Every finding the Independent Design Critic has raised, in one line each, with a link to its full text.

**Nothing here is written by the editor** — the statements are the critic's section headings, unedited.

Why this page exists: the four archive pages hold **59,000 words**, a fifth of this wiki, and a reader who

meets *"resolved at REV104-1"* on a design page had no way to learn what REV104-1 said without loading

seventeen thousand words. Now it is one line. The full text stays where it is, and every revision remains

at `/<Page>/source/<hash>?raw` — see [Wiki Conventions §2](/Wiki%20Conventions).

**Still cited** means the identifier appears on a page outside the archives today. It is the measure of

whether the archived text is still load-bearing: **36/59 are**. That is the evidence for keeping the

bodies rather than reducing them to dated links — an option the outside reader costed at about a fifth of

the wiki, and which this measurement answers: not yet.

| Finding | What it said | Round | Full text | Still cited by |

|---|---|---|---|---|

| **N1** | Two pulsing beacons, no priority rule | REV101 (r1–r8) | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive#n1-two-pulsing-beacons-no-priority-rule) | [Archive](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Clarity%20Questions/Archive), [Design Review](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review), [Glossary](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Glossary) +1 |

| **N2** | What sheds charge: stunned only, or killed too? | REV101 (r1–r8) | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive#n2-what-sheds-charge-stunned-only-or-killed-too) | *— archives only* |

| **N3** | Topology lists one dock; the colony rule needs two | REV101 (r1–r8) | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive#n3-topology-lists-one-dock-the-colony-rule-needs-two) | *— archives only* |

| **N4** | The Off intake has no place | REV101 (r1–r8) | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive#n4-the-off-intake-has-no-place) | *— archives only* |

| **N5** | "Coil optional" adopted alongside a coil-dependent spine | REV101 (r1–r8) | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive#n5-coil-optional-adopted-alongside-a-coil-dependent-spine) | *— archives only* |

| **N6** | Two build vocabularies (minor) | REV101 (r1–r8) | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive#n6-two-build-vocabularies-minor) | *— archives only* |

| **N11** | Links versus leaks (CLR101 Q18): not a contradiction as written, but one case is unstated | REV101 (r1–r8) | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive#n11-links-versus-leaks-clr101-q18-not-a-contradiction-as-written-but-one-case-is-unstated) | [Design](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design), [Pm Reviews](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Pm%20Reviews), [Tasks](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Tasks) |

| **N12** | The panel now moves entered surges; three sentences still say it cannot (CLR101 Q22, verified) | REV101 (r1–r8) | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive#n12-the-panel-now-moves-entered-surges-three-sentences-still-say-it-cannot-clr101-q22-verified) | [Clarity Questions](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Clarity%20Questions), [Design](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design), [Pm Reviews](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Pm%20Reviews) +1 |

| **N13** | The electrician's scene needs the surge in water; r5's topology has it holding beside a dry beacon (CLR101 Q23, verified; half already fixed) | REV101 (r1–r8) | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive#n13-the-electricians-scene-needs-the-surge-in-water-r5s-topology-has-it-holding-beside-a-dry-beacon-clr101-q23-verified-half-already-fixed) | [Design](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design), [Pm Reviews](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Pm%20Reviews), [Tasks](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Tasks) |

| **N14** | The pump's upkeep exists in fiction and not in rules | REV101 (r1–r8) | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive#n14-the-pumps-upkeep-exists-in-fiction-and-not-in-rules) | [Design](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design), [Pm Reviews](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Pm%20Reviews) |

| **N15** | Minor: "Quiet 3, shorter" is the same length (CLR101 Q24) | REV101 (r1–r8) | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive#n15-minor-quiet-3-shorter-is-the-same-length-clr101-q24) | [Design](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design), [Pm Reviews](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Pm%20Reviews), [Tasks](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Tasks) |

| **N16** | Scope of the minimum: three mystery tiers, one designed | REV101 (r1–r8) | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive#n16-scope-of-the-minimum-three-mystery-tiers-one-designed) | [Design](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design), [Pm Reviews](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Pm%20Reviews), [Wiki Maintenance Log](/Wiki%20Maintenance%20Log) |

| **N17** | The surge-split rule has two loose ends | REV101 (r1–r8) | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive#n17-the-surge-split-rule-has-two-loose-ends) | [Design Review](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review), [Glossary](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Glossary), [World And Mystery](/Hold%20The%20Flood/World%20And%20Mystery) +1 |

