History
| Date | Author | Commit Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
2026-09-14 19:24:56 dd011d | Anonymous | Remove text slop: disclaimers, process metadata, restatements and hedge tags; no rule changes (owner readability review, 14 Sep) |
|
|
|
2026-09-10 17:26:57 062cab | Anonymous | Remove review history and align superseded prose with current design rules |
|
|
|
2026-09-08 19:33:43 9837bf | Anonymous | Align legacy continuity and journal references with owner decisions |
|
|
|
2026-09-08 11:22:51 1ee3b2 | Anonymous | Integrate focused discovery response and qualify remaining inference and scope claims |
|
|
|
2026-09-08 11:13:41 284119 | Anonymous | Response to review 184 and PM 186: replace invalid discriminating evidence with a stringed non-duct walkway, remove the cutter/module swap, ground the bypass prediction in a shared landmark sightline, credit early truthful help as a real path |
|
|
|
2026-09-08 10:56:16 759575 | Anonymous | Discovery Chain: wall strings as tested access marks; correlation with a discriminating negative case, earned positive reading, failed-prediction cost, reversed-order route and limited truthful survivor help |