External Critique - blame (1992c0)

Blame

319c97	Anonymous	2026-09-06 17:36:50
EXT101 r1: external critique (originality, market, viability). Eight findings, each with a public source or an arithmetic derivation from existing wiki text. New page; no existing page edited.

# Hold the Flood — External Critique

1992c0	Anonymous	2026-09-07 13:25:56
EXT102 r18: withdraw X37 on changed Tram route; assess coherent vision and refuge payoff; preserve review limits

**EXT102 r18 · 2026-09-07 · External Game Critic.** X37 withdrawn after the expedition changed; no new finding. Supersedes [r17 / 2de127](/Hold%20The%20Flood/External%20Critique?revision=2de127). PM owns acceptance; earlier reasoning remains in immutable history.

319c97	Anonymous	2026-09-06 17:36:50
EXT101 r1: external critique (originality, market, viability). Eight findings, each with a public source or an arithmetic derivation from existing wiki text. New page; no existing page edited.

2de127	Anonymous	2026-09-07 12:03:28
EXT102 r17: review vision and Tram product value; raise X37, withdraw process-only X36

## The strongest fair version

a8883a	Anonymous	2026-09-06 18:06:21
EXT101 r4 vs Design Document r3: withdraws X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, X9, X13, X17 (all answered in the document, most by conceding); reduces X16 to a note. Corrects my own r1 error - REF102's primary data shows Vampire Survivors does not carry the Bullet Heaven tag and the traffic tag is Action Roguelike at 10,946 games, not the 650 I quoted from a curator page. New: X19, REF102's two non-overlapping price bands against a 3-4 hour game whose eleven comparables run 9.3-46.2h; X20, owner decisions 4 and 6 are one decision and both branches land an order of magnitude short of their shelf. X18 stands: the criteria still have no slot for the research. Six of REF102's price rows independently re-queried and matched.

1992c0	Anonymous	2026-09-07 13:25:56
EXT102 r18: withdraw X37 on changed Tram route; assess coherent vision and refuge payoff; preserve review limits

You survive a drowned city's enemy crowds by learning how its machinery moves them. At first, lighting a tram brings danger up the road behind you. Later, understanding the delivery system lets you withhold a crowd, move the tram deliberately and leave a safer road for people at home. You are not merely discovering what happened: you are learning to operate the place, then deciding which consequences to live with.

a8883a	Anonymous	2026-09-06 18:06:21
EXT101 r4 vs Design Document r3: withdraws X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, X9, X13, X17 (all answered in the document, most by conceding); reduces X16 to a note. Corrects my own r1 error - REF102's primary data shows Vampire Survivors does not carry the Bullet Heaven tag and the traffic tag is Action Roguelike at 10,946 games, not the 650 I quoted from a curator page. New: X19, REF102's two non-overlapping price bands against a 3-4 hour game whose eleven comparables run 9.3-46.2h; X20, owner decisions 4 and 6 are one decision and both branches land an order of magnitude short of their shelf. X18 stands: the criteria still have no slot for the research. Six of REF102's price rows independently re-queried and matched.

1992c0	Anonymous	2026-09-07 13:25:56
EXT102 r18: withdraw X37 on changed Tram route; assess coherent vision and refuge payoff; preserve review limits

This now gives a plausible player a concrete reason to choose the game: the pleasure of turning frightening places into understood, alterable ones. That audience is likely to enjoy observation, purposeful combat, preparing an intervention and seeing its consequences persist. Someone primarily seeking uninterrupted fighting and escalating combat power may find quick solved returns and discarded charge less rewarding. These are design judgments, not measured audience demand or market positioning.

211efe	Anonymous	2026-09-07 09:50:00
EXT102 r14 against DES105 r1 (Campaign r6) and Districts r9. X32 narrows to two pages: Equipment answered it with a catalogue verdict citing REF107 and this page by revision, carrying REF107's caveat and turning it on its own submission ('neither are our possible rack combinations evidence of depth'); Enemies answered last pass; Campaign and Mechanics/Combat remain at zero. New X34: Districts r8 added a consolidated length table in response to X33, credited the derivation as fair, said the number quoted should be one the role stands behind, and published 8.4 authored / 10.5-11.3 baseline with overhead / 13.0-14.0 everything designed, with 'the only measured figure in this table is zero of them'. The Campaign's owner page still headlines eight and a half hours and section 8 still sources it to Districts r5 while Districts is at r9; none of the consolidated figures appear anywhere in Campaign r6, checked by fixed-string match. Claims nothing about which row should headline. Also records Districts' ruling that criterion 11's other three parts are the integrated document's, with the External Critic on the evidence, and two regex errors of my own caught before publication.

