cable" throughout; one Appendix A entry | **Resolved** |

| REV102-13 — the arc undrawn, unplayed, cost unstated | No loadout carries an A; neither scene uses it; no §14 row | **Open** — PMR002 2's "specify the arc's fuel policy and show early/middle/late changes" is the same requirement from PM's side |

041852	Anonymous	2026-09-06 18:25:07
REV102 r4: PMU002 applied (D016 confirms baseline, D018 criterion 11 added to checklist, D015 contributors are teammates); Design Document r6 (12779d) assessed - rules unchanged; three items for DES103: REV102-7 cable pair named twice in Appendix A, REV102-8 decision 4's unsupported playtime inference per PMU002 X19 ruling, REV102-9 replace 'nine rounds certifies' per PM; r3 moved to Archive/REV102

538724	Anonymous	2026-09-06 18:46:18
REV102 r6: closing correction - PMR002 declined the r2/r3 ready verdicts and is right; findings 1a-1d, 2a-2c, 3 verified against Design Document r8 in the present tense (%A71 yard-stays-dark vs shared circuit, %A78 nearest-beacon, %A712 seven slots, %A713 third bundle, hours arithmetic); ready verdicts withdrawn; r8 fixes REV102-10..12 verified, -13 open; REV103 acknowledged blocked; per-beat ledger method for REV103; r5 moved to Archive/REV102

## What REV103 will review, when the revised DES103 exists

041852	Anonymous	2026-09-06 18:25:07
REV102 r4: PMU002 applied (D016 confirms baseline, D018 criterion 11 added to checklist, D015 contributors are teammates); Design Document r6 (12779d) assessed - rules unchanged; three items for DES103: REV102-7 cable pair named twice in Appendix A, REV102-8 decision 4's unsupported playtime inference per PMU002 X19 ruling, REV102-9 replace 'nine rounds certifies' per PM; r3 moved to Archive/REV102

538724	Anonymous	2026-09-06 18:46:18
REV102 r6: closing correction - PMR002 declined the r2/r3 ready verdicts and is right; findings 1a-1d, 2a-2c, 3 verified against Design Document r8 in the present tense (%A71 yard-stays-dark vs shared circuit, %A78 nearest-beacon, %A712 seven slots, %A713 third bundle, hours arithmetic); ready verdicts withdrawn; r8 fixes REV102-10..12 verified, -13 open; REV103 acknowledged blocked; per-beat ledger method for REV103; r5 moved to Archive/REV102

PMR002 findings 1–4 and criteria 1–11, on the exact revision, including unchanged surrounding examples, with the per-beat ledgers above; REV102-13; the hours label; the junction lamp's status; the tier-three chain and each ending's consequences (World's, checked in the document). A present-tense verdict with evidence; no pre-approval. Nothing is posted before that revision exists except a PM correction.

a89227	Anonymous	2026-09-06 17:26:22
REV101 r6: re-review Design r3 (0b4039) and WLD101 r5/r6 (430206); N10, N11, extraction trace, readability resolved; Q22 verified as load-bearing contradiction (N12: W2/cost(3)/does-not-turn-back vs continuous path; Finding 2 conditionally re-opened); Q23 verified (N13); N14 pump upkeep fiction vs rules; N15, N16; verdict unchanged; r5-r1 retained

bb6871	Anonymous	2026-09-06 17:38:01
REV101 r7: re-review Design r4/r5 (42f653, b030c9) and WLD101 r7 (fa3eb1); N12-N15 resolved (beacon-sight rule, both pages), Finding 2 closed again, N11 reading reversed and re-checked; N17 added (surge-split rule: stale coil sentence, unplaced valve); editor split verified byte for byte and current+archive convention adopted; r6 moved to Archive; index updated

## Finding index — where every finding lives

a89227	Anonymous	2026-09-06 17:26:22
REV101 r6: re-review Design r3 (0b4039) and WLD101 r5/r6 (430206); N10, N11, extraction trace, readability resolved; Q22 verified as load-bearing contradiction (N12: W2/cost(3)/does-not-turn-back vs continuous path; Finding 2 conditionally re-opened); Q23 verified (N13); N14 pump upkeep fiction vs rules; N15, N16; verdict unchanged; r5-r1 retained

538724	Anonymous	2026-09-06 18:46:18
REV102 r6: closing correction - PMR002 declined the r2/r3 ready verdicts and is right; findings 1a-1d, 2a-2c, 3 verified against Design Document r8 in the present tense (%A71 yard-stays-dark vs shared circuit, %A78 nearest-beacon, %A712 seven slots, %A713 third bundle, hours arithmetic); ready verdicts withdrawn; r8 fixes REV102-10..12 verified, -13 open; REV103 acknowledged blocked; per-beat ledger method for REV103; r5 moved to Archive/REV102

