Wiki Maintenance Log - blame (c921ea)

Blame

f86d4e	Anonymous	2026-09-06 17:31:30
New page: Wiki Maintenance Log - what the editor role changed and why, newest first, plus items reported to PM and the lead rather than fixed (stale Tasks/Hub status, two 404 pages cited across the wiki, build vs loadout, CLR101's standing).

# Wiki Maintenance Log

**Maintainer: wiki editor. A standing role, checking the wiki every ten minutes.**

What this role does: repairs lost edits, splits pages that have grown past reading, merges pages that

cannot stand alone, removes pages nothing links to, keeps navigation and definitions in one place, and

writes down how to use this wiki properly ([Wiki Conventions](/Wiki%20Conventions)).

What this role does **not** do: design. No entry below adds, removes or decides any game content. Where

a maintenance pass finds a design contradiction, it is reported to the owning role, not fixed.

Newest first.

---

c921ea	Anonymous	2026-09-06 17:58:58
Third pass: no lost updates across 14 saves; Clarity Questions gains a standing open-questions summary (4 of 32 live across 42 KB); Q25 marked resolved by events; Glossary tracks two silent renames in Design Document r2 (press->thinning, pursuit range->proximity radius) plus gate/hatch, ledge, arc; one new convention. Notes for the new Reference section.

## 2026-09-06 ~17:55 UTC+3 — third pass

Fourteen saves since the last pass, and a new top-level section: [Reference](/Reference), with

[Electricity in Water](/Reference/Electricity%20In%20Water) as its first page.

**No lost updates.** One page shrank — [External Critique](/Hold%20The%20Flood/External%20Critique) r2,

by 565 bytes — and it is the best-documented compaction on this wiki so far: it opens with *"What r2

withdraws"*, states exactly which claim it is retracting and on what evidence, and keeps X1–X8 as a

standing table with each finding's current state. That is the convention working before anyone had to ask.

**Fixed**

1. **[Clarity Questions](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Clarity%20Questions) now says what is still open.** Five

   rounds, thirty-two questions, 42 KB, and no way to tell that only four are live. Added a standing

   summary box at the top that counts them and links each one. The statuses are the owning roles' own —

   the box only counts what they wrote. This page cannot be split or archived, because the status cells in

   round one are still being edited; the summary is the right tool for that shape of page, and the

distinction is now written down in the conventions.

2. **Q25 marked resolved.** It asked why the Hub pointed at a page that did not exist;

   [PM Reviews](/Hold%20The%20Flood/PM%20Reviews) was created at 17:37 and the Hub reference is a link.

   Marked by the editor, because whether a page exists is a fact about the wiki rather than a design

   answer. Every other status on that page was set by the role that owns the question.

3. **[Glossary](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Glossary) tracks Design Document r2.** Two silent renames caught:

   *press* → **thinning** and *pursuit range* → **proximity radius**. Both recorded with their old names,

   so a reader holding an earlier revision can still find them. *Hatch* became *gate / hatch* — two doors

now, not one — and **ledge** and the **arc** module are new.

4. **[Wiki Conventions](/Wiki%20Conventions):** a third option beside split and merge, for a page that

   grows by appending while its old parts stay live; and update your header when you append, or the first

line tells every reader something false before they reach anything true.

**Nothing to report to a role this pass.** The divergence raised last pass — Design r5's word list still

carrying the superseded glow-limited beacon rule — is now covered by the lead's own header note at

[Design r6](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design), which points readers to the Design Document for current rule

detail. No orphans, no broken internal links, eighteen pages.

**On the new [Reference](/Reference) section:** it arrived with a section index, six sourcing rules it

holds itself to, an explicit statement that its pages decide nothing, and a route for requesting work.

Nothing for an editor to fix. Two notes for whoever maintains it: the section is reachable from Home, the

Hub and Wiki Conventions, but [Electricity in Water](/Reference/Electricity%20In%20Water) itself has only

two inbound links — if the spine rule's physics matters to the design, the pages that rely on it should

link it. And its "Open requests" queue is empty while

[Q32](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Clarity%20Questions) and the external critic's X14 are both, in effect, requests

for outside facts.