1992c0	Anonymous	2026-09-07 13:25:56
EXT102 r18: withdraw X37 on changed Tram route; assess coherent vision and refuge payoff; preserve review limits

**Verdict: a coherent, promising direction, ready for the owner's consideration as a game premise—not a finished or validated whole-game proposal.** [Brief 68fff6](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Brief?revision=68fff6) now supplies early danger, a changed return, a practical combat purpose and a consequence for inhabitants. The previous claim that the Visionary's concrete illustration is missing no longer applies.

211efe	Anonymous	2026-09-07 09:50:00
EXT102 r14 against DES105 r1 (Campaign r6) and Districts r9. X32 narrows to two pages: Equipment answered it with a catalogue verdict citing REF107 and this page by revision, carrying REF107's caveat and turning it on its own submission ('neither are our possible rack combinations evidence of depth'); Enemies answered last pass; Campaign and Mechanics/Combat remain at zero. New X34: Districts r8 added a consolidated length table in response to X33, credited the derivation as fair, said the number quoted should be one the role stands behind, and published 8.4 authored / 10.5-11.3 baseline with overhead / 13.0-14.0 everything designed, with 'the only measured figure in this table is zero of them'. The Campaign's owner page still headlines eight and a half hours and section 8 still sources it to Districts r5 while Districts is at r9; none of the consolidated figures appear anywhere in Campaign r6, checked by fixed-string match. Claims nothing about which row should headline. Also records Districts' ruling that criterion 11's other three parts are the integrated document's, with the External Critic on the evidence, and two regex errors of my own caught before publication.

1992c0	Anonymous	2026-09-07 13:25:56
EXT102 r18: withdraw X37 on changed Tram route; assess coherent vision and refuge payoff; preserve review limits

The main remaining uncertainty is campaign breadth: after the network's central explanation is understood, do enough later interventions offer different worthwhile decisions? The retained Tram demonstrates one earned payoff, not sustained value across every district. This is the boundary of this favorable verdict, not a replacement finding or a demand to make every solved trip difficult again. District counts and estimated hours cannot answer it.

211efe	Anonymous	2026-09-07 09:50:00
EXT102 r14 against DES105 r1 (Campaign r6) and Districts r9. X32 narrows to two pages: Equipment answered it with a catalogue verdict citing REF107 and this page by revision, carrying REF107's caveat and turning it on its own submission ('neither are our possible rack combinations evidence of depth'); Enemies answered last pass; Campaign and Mechanics/Combat remain at zero. New X34: Districts r8 added a consolidated length table in response to X33, credited the derivation as fair, said the number quoted should be one the role stands behind, and published 8.4 authored / 10.5-11.3 baseline with overhead / 13.0-14.0 everything designed, with 'the only measured figure in this table is zero of them'. The Campaign's owner page still headlines eight and a half hours and section 8 still sources it to Districts r5 while Districts is at r9; none of the consolidated figures appear anywhere in Campaign r6, checked by fixed-string match. Claims nothing about which row should headline. Also records Districts' ruling that criterion 11's other three parts are the integrated document's, with the External Critic on the evidence, and two regex errors of my own caught before publication.

1992c0	Anonymous	2026-09-07 13:25:56
EXT102 r18: withdraw X37 on changed Tram route; assess coherent vision and refuge payoff; preserve review limits

## X37 — withdrawn: the changed route answers the objection

211efe	Anonymous	2026-09-07 09:50:00
EXT102 r14 against DES105 r1 (Campaign r6) and Districts r9. X32 narrows to two pages: Equipment answered it with a catalogue verdict citing REF107 and this page by revision, carrying REF107's caveat and turning it on its own submission ('neither are our possible rack combinations evidence of depth'); Enemies answered last pass; Campaign and Mechanics/Combat remain at zero. New X34: Districts r8 added a consolidated length table in response to X33, credited the derivation as fair, said the number quoted should be one the role stands behind, and published 8.4 authored / 10.5-11.3 baseline with overhead / 13.0-14.0 everything designed, with 'the only measured figure in this table is zero of them'. The Campaign's owner page still headlines eight and a half hours and section 8 still sources it to Districts r5 while Districts is at r9; none of the consolidated figures appear anywhere in Campaign r6, checked by fixed-string match. Claims nothing about which row should headline. Also records Districts' ruling that criterion 11's other three parts are the integrated document's, with the External Critic on the evidence, and two regex errors of my own caught before publication.

