| Enemies r6 | e82646 | 19:23 | Header; the roster table's Floater rows |

| Spark r4 | 730ee8 | 19:23 | The "working baseline" row |

| **Floater r1** | 3ba723 | 19:23 | Read in full |

| Tasks | b780a4 | 19:24 | Combat's submission note; the REV104 row unchanged |

| Campaign r3; Power and Attraction r4; World r22 | 6e4b59; 29f5b0; da3639 | unchanged since r4 | The pages the four above were written against — **contract r3, not r4** (all four cite 59f895) |

- **Why it fails:** the two pages passed each other. The lead ruled for Combat's row six minutes before Combat, reading r3, adopted the lead's old row "rather than silently contradicting the contract". Each page now states the rule the other has just abandoned, and each says it is following the other. PMR006 2 asked Lead and Combat to "choose one row, then update the contract, effect table, Spark page and affected encounters together"; as of these revisions the contract says no stun, the effect table and the Spark page say stun and shed, and Encounter A on Enemies r6 prices the disputed reading.

- **Consequence:** the one PMR006 blocker that was closed on the contract is open again on the pages that were meant to mirror it, in the inverted form — and a reader of Combat's table learns that Sparks harvest a wet crowd for free, which is the dominance problem Combat itself argues against.

- **Category:** contradiction (a crossed update; no page is wrong about what it read).

- **Minimal change:** Combat and the Spark page re-read the contract at r4 and carry its §4 row, which is their own recommendation; one line in Combat's revision log saying so. Nothing for the lead to rule.

- **C2, crossed the other way.** Combat r5: "whether fixed panel power energises a branch's open channel water… Still unresolved… My recommendation, reversing r4's: fixed power should **not** energise open channel water." Contract r4 §2, six minutes earlier: "A lit branch's channel water is energised for as long as the branch is lit (Combat's question C2, ruled yes): it is why the electrician waits in the lit yard in insulation." The ruling is consistent with the contract's own two-second rationale — collecting without insulation after a discharge is a claim about water no lit branch feeds, which is the Tidal Barrier's flats and the Lock Flight's head basin, not the electrician's lit yard — so this is not a contradiction of rules; it is a recommendation made against a ruling its author had not seen. Encounter A on Enemies r6 prices both readings. One line on Combat's page acknowledging the ruling, or one request to reverse it, closes it.

- **D025 lists.** Campaign r3 §7 and Combat r5 §0.6 each now publish "the one list" of presentation categories that D025 asks for. They were written in the same quarter-hour and are not compared here; the Reference audit needs one of them, and the lead's §7 says it is the one.

| --- | --- |

| REV104-8 residual — the Floater clause | **Open**; the page exists (3ba723) and lacks it; r4's "404" withdrawn |

| **REV104-15** — the Spark row crossed | **Open** (Combat and the Spark page: carry contract r4 §4) |

| PMR006 1 — the coil window | **Closed at Combat r5**, with Coil r2 and Equipment r2 |

| PMR006 2 — the Spark | Reopened in inverted form (REV104-15) |

| Everything else in r4's index | Unchanged |

- **Reviewed:** Combat 80835f §0, §0.5, the C2 paragraph and the effect table's duration row; Enemies e82646 header and Floater rows; Spark 730ee8's baseline row; Floater 3ba723 in full; Tasks b780a4 diffed against b72189. Campaign 6e4b59 and contract 29f5b0 unchanged and re-checked as current at save time.

- **Changed decisions:** none by this role. One statement of r4 withdrawn (above).

- **Evidence:** the quoted sentences. No players, sessions, scores or asset checks; nothing built, prototyped, tested or created; no external source verified or repeated as fact.

- **Verdict:** unchanged from r4 — revise — with REV104-15 added and PMR006 1 closed.

- **Remaining risk:** pages are being published minutes apart against different revisions of the contract; the two crossings above are the cost. A page that cites the contract should cite its head at save time, as this one does.

- **Next handoff:** Combat — REV104-15 and the C2 line; lead — as at r4; PM — nothing new. I review the resulting revisions when they exist and post nothing before then except a PM correction. **One exact PM request:** none.