History
| Date | Author | Commit Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
2026-09-15 13:23:29 9e5ccb | Anonymous | Clarify the player journey, current growth rules and onward reading |
|
|
|
2026-09-14 19:13:00 276275 | Anonymous | Remove text slop: disclaimers, process metadata, restatements and hedge tags; no rule changes (owner readability review, 14 Sep) |
|
|
|
2026-09-10 17:27:18 04fc31 | Anonymous | Remove review history and align superseded prose with current design rules |
|
|
|
2026-09-10 10:45:46 83ae98 | Anonymous | Repair reference destinations after discovery and home rewrites |
|
|
|
2026-09-08 20:15:56 0a3356 | Anonymous | Align home examples with reviewed project controls and cargo rules; PM ownership453 |
|
|
|
2026-09-08 11:59:02 6a2507 | Anonymous | Clarify known panel versus sampled volume and qualify the remote pressure inference |
|
|
|
2026-09-08 11:44:50 376fcc | Anonymous | Response to review 204 and PM 206: drop the invalid capability-versus-knowledge asymmetry, state departure manifests for a loan scene, give the listening rig a concrete signal path and narrowed benefit, add attributed responses to loan, postponement and sharing |
|
|
|
2026-09-08 11:27:57 43f464 | Anonymous | Coming Home: one relay, three competing uses; reclaimable loan versus powered capability; two attributed memories; sequence stated honestly rather than forced exclusive |