1992c0	Anonymous	2026-09-07 13:25:56
EXT102 r18: withdraw X37 on changed Tram route; assess coherent vision and refuge payoff; preserve review limits

[Campaign 93f482 §3.2](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Campaign?revision=93f482) makes stairs reconnaissance the featured middle return. The player leaves Rail selected, bypasses the rail obstruction, reads the drums, collects the bundle and converter, and uses the panel to move the returning crowd away from the depot gates. No combat fuel is required. The optional wet-yard experiment explicitly admits that its refilled bank has no job on this objective and is lost at extraction.

211efe	Anonymous	2026-09-07 09:50:00
EXT102 r14 against DES105 r1 (Campaign r6) and Districts r9. X32 narrows to two pages: Equipment answered it with a catalogue verdict citing REF107 and this page by revision, carrying REF107's caveat and turning it on its own submission ('neither are our possible rack combinations evidence of depth'); Enemies answered last pass; Campaign and Mechanics/Combat remain at zero. New X34: Districts r8 added a consolidated length table in response to X33, credited the derivation as fair, said the number quoted should be one the role stands behind, and published 8.4 authored / 10.5-11.3 baseline with overhead / 13.0-14.0 everything designed, with 'the only measured figure in this table is zero of them'. The Campaign's owner page still headlines eight and a half hours and section 8 still sources it to Districts r5 while Districts is at r9; none of the consolidated figures appear anywhere in Campaign r6, checked by fixed-string match. Claims nothing about which row should headline. Also records Districts' ruling that criterion 11's other three parts are the integrated document's, with the External Critic on the evidence, and two regex errors of my own caught before publication.

1992c0	Anonymous	2026-09-07 13:25:56
EXT102 r18: withdraw X37 on changed Tram route; assess coherent vision and refuge payoff; preserve review limits

That answers the objection by changing the claimed experience, not by relabelling acceptance. The design sacrifices Tram's claim to demonstrate every worthwhile build strategy while preserving free access and discretionary experimentation. I withdraw X37 on these actual scene changes, independently of PM's disposition. This does not establish the written route as optimally safe or prove the optional fight enjoyable. The full original claim, counterargument and correction test remain in [r17](/Hold%20The%20Flood/External%20Critique?revision=2de127).

211efe	Anonymous	2026-09-07 09:50:00
EXT102 r14 against DES105 r1 (Campaign r6) and Districts r9. X32 narrows to two pages: Equipment answered it with a catalogue verdict citing REF107 and this page by revision, carrying REF107's caveat and turning it on its own submission ('neither are our possible rack combinations evidence of depth'); Enemies answered last pass; Campaign and Mechanics/Combat remain at zero. New X34: Districts r8 added a consolidated length table in response to X33, credited the derivation as fair, said the number quoted should be one the role stands behind, and published 8.4 authored / 10.5-11.3 baseline with overhead / 13.0-14.0 everything designed, with 'the only measured figure in this table is zero of them'. The Campaign's owner page still headlines eight and a half hours and section 8 still sources it to Districts r5 while Districts is at r9; none of the consolidated figures appear anywhere in Campaign r6, checked by fixed-string match. Claims nothing about which row should headline. Also records Districts' ruling that criterion 11's other three parts are the integrated document's, with the External Critic on the evidence, and two regex errors of my own caught before publication.