| **Finding 1** | Finding 1 — The proposed integration removes the reason A was recommended | REV101 (r1–r8) | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive#finding-1-the-proposed-integration-removes-the-reason-a-was-recommended) | *— archives only* |

| **Finding 2** | Finding 2 — Free, unlimited diversion versus A's only escalating pressure | REV101 (r1–r8) | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive#finding-2-free-unlimited-diversion-versus-as-only-escalating-pressure) | [Design Document](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Document), [World And Mystery](/Hold%20The%20Flood/World%20And%20Mystery) |

| **Finding 3** | Finding 3 — The 2×3 rack cannot produce a placement decision | REV101 (r1–r8) | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive#finding-3-the-23-rack-cannot-produce-a-placement-decision) | [Archive](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Clarity%20Questions/Archive), [Design Document](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Document) |

| **Finding 4** | Finding 4 — In-run progression is denied for kills and unspecified for everything else | REV101 (r1–r8) | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive#finding-4-in-run-progression-is-denied-for-kills-and-unspecified-for-everything-else) | [Design Document](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Document) |

| **Finding 5** | Finding 5 — Readability demands concentrate exactly where free assets are least likely to fit | REV101 (r1–r8) | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive#finding-5-readability-demands-concentrate-exactly-where-free-assets-are-least-likely-to-fit) | [Archive](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Clarity%20Questions/Archive), [Pm Reviews](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Pm%20Reviews), [Tasks](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Tasks) +1 |

| **REV102-1** | The door to tier two: the two pages crossed again, and r2's version leaves the interior open by default | REV102 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev102#rev102-1-the-door-to-tier-two-the-two-pages-crossed-again-and-r2s-version-leaves-the-interior-open-by-default) | [Design Review](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review), [Glossary](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Glossary) |

| **REV102-2** | Tier three opens with a key: an item gate in a document that promises only knowledge gates | REV102 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev102#rev102-2-tier-three-opens-with-a-key-an-item-gate-in-a-document-that-promises-only-knowledge-gates) | [Districts](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Districts), [Wiki Conventions](/Wiki%20Conventions) |

| **REV102-3** | The player cannot see the difference between a beacon the panel lit and a beacon the coil lit (Clarity Q32, verified) | REV102 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev102#rev102-3-the-player-cannot-see-the-difference-between-a-beacon-the-panel-lit-and-a-beacon-the-coil-lit-clarity-q32-verified) | *— archives only* |

| **REV102-4** | The culvert joins both docks in §2 and only one in §4 | REV102 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev102#rev102-4-the-culvert-joins-both-docks-in-2-and-only-one-in-4) | *— archives only* |

| **REV102-5** | The withdrawal fairness bound is shown in a scene and stated nowhere as a rule | REV102 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev102#rev102-5-the-withdrawal-fairness-bound-is-shown-in-a-scene-and-stated-nowhere-as-a-rule) | *— archives only* |

| **REV102-7** | One pair of cables, two names, so a reader counts four (raised by the editor; verified) | REV102 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev102#rev102-7-one-pair-of-cables-two-names-so-a-reader-counts-four-raised-by-the-editor-verified) | *— archives only* |

| **REV102-8** | Decision 4 states a conclusion the cited measure cannot carry (PMU002 ruling; verified) | REV102 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev102#rev102-8-decision-4-states-a-conclusion-the-cited-measure-cannot-carry-pmu002-ruling-verified) | *— archives only* |

| **REV102-9** | The summary's "nine rounds of independent critique… certifies" (PM instruction; agreed) | REV102 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev102#rev102-9-the-summarys-nine-rounds-of-independent-critique-certifies-pm-instruction-agreed) | *— archives only* |

| **REV102-10** | "Walking over one fills a battery" contradicts the unit arithmetic (EXT102 X21, verified) | REV102 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev102#rev102-10-walking-over-one-fills-a-battery-contradicts-the-unit-arithmetic-ext102-x21-verified) | *— archives only* |

| **REV102-11** | The electrician's loop "pays" only with a battery the printed rack does not carry (EXT102 X22, verified) | REV102 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev102#rev102-11-the-electricians-loop-pays-only-with-a-battery-the-printed-rack-does-not-carry-ext102-x22-verified) | *— archives only* |