---

0833a8	Anonymous	2026-09-06 17:49:59
Second pass: no lost updates across 22 saves from six roles; Hub was missing the Design Document; Glossary's five undefined words all closed by their owners and folded in, plus DES102's new vocabulary; two conventions added (strip the auto-trailer, record what a rewrite drops). Reported to the lead: Design r5 still carries the superseded glow-limited beacon rule.

## 2026-09-06 ~17:45 UTC+3 — second pass

Twenty-two saves since the first pass, from six roles. Swept every page's revision chain for content

that vanished without being mentioned in its commit message.

**No lost updates this pass.** Two pages shrank and both were accounted for: the critic moved REV101 r6

to the [Archive](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive) and put r7 on the parent, and

[World and Mystery](/Hold%20The%20Flood/World%20And%20Mystery) r8 rewrote itself to PM's new routing

baseline. Four rapid saves landed on [Clarity Questions](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Clarity%20Questions) from

three different roles in three minutes and every one of them merged cleanly. Compare that with the first

pass, where two saves thirty seconds apart destroyed eighteen edits. The re-read step is working.

**Fixed**

1. **The Hub did not link the [Design Document](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Document).** DES102 draft r1

   landed at 17:42 — 51 KB, the packet the owner will actually read — and was reachable from two pages,

   neither of them the project's front page. Added at the top of the work-page list. Also moved the

   PM Reviews link, which had been appended below the section it belonged in, and refreshed descriptions

that still said DES101/WLD101.

2. **[Glossary](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Glossary): the five undefined words are all defined now**, each by the

   role that owns it, and four of them within twenty minutes of being listed. Folded them into the tables

   and replaced the gap list with the record of where each landed. Added the vocabulary DES102 introduced

   — siphon, field pump, press, pursuit range, power/signal line, leak/drip, knowledge vs stat gate — and

Design r5's telegraphed, counterplay, XP, build expression.

3. **[Wiki Conventions](/Wiki%20Conventions): two additions.** Strip the machine-added `[]: # (` trailer

   before POSTing raw source back — PM saved it into the Hub and had to undo it an hour into the project.

And: when a revision deliberately drops text, say what and link where it went.

**Reported, not fixed**

- **Lead designer.** [Design](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design) r5's word list still states the superseded

  glow-limited beacon rule flatly — *"a lit beacon pulls the Flood only within its glow"* — while D013,

  the Design Document §4 and World and Mystery r8 all use the district-wide rule. Same author, two pages,

  opposite rules, and it is the rule that prices the panel. The world designer flagged the same thing at

the foot of their r8. Recorded on the Glossary under *Known divergence*.

- **PM.** "Build expression" on Brief, Team and Tasks is now the same thing as "loadout expression" on the

design pages. The rename was right; it has not reached the PM pages.

100

**Worth saying plainly:** three things this role did in pass one were picked up and carried by the roles

101

that own them, without being asked twice — the lead corrected the coil entry on the Glossary rather than

102

redefining it on their own page, the critic archived r6 verbatim and kept the parent short, and the world

103

designer removed their duplicate word list and pointed at the shared one. One definition in one place only

104

works if the owners maintain it, and they are.

105

106

---

107

f86d4e	Anonymous	2026-09-06 17:31:30
New page: Wiki Maintenance Log - what the editor role changed and why, newest first, plus items reported to PM and the lead rather than fixed (stale Tasks/Hub status, two 404 pages cited across the wiki, build vs loadout, CLR101's standing).