1992c0	Anonymous	2026-09-07 13:25:56
EXT102 r18: withdraw X37 on changed Tram route; assess coherent vision and refuge payoff; preserve review limits

## Why the combination is more convincing now

211efe	Anonymous	2026-09-07 09:50:00
EXT102 r14 against DES105 r1 (Campaign r6) and Districts r9. X32 narrows to two pages: Equipment answered it with a catalogue verdict citing REF107 and this page by revision, carrying REF107's caveat and turning it on its own submission ('neither are our possible rack combinations evidence of depth'); Enemies answered last pass; Campaign and Mechanics/Combat remain at zero. New X34: Districts r8 added a consolidated length table in response to X33, credited the derivation as fair, said the number quoted should be one the role stands behind, and published 8.4 authored / 10.5-11.3 baseline with overhead / 13.0-14.0 everything designed, with 'the only measured figure in this table is zero of them'. The Campaign's owner page still headlines eight and a half hours and section 8 still sources it to Districts r5 while Districts is at r9; none of the consolidated figures appear anywhere in Campaign r6, checked by fixed-string match. Claims nothing about which row should headline. Also records Districts' ruling that criterion 11's other three parts are the integrated document's, with the External Critic on the evidence, and two regex errors of my own caught before publication.

1992c0	Anonymous	2026-09-07 13:25:56
EXT102 r18: withdraw X37 on changed Tram route; assess coherent vision and refuge payoff; preserve review limits

The new Brief's combat example has a specific purpose in [Campaign 93f482 §3.1](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Campaign?revision=93f482): earn charge at the lower crowd's edge, then use a brief local discharge to open the lock-house door without transferring that crowd onto the upper road. The powered door leads to the log and crane parts. Exposure buys a controlled intervention rather than a bank that has no destination. The discharge also briefly lights the upper beacon; the held crowd stays because its lower light remains nearer. This is a concrete causal link, not proof that the Coil is always the best route or that every catalogue item earns its cost.

211efe	Anonymous	2026-09-07 09:50:00
EXT102 r14 against DES105 r1 (Campaign r6) and Districts r9. X32 narrows to two pages: Equipment answered it with a catalogue verdict citing REF107 and this page by revision, carrying REF107's caveat and turning it on its own submission ('neither are our possible rack combinations evidence of depth'); Enemies answered last pass; Campaign and Mechanics/Combat remain at zero. New X34: Districts r8 added a consolidated length table in response to X33, credited the derivation as fair, said the number quoted should be one the role stands behind, and published 8.4 authored / 10.5-11.3 baseline with overhead / 13.0-14.0 everything designed, with 'the only measured figure in this table is zero of them'. The Campaign's owner page still headlines eight and a half hours and section 8 still sources it to Districts r5 while Districts is at r9; none of the consolidated figures appear anywhere in Campaign r6, checked by fixed-string match. Claims nothing about which row should headline. Also records Districts' ruling that criterion 11's other three parts are the integrated document's, with the External Critic on the evidence, and two regex errors of my own caught before publication.

1992c0	Anonymous	2026-09-07 13:25:56
EXT102 r18: withdraw X37 on changed Tram route; assess coherent vision and refuge payoff; preserve review limits

[Colony bf1d83](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Colony?revision=bf1d83) makes the Tram's persistent road change visible through a recurring runner and handcart, and the eventual Stop consequence through familiar people moving to manual facilities. Keep this inhabited refuge: it gives the existing route and power decisions someone to matter to without adding upkeep. Its credible counterargument is presentation cost and the possibility that a brief reaction feels cosmetic. The decision accepts character-presentation work; it does not establish attachment or authorize assets. Neither an extra management system nor invented hardship is needed to make that question legitimate.

211efe	Anonymous	2026-09-07 09:50:00
EXT102 r14 against DES105 r1 (Campaign r6) and Districts r9. X32 narrows to two pages: Equipment answered it with a catalogue verdict citing REF107 and this page by revision, carrying REF107's caveat and turning it on its own submission ('neither are our possible rack combinations evidence of depth'); Enemies answered last pass; Campaign and Mechanics/Combat remain at zero. New X34: Districts r8 added a consolidated length table in response to X33, credited the derivation as fair, said the number quoted should be one the role stands behind, and published 8.4 authored / 10.5-11.3 baseline with overhead / 13.0-14.0 everything designed, with 'the only measured figure in this table is zero of them'. The Campaign's owner page still headlines eight and a half hours and section 8 still sources it to Districts r5 while Districts is at r9; none of the consolidated figures appear anywhere in Campaign r6, checked by fixed-string match. Claims nothing about which row should headline. Also records Districts' ruling that criterion 11's other three parts are the integrated document's, with the External Critic on the evidence, and two regex errors of my own caught before publication.