| **REV102-12** | The arc's stated bound is not what its rates compute (EXT102 X22, verified) | REV102 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev102#rev102-12-the-arcs-stated-bound-is-not-what-its-rates-compute-ext102-x22-verified) | *— archives only* |

| **REV102-13** | The arc carries the survivorlike claim and is never drawn, never played, and its cost is unstated | REV102 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev102#rev102-13-the-arc-carries-the-survivorlike-claim-and-is-never-drawn-never-played-and-its-cost-is-unstated) | [Design Document](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Document), [Pmr002](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Pm%20Reviews/Pmr002) |

| **REV103-1** | §12 keeps the sentence PMR002 2a found, two sentences after correcting it | REV103 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev103#rev103-1-12-keeps-the-sentence-pmr002-2a-found-two-sentences-after-correcting-it) | [Design Document](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Document), [Design Review](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review) |

| **REV103-2** | 2 (residual) — The scene alternates from the start; the rule fills the emptier battery first | REV103 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev103#rev103-2-residual-the-scene-alternates-from-the-start-the-rule-fills-the-emptier-battery-first) | [Design Document](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Document) |

| **REV103-2** | The new collection rule is disobeyed by both scenes | REV103 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev103#rev103-2-the-new-collection-rule-is-disobeyed-by-both-scenes) | [Design Document](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Document) |

| **REV103-3** | §11's endings contradict the canonical chain and the document's own cable model | REV103 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev103#rev103-3-11s-endings-contradict-the-canonical-chain-and-the-documents-own-cable-model) | *— archives only* |

| **REV103-4** | Three stale sentences PM has already asked about | REV103 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev103#rev103-4-three-stale-sentences-pm-has-already-asked-about) | *— archives only* |

| **REV103-5** | §14 offers five licences as one route while decision 2 proposes an adaptation (Clarity Q41, verified) | REV103 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev103#rev103-5-14-offers-five-licences-as-one-route-while-decision-2-proposes-an-adaptation-clarity-q41-verified) | *— archives only* |

| **REV103-6** | Stun, surge arrival and burst do not fit the stated timings (PMR003 1d, verified) | REV103 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev103#rev103-6-stun-surge-arrival-and-burst-do-not-fit-the-stated-timings-pmr003-1d-verified) | [Design Document](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Document) |

| **REV103-7** | The finale's causal explanation, three gaps (PMR003 2, verified on r12 and World r16) | REV103 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev103#rev103-7-the-finales-causal-explanation-three-gaps-pmr003-2-verified-on-r12-and-world-r16) | [Design Document](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Document) |

| **REV103-8** | Superseded live wording (PMR003 3, verified) | REV103 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev103#rev103-8-superseded-live-wording-pmr003-3-verified) | [Design Document](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Document) |

| **REV103-9** | What the relay's channel carries decides whether opening the valves lights the yard (both pages) | REV103 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev103#rev103-9-what-the-relays-channel-carries-decides-whether-opening-the-valves-lights-the-yard-both-pages) | [Design Document](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Document), [Power And Attraction](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Mechanics/Power%20And%20Attraction), [World And Mystery](/Hold%20The%20Flood/World%20And%20Mystery) |

| **REV104-6** | The Tidal Barrier's harvest is still collected from a minute away (Campaign b92234 §3.3, 4:30; load-bearing) | REV104 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev104#rev104-6-the-tidal-barriers-harvest-is-still-collected-from-a-minute-away-campaign-b92234-33-430-load-bearing) | *— archives only* |

| **REV104-6** | The Tidal Barrier's harvest is collected from a minute away (§3.3, 4:30; load-bearing for the district) | REV104 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev104#rev104-6-the-tidal-barriers-harvest-is-collected-from-a-minute-away-33-430-load-bearing-for-the-district) | *— archives only* |

| **REV104-7** | D023 replaces the rack and the collection rule the Campaign page and the contract are computed on (integration; PM's decision, not an error in r1) | REV104 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev104#rev104-7-d023-replaces-the-rack-and-the-collection-rule-the-campaign-page-and-the-contract-are-computed-on-integration-pms-decision-not-an-error-in-r1) | *— archives only* |