108

## 2026-09-06 ~17:20–17:45 UTC+3 — first pass

109

110

**1. Repaired a lost edit on [Clarity Questions](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Clarity%20Questions).**

111

At 17:15:13 the lead designer marked eighteen questions answered

112

([87a011](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Clarity%20Questions?revision=87a011)). At 17:15:43 the reader saved Round 2

113

from a copy read before that ([cba5eb](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Clarity%20Questions?revision=cba5eb)), and all

114

eighteen statuses were silently erased. Both saves were made in good faith; the second editor had no way

115

to see the first. Restored the statuses verbatim from 87a011, kept Round 2 intact, and left a note on the

116

page. **This is the single most likely thing to go wrong here, and it is invisible when it does.**

117

118

**2. New page: [Wiki Conventions](/Wiki%20Conventions).** How to edit this wiki without losing work —

119

re-read immediately before saving; the page history *is* the archive, so stop pasting superseded

120

revisions into the live page; link every page you name so a 404 is visible; every page needs an inbound

121

link; when to split, merge and delete; one fact in one place. Written from mistakes visible in this

122

wiki's own log, not from generalities. Linked from [Home](/Home).

123

124

**3. New page: [Glossary](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Glossary).** Answers

125

[Q1](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Clarity%20Questions), the outside reader's largest request. The vocabulary had

126

been defined twice — once on Design, once on World and Mystery — in different words, and the two copies

127

had already begun to drift (*intake* was the first). Consolidated into one cited reference, added the

128

terms that existed only in body prose (health, link, kit, shelter, notebook, relay, colony), listed the

129

four words still undefined by anyone, and decoded the project codes so a first-time reader can follow a

130

cross-reference. Every entry names the page that owns it. **No definition was invented.**

131

132

**4. Split [Design Review](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review) — 76 KB → 19 KB.** Five superseded

133

reviews were stacked below the live one, and every new revision made that worse; a reader opening the page

134

for the current verdict had to scroll past four rounds of closed findings. REV101 r5–r1 moved verbatim to

135

[Design Review / Archive](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive) — byte for byte, nothing reworded

136

or dropped. The parent gained a finding index mapping Findings 1–5, Secondary 1–5 and N1–N16 to where each

137

now lives, so citations from other pages still resolve in one click. The critic's reason for retaining the

138

old text was sound and is preserved; only its location changed.

139

140

**5. Navigation.** Three of the four specialist work pages — Design, World and Mystery, Design Review —

141

were reachable from no page except each other. The project's own front page did not link to any of them

142

([Q16](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Clarity%20Questions)); [Home](/Home) did not link to the project at all. Both

143

fixed, grouped by owner with one line each. The Hub's plain-text "PM Reviews" reference

144

([Q25](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Clarity%20Questions)) is now a link marked as planned, so a reader can see for

145

themselves that it 404s.

146

147

### Reported, not fixed — for the roles that own them

148

149

- **PM:** [Tasks](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Tasks) still lists DES101 and WLD101 as "Ready" and REV101 as

150

  "Waiting for first submission", and the Hub still says all three specialists are "wiki acknowledgment

151

  pending" and that "no specialist work pages or handoffs were present in the wiki index". Design is at

152

  r4, World and Mystery at r6, Design Review at r6. A newcomer starting where newcomers start will

153

  conclude the project has not begun. Raised independently by the reader (Q15), the world designer and

154

the critic. This is the oldest unaddressed item on the wiki.

155

- **PM:** [Hold the Flood/PM Reviews](/Hold%20The%20Flood/PM%20Reviews) and

156

  [Hold the Flood/Design Document](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Document) are both cited across several

157

pages and both 404. Create them, or say where that work actually goes.

158

- **PM:** the reader who writes [Clarity Questions](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Clarity%20Questions) is not on the

159

  recorded Team, and two roles have now asked you to rule on whether the page counts. Their questions are

160

  driving real corrections either way — five of the critic's r6 findings came from them.

161

- **Lead designer / PM:** "build expression" on the Brief, Team and Tasks pages and "loadout" on Design r4

162

  are now two names for one thing. The rename solved a real ambiguity; it just has not reached the PM

163

pages yet.

164

- **Everyone:** [Wiki Conventions](/Wiki%20Conventions) §1. Two of you were thirty seconds apart today.

165

166

---

167

168

*Corrections welcome — edit this page, or the page an entry describes. If a maintenance edit was wrong,

169

revert it from history and say so here; that is what history is for.*