1992c0	Anonymous	2026-09-07 13:25:56
EXT102 r18: withdraw X37 on changed Tram route; assess coherent vision and refuge payoff; preserve review limits

Keep the late Tram's earned early return, persistent lamp state, free essential observations, optional Siphon insurance and finite ending. After the surprise is known, applying understood rules and choosing which road or service remains convenient can still be the reward. The distinctive proposition is that connected experience, not unfamiliar mechanics for their own sake or a larger list than another game.

211efe	Anonymous	2026-09-07 09:50:00
EXT102 r14 against DES105 r1 (Campaign r6) and Districts r9. X32 narrows to two pages: Equipment answered it with a catalogue verdict citing REF107 and this page by revision, carrying REF107's caveat and turning it on its own submission ('neither are our possible rack combinations evidence of depth'); Enemies answered last pass; Campaign and Mechanics/Combat remain at zero. New X34: Districts r8 added a consolidated length table in response to X33, credited the derivation as fair, said the number quoted should be one the role stands behind, and published 8.4 authored / 10.5-11.3 baseline with overhead / 13.0-14.0 everything designed, with 'the only measured figure in this table is zero of them'. The Campaign's owner page still headlines eight and a half hours and section 8 still sources it to Districts r5 while Districts is at r9; none of the consolidated figures appear anywhere in Campaign r6, checked by fixed-string match. Claims nothing about which row should headline. Also records Districts' ruling that criterion 11's other three parts are the integrated document's, with the External Critic on the evidence, and two regex errors of my own caught before publication.

1992c0	Anonymous	2026-09-07 13:25:56
EXT102 r18: withdraw X37 on changed Tram route; assess coherent vision and refuge payoff; preserve review limits

The simultaneous-services discussion is a separate design preference, not another objection to close. Colony's same-state comparison and [TRL-AS1 r2 / 701901](/Disagreement%20Register/Support%20Assembly?revision=701901) support only the narrow conclusion that this later Tram objective does not demonstrate a valuable exclusivity dilemma. I favor enabling an earned experiment with an earned fallback, accepting potentially weaker retreat commitment elsewhere. Visionary support is recorded on Colony; shared-rule integration and PM disposition are not assumed complete. No further comparison is requested by this review.

211efe	Anonymous	2026-09-07 09:50:00
EXT102 r14 against DES105 r1 (Campaign r6) and Districts r9. X32 narrows to two pages: Equipment answered it with a catalogue verdict citing REF107 and this page by revision, carrying REF107's caveat and turning it on its own submission ('neither are our possible rack combinations evidence of depth'); Enemies answered last pass; Campaign and Mechanics/Combat remain at zero. New X34: Districts r8 added a consolidated length table in response to X33, credited the derivation as fair, said the number quoted should be one the role stands behind, and published 8.4 authored / 10.5-11.3 baseline with overhead / 13.0-14.0 everything designed, with 'the only measured figure in this table is zero of them'. The Campaign's owner page still headlines eight and a half hours and section 8 still sources it to Districts r5 while Districts is at r9; none of the consolidated figures appear anywhere in Campaign r6, checked by fixed-string match. Claims nothing about which row should headline. Also records Districts' ruling that criterion 11's other three parts are the integrated document's, with the External Critic on the evidence, and two regex errors of my own caught before publication.

1992c0	Anonymous	2026-09-07 13:25:56
EXT102 r18: withdraw X37 on changed Tram route; assess coherent vision and refuge payoff; preserve review limits

## Compact checkpoint

211efe	Anonymous	2026-09-07 09:50:00
EXT102 r14 against DES105 r1 (Campaign r6) and Districts r9. X32 narrows to two pages: Equipment answered it with a catalogue verdict citing REF107 and this page by revision, carrying REF107's caveat and turning it on its own submission ('neither are our possible rack combinations evidence of depth'); Enemies answered last pass; Campaign and Mechanics/Combat remain at zero. New X34: Districts r8 added a consolidated length table in response to X33, credited the derivation as fair, said the number quoted should be one the role stands behind, and published 8.4 authored / 10.5-11.3 baseline with overhead / 13.0-14.0 everything designed, with 'the only measured figure in this table is zero of them'. The Campaign's owner page still headlines eight and a half hours and section 8 still sources it to Districts r5 while Districts is at r9; none of the consolidated figures appear anywhere in Campaign r6, checked by fixed-string match. Claims nothing about which row should headline. Also records Districts' ruling that criterion 11's other three parts are the integrated document's, with the External Critic on the evidence, and two regex errors of my own caught before publication.

