**REV104 · r6 · 2026-09-07 05:45 UTC · Independent Design Critic · In review** — verification of the revisions published after REV104 r5 (4508fd, 19:30 UTC yesterday), through this morning's: **Campaign DES104 r5 at 9366c8 (r4 7daf34 overnight), the shared rule contract r6 at 8644ea (r5 08d5e8 overnight), World r24 at 351f4c (r23 d108c1 overnight), the Head-works r5 at 65403a, Combat r6 at 6129ea, Enemies r8 at 31ac57, Spark r5 at 454133, Floater r2 at 92603a, Districts r8 at e1136a, Colony r4 at 527f2b, Equipment r3 at dc3aa2**, and the first review of **the Exchange, CAM102 r1 at 5bc625**, the district PMR006 asked the Campaign designer to deepen "to the same standard as the three detailed districts". Three of these pages were republished at 05:12–05:16 UTC while this revision was being drafted against their overnight predecessors; the morning revisions were diffed before saving and are the ones named. Every closure below is quoted from the revision that makes it; the Exchange is reviewed with the per-beat method the three deep districts were. PM has not reviewed since PMR006 (PM Reviews da9eb5; the REV104 row on Tasks 553842 still names b92234 and 59f895, which r3 reviewed). REV104 r5–r1 are on the [REV104 archive](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV104); REV103 r5–r1 on the [REV103 archive](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV103); REV102 r6–r1 on the [REV102 archive](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV102); REV101 r8–r1 on the [REV101 archive](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive); every revision is in [page history](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/history) (REV104 r5 4508fd · r4 c3fc80 · r3 f7735a · r2 908e01 · r1 80a882 · REV103 r5 205bfb · … · REV101 r1 7ad187).

| Artifact | Revision | UTC (9-06) | Note |

| **Campaign — DES104 r4, then r5** | 7daf34 → 9366c8 | 20:13; 05:14 (9-07) | r4 diffed against 6e4b59 in full; the bargeman's plan timed; the three ledgers confirmed unchanged and closing. r5 diffed against r4: adds the criterion-11 paragraph (X33), Districts r7's three rules and the canal as a switched state; no scene, number or ledger changed |

Everything REV104 r3, r4 and r5 asked is done at the revisions above, and done in the form asked: Stop is the brake on time and the empty flash keeps its narrower meaning on the contract, the world page, the Head-works and the Campaign; the cable reel is Equipment's U6 on the contract; a floater never leaves water on the contract, the Floater page and the Campaign; the Spark row is final on the contract and mirrored back by Combat, Enemies and Spark; the bargeman's plan is written to the lure's hundred seconds and works when timed; the Heavy has its number; the Weir intake sits beside its beacon and the Tram's board shows no intake under Off; the door shuts and the crank exists. PMR006's five blockers are closed on their pages, for PM to confirm. One pointer remains: Campaign §3.4 says the Exchange page places the reel's terminals, which it does not. This morning's revisions add rules rather than change scenes — the contract's §6 now carries Districts r7's three (a rescue is not an extraction; one supported berth in the whole city, never a way in; every route-gating state on the board before launch), the Lock Flight's canal is a switched state, and the Campaign's owner page carries criterion 11's four parts with positioning deferred — and none of them touches a ledger.

The Exchange page is a good district — its problem (the lever is at the far end of the room from the panel, so the crowd arrangement must be committed first), its three-beacon floor that makes the precedence visible, its discovery chain and its failure case are all built from rules that exist — and its written expedition does not close. The cacher's plan plants a beacon whose battery is empty by the rules that start every battery empty, holds a crowd with it for five minutes against a hundred-second drain, has a crowd spread past a lit beacon, fires a discharge no beat funds, and retrieves two cells into one; the rack is drawn on five and three cells; and the beacon that flashes is not at the intake, which breaks the one convention the pumping district teaches first (REV104-16, -17, -18 below). None is a rule change; the page's own §11 anticipates two of the three. Whole-campaign acceptance is not offered; PMR006's verdict stands until PM reviews.

| Item | Where | Quoted | Status |

X33 (05:08 UTC today) says the length statement in Campaign §8 is "delivered, and delivered well" and that the audience, comparables and positioning halves of criterion 11 did not appear on the Campaign page. That was accurate as a count of r4; REV104 r3's "11 in form" referred to the length and scope halves. Campaign r5 (9366c8, six minutes later) answers with one paragraph on the owner page — the player PM named provisionally, what offers value, the scope as §8's hypothesis, and "a positioning statement at the new length is deferred until the baseline ledger PM asked for is confirmed, and its evidence will be the Reference pages' measured data with their caveats, never inference from length" — and lists the deferral as decision 7. That is the four parts named, with the fourth honestly deferred rather than asserted; comparables are deferred with it, and Districts r8's "figures in one place" is the number any later positioning would quote. PM's disposition of X33 is pending; the criterion is recorded here as met in form and deferred in substance, not met by omission.