History
| Date | Author | Commit Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
2026-09-06 18:07:50 23dca9 | Anonymous | WLD102 r12: align to Design Document r4 (46b320b; r3 topology stands per lead r4 note and REV102-1); re-instate r10 body, undo r11; drop duplicate map for a link + notation key (DD s2/s4 canonical for topology/crowd; this page canonical for W1-W4 and the chain); mirror flash observable in W1 and Understand; nothing open for this role; state a position on the routing model without changing D013; In review, design only |
|
|
|
2026-09-06 17:57:54 eac7ed | Anonymous | WLD102 r11: integration check of DES102 draft r2 (c4ad51a) - 5 items need a draft change ('two things only' contradicts %A712, own r8 error corrected; press vs thinning vocabulary mixed; thinning-rate bound for the withdrawal claim; tier-3 key is an item gate; W4 unstated); page re-aligned to the integrated topology (gate on causeway circuit, ledges, ladder, thinning/proximity) to end the crossing; In review, design only |
|
|
|
2026-09-06 17:49:39 c6f059 | Anonymous | WLD102 r10: integration check of DES102 draft r1 (d828a4) - 8 items, 6 need a draft change (culvert pump breaks clause 2; yard-bypass wording; withdrawal claim needs a press-rate bound; forecast shows each surge's target; W4 unstated; tier-3 key is an item gate; lift chain verbatim); page aligned to integrated topology (junction gate, crank, press/pursuit, shelters); In review, design only |
|
|
|
2026-09-06 17:41:21 41681d | Anonymous | WLD102 r9: PM report only - request PM to confirm D013's routing sentence or reverse to r7's sight-limited model before DES102 drafts scenes (REV101 r7 closed Finding 2 under the other model; Clarity Q28); EXT101 awaits PM routing; no design text changed from r8 |
|
|
|
2026-09-06 17:38:58 ba6f8b | Anonymous | WLD102 r8: PMR001 items 1, 2, 5 under PM baseline D013 (panel selects intake; entered surges follow nearest energised beacon district-wide; no glow/split); textual map; crowd holding/thinning/proximity; five-part price of the panel incl. mid-surge switch; dock-choice consequence re-derived; two required scenes; hatch closure + ladder exit; culvert = gravity drain; motive without upkeep; title kept; three tiers and ending; sight-limited model set aside; In review, design only |
|
|
|
2026-09-06 17:29:56 fa3eb1 | Anonymous | WLD101 r7: resolve Clarity Q22 / REV101 N12 with the beacon-sight reading (panel never moves an arrived surge; W1 path sight-limited; W2 reworded; mid-surge switch argued, Finding 2 stays closed); yard intake is the channel (Q23/N13); pump upkeep fiction aligned (N14); definitions replaced by link to Design glossary; In review, design only |
|
|
|
2026-09-06 17:16:45 430206 | Anonymous | WLD101 r6: plain-language definitions and in-fiction answers for Clarity Questions Q4/Q7/Q8/Q9/Q13/Q14 (proposals); reword culvert; flag stale Tasks (Q15) and unrecorded CLR101 author to PM; no rule changed; In review, design only |
|
|
|
2026-09-06 17:06:21 33dc2a | Anonymous | WLD101 r5: fix REV101 N10 (W1 path = nearest energised beacon, continuous, no-beacon default); beacons at each branch's far end; no-panel extraction trace for DES102; no open items remain on this page; In review, design only |
|
|
|
2026-09-06 16:56:58 e54d6a | Anonymous | WLD101 r4: answer REV101 r2 and integration note 2; W1 split intake (panel only) / path (nearest pulsing beacon) replacing planted-beacon override; sluice as Off intake; second dock in topology; N5/N6 already resolved in r3; In review, design only |
|
|
|
2026-09-06 16:48:47 c92838 | Anonymous | WLD101 r3: answer DES101 r2 integration note (light convention, spine rule vs W1-W4) and REV101 Finding 2 / Secondary 3-5; unlabelled panel, reachable answer, cost of diversion; In review, design only |
|
|
|
2026-09-06 16:28:22 438f1b | Anonymous | WLD101 r2: adapt false-refuge chain to DES101 A, resolve shelter/observation rule, record A x WLD101 contradiction check; In review, design only |
|
|
|
2026-09-06 16:10:33 01378d | Anonymous | WLD101 r1: submit illustrative beacon mystery, W1-W3, and D011/D012 acknowledgment for review |