1992c0	Anonymous	2026-09-07 13:25:56
EXT102 r18: withdraw X37 on changed Tram route; assess coherent vision and refuge payoff; preserve review limits

X37 is withdrawn; X35 remains closed and X36 remains withdrawn. No new consequential finding. Re-review a substantive response, changed player choice or new relevant evidence; do not create a negative replacement merely because the prior objection was answered.

211efe	Anonymous	2026-09-07 09:50:00
EXT102 r14 against DES105 r1 (Campaign r6) and Districts r9. X32 narrows to two pages: Equipment answered it with a catalogue verdict citing REF107 and this page by revision, carrying REF107's caveat and turning it on its own submission ('neither are our possible rack combinations evidence of depth'); Enemies answered last pass; Campaign and Mechanics/Combat remain at zero. New X34: Districts r8 added a consolidated length table in response to X33, credited the derivation as fair, said the number quoted should be one the role stands behind, and published 8.4 authored / 10.5-11.3 baseline with overhead / 13.0-14.0 everything designed, with 'the only measured figure in this table is zero of them'. The Campaign's owner page still headlines eight and a half hours and section 8 still sources it to Districts r5 while Districts is at r9; none of the consolidated figures appear anywhere in Campaign r6, checked by fixed-string match. Claims nothing about which row should headline. Also records Districts' ruling that criterion 11's other three parts are the integrated document's, with the External Critic on the evidence, and two regex errors of my own caught before publication.

1992c0	Anonymous	2026-09-07 13:25:56
EXT102 r18: withdraw X37 on changed Tram route; assess coherent vision and refuge payoff; preserve review limits

Exact Markdown checked: Brief **68fff6**; Campaign **93f482** (§3.1–3.2 and vision); Colony **bf1d83** (inhabitants and service comparison); Build Paths **f6f8ef**; Design Document **125528** (manual hatch-exit context); World **43bcfe** (linked wording response, not acceptance of its regression); [PM Reviews e86295](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Pm%20Reviews?revision=e86295); [Tasks a6a6d3](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Tasks?revision=a6a6d3); [Team 0bff49](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Team?revision=0bff49); [Wiki Conventions ed65ab](/Wiki%20Conventions?revision=ed65ab). Compared against r17's revision-linked baseline. New reference-page research claims are not used to validate the game.

211efe	Anonymous	2026-09-07 09:50:00
EXT102 r14 against DES105 r1 (Campaign r6) and Districts r9. X32 narrows to two pages: Equipment answered it with a catalogue verdict citing REF107 and this page by revision, carrying REF107's caveat and turning it on its own submission ('neither are our possible rack combinations evidence of depth'); Enemies answered last pass; Campaign and Mechanics/Combat remain at zero. New X34: Districts r8 added a consolidated length table in response to X33, credited the derivation as fair, said the number quoted should be one the role stands behind, and published 8.4 authored / 10.5-11.3 baseline with overhead / 13.0-14.0 everything designed, with 'the only measured figure in this table is zero of them'. The Campaign's owner page still headlines eight and a half hours and section 8 still sources it to Districts r5 while Districts is at r9; none of the consolidated figures appear anywhere in Campaign r6, checked by fixed-string match. Claims nothing about which row should headline. Also records Districts' ruling that criterion 11's other three parts are the integrated document's, with the External Critic on the evidence, and two regex errors of my own caught before publication.

1992c0	Anonymous	2026-09-07 13:25:56
EXT102 r18: withdraw X37 on changed Tram route; assess coherent vision and refuge payoff; preserve review limits

Project-room messages **4, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21 and 22** handled individually; last successfully processed incoming message ID **22**. The next batch after 22 was empty. Relevant conclusions are recorded above; other authors' existing correction work is not duplicated. Discussion and submission notices use the project room. Written review only: no game code, prototype, simulation, playtest, art or purchases.