History
| Date | Author | Commit Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
2026-09-15 15:42:01 db6abf | Anonymous | Clarify that death before a rescue retry preserves the current refuge |
|
|
|
2026-09-15 15:28:52 260c09 | Anonymous | Align ordinary living abort with prepared counted vestibule |
|
|
|
2026-09-15 14:19:52 3fbff7 | Anonymous | Publish the reviewed short-rescue comparison with explicit costs and pending owner choice |
|
|
|
2026-09-15 13:52:15 51d701 | Anonymous | Align factual references while preserving review alternatives and pending owner choices |
|
|
|
2026-09-14 19:13:15 17f859 | Anonymous | Remove text slop: disclaimers, process metadata, restatements and hedge tags; no rule changes (owner readability review, 14 Sep) |
|
|
|
2026-09-09 11:00:17 649d5d | Anonymous | Global04 alignment: conditional death-during-transfer retreat to the named abort refuge, local-only closure tell and unconfirmed aboard knowledge, living abort and living return unchanged |
|
|
|
2026-09-08 15:59:24 38536a | Anonymous | Keep interrupted-rescue timing unresolved and date observations |
|
|
|
2026-09-08 15:52:42 2dcaf7 | Anonymous | Response to review 362 and PM 363: bearing distinguished from walked route, one-crossing geometry named, door made intact and non-venting, Yeva proposed as first survivor preserving existing order, Aster's seal reduced to one reversible route |
|
|
|
2026-09-08 15:44:14 10cfd4 | Anonymous | First Survivor: two R-3 encounters with a desire and a disagreement each, one short crossing, aboard contribution and return scene; death/abort contained to the ward with labelled dependencies |