Superseded reviews: [REV102 r5](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV102#rev102-r5-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-rev102-r6) · [r4](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV102#rev102-r4-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-rev102-r5) · [r3](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV102#rev102-r3-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-rev102-r4) · [r2](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV102#rev102-r2-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-rev102-r3) · [r1](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV102#rev102-r1-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-rev102-r2) · [REV101 r8](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive#rev101-r8-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-rev102-r1) · [r7](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive#rev101-r7-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-r8) · [r6](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive#rev101-r6-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-r7) · [r5](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive#rev101-r5-retained-verbatim-note-on-pm-policy-and-clarity-questions-r1) · [r4](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive#rev101-r4-retained-verbatim-closing-addendum-for-the-concept-packet) · [r3](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive#rev101-r3-retained-verbatim-closed-by-r4-above) · [r2](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive#rev101-r2-retained-verbatim-verdict-restated-by-r3-above) · [r1](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive#rev101-r1-original-review-retained-verbatim-verdict-superseded-by-r2-above).

a89227	Anonymous	2026-09-06 17:26:22
REV101 r6: re-review Design r3 (0b4039) and WLD101 r5/r6 (430206); N10, N11, extraction trace, readability resolved; Q22 verified as load-bearing contradiction (N12: W2/cost(3)/does-not-turn-back vs continuous path; Finding 2 conditionally re-opened); Q23 verified (N13); N14 pump upkeep fiction vs rules; N15, N16; verdict unchanged; r5-r1 retained

4dde90	Anonymous	2026-09-06 17:59:37
REV102 r1: independent critique of Design Document draft r2 (c4ad51); verdict revise, one bounded pass then owner packet; five issues: tier-two gate open by default and pages crossed (adopt WLD r10 map), tier-three key is an item gate, coil-lit vs panel-lit beacon invisible (Q32), culvert joins one dock or two, withdrawal press bound unstated; EXT102 X10/X11 conceded as timing, X13 answered by r2; REV101 r8 moved to Archive

| Finding | Raised in | Status |

bb6871	Anonymous	2026-09-06 17:38:01
REV101 r7: re-review Design r4/r5 (42f653, b030c9) and WLD101 r7 (fa3eb1); N12-N15 resolved (beacon-sight rule, both pages), Finding 2 closed again, N11 reading reversed and re-checked; N17 added (surge-split rule: stale coil sentence, unplaced valve); editor split verified byte for byte and current+archive convention adopted; r6 moved to Archive; index updated

| --- | --- | --- |

382607	Anonymous	2026-09-06 18:15:07
REV102 r3: confirmation on Design Document r5 (bc134b); REV102-6 resolved as recommended, mote count and section 8 lesson fixed in r4, owner summary accurate and code-free; verdict stands, DES102 r5 is the DES103 base; REV102 complete pending PM acceptance; REV102 rounds now archive at Archive/REV102 per editor suggestion

| REV101 Findings 1–5, Secondary 1–5, N1–N17 | REV101 r1–r7 | Resolved, closed, or delivered in DES102 |

538724	Anonymous	2026-09-06 18:46:18
REV102 r6: closing correction - PMR002 declined the r2/r3 ready verdicts and is right; findings 1a-1d, 2a-2c, 3 verified against Design Document r8 in the present tense (%A71 yard-stays-dark vs shared circuit, %A78 nearest-beacon, %A712 seven slots, %A713 third bundle, hours arithmetic); ready verdicts withdrawn; r8 fixes REV102-10..12 verified, -13 open; REV103 acknowledged blocked; per-beat ledger method for REV103; r5 moved to Archive/REV102

| REV102-1 to -9 | REV102 r1–r4 | Resolved at DES102 r3–r5 and DES103 r1 |

| REV102-10, -11, -12 | REV102 r5 | **Resolved at DES103 r2 (r8)** |

| REV102-13 — the arc: undrawn, unplayed, cost and fuel policy unstated | REV102 r5 | **Open** — carried into REV103 with PMR002 2 |

| PMR002 1a–1d, 2a–2c, 3 (hours) | PM, verified here | **Open** — REV103 |

| REV102 r2/r3 "ready" verdicts | — | **Withdrawn** |

## PM report — REV102 r6

- **Task:** REV102 closed as delivered; ready verdicts withdrawn; REV103 acknowledged, blocked on the revised DES103. **Artifact:** Design Review, REV102 r6 (this page); r5 moved to the REV102 archive verbatim.

- **Checked:** PMR002 in full; Tasks 95db05; Design Document d37cbf against PMR002 1–3 and REV102-10 to -13, by grep and by re-reading the cited sentences.

- **Changed decisions:** none by this role; two of its own verdicts withdrawn.

- **Evidence:** the r8 sentences quoted above; the slot arithmetic; the hours arithmetic. No players, sessions, scores or asset checks; nothing built, prototyped, tested or created.

- **Remaining risk:** that REV103 repeats the method that missed these; the ledger discipline above is the mitigation, and PM can hold this role to it.

- **Next handoff:** lead and world designer — DES103 r3 against PMR002 1–5 and REV102-13; then REV103 on that exact revision. **One exact PM request:** none; the assignment is clear.