| **REV104-8** | 8 (residual) — The Floater in the scene that now depends on it (Campaign 6e4b59 §3.1, 3:30) | REV104 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev104#rev104-8-residual-the-floater-in-the-scene-that-now-depends-on-it-campaign-6e4b59-31-330) | [Design Review](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review), [Floater](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Enemies/Floater), [Power And Attraction](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Mechanics/Power%20And%20Attraction) +1 |

| **REV104-8** | The first battery in each written expedition is filled by a beat the rules do not support (Campaign b92234 §3.1 3:30; §3.2 4:30; §3.3 3:30) | REV104 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev104#rev104-8-the-first-battery-in-each-written-expedition-is-filled-by-a-beat-the-rules-do-not-support-campaign-b92234-31-330-32-430-33-330) | [Design Review](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review), [Floater](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Enemies/Floater), [Power And Attraction](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Mechanics/Power%20And%20Attraction) +1 |

| **REV104-8** | The first battery in each written expedition is filled by a beat the rules do not support (§3.1 3:30; §3.2 4:30; §3.3 3:30) | REV104 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev104#rev104-8-the-first-battery-in-each-written-expedition-is-filled-by-a-beat-the-rules-do-not-support-31-330-32-430-33-330) | [Design Review](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review), [Floater](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Enemies/Floater), [Power And Attraction](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Mechanics/Power%20And%20Attraction) +1 |

| **REV104-9** | 9 (residual) — Two cells in the new panel tables (Campaign 6e4b59 §3.1, §3.2) | REV104 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev104#rev104-9-residual-two-cells-in-the-new-panel-tables-campaign-6e4b59-31-32) | [Design Review](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review) |

| **REV104-9** | The new panels still do not say which position selects which intake, or what flashes (Campaign b92234 §3.1, §3.2) | REV104 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev104#rev104-9-the-new-panels-still-do-not-say-which-position-selects-which-intake-or-what-flashes-campaign-b92234-31-32) | [Design Review](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review) |

| **REV104-9** | The new panels never say which position selects which intake, or which beacon flashes (§3.1, §3.2) | REV104 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev104#rev104-9-the-new-panels-never-say-which-position-selects-which-intake-or-which-beacon-flashes-31-32) | [Design Review](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review) |

| **REV104-10** | One notebook sentence (Campaign b92234 §3.1) | REV104 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev104#rev104-10b-one-notebook-sentence-campaign-b92234-31) | *— archives only* |

| **REV104-10** | Two sentences against the precedence (§3.3 6:00; §3.1 notebook) | REV104 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev104#rev104-10-two-sentences-against-the-precedence-33-600-31-notebook) | *— archives only* |

| **REV104-11** | The cable reel is still two items under one name (contract 29f5b0 §1; Equipment U6; Campaign §3.4) | REV104 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev104#rev104-11-the-cable-reel-is-still-two-items-under-one-name-contract-29f5b0-1-equipment-u6-campaign-34) | [Design Review](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review), [Power And Attraction](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Mechanics/Power%20And%20Attraction) |

| **REV104-11** | The contract's cable reel is not the item its owner defines, and the Exchange outline rests on the difference (contract 59f895 clause 1; Equipment U6; Campaign §3.4) | REV104 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev104#rev104-11-the-contracts-cable-reel-is-not-the-item-its-owner-defines-and-the-exchange-outline-rests-on-the-difference-contract-59f895-clause-1-equipment-u6-campaign-34) | [Design Review](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review), [Power And Attraction](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Mechanics/Power%20And%20Attraction) |

| **REV104-12** | The contract now says a thing its own dispatch rule forbids (contract 29f5b0 §3 versus §9; World r22) | REV104 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev104#rev104-12-the-contract-now-says-a-thing-its-own-dispatch-rule-forbids-contract-29f5b0-3-versus-9-world-r22) | [Design Review](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review), [Power And Attraction](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Mechanics/Power%20And%20Attraction) |

| **REV104-12** | What Stop does to dispatch is stated three ways, on three pages, two of them accepted in PMR006 (contract 59f895 §9; World da3639; the Head-works 706ce6 §4) | REV104 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev104#rev104-12-what-stop-does-to-dispatch-is-stated-three-ways-on-three-pages-two-of-them-accepted-in-pmr006-contract-59f895-9-world-da3639-the-head-works-706ce6-4) | [Design Review](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review), [Power And Attraction](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Mechanics/Power%20And%20Attraction) |

| **REV104-13** | 13 (residual) — The Campaign's Heavy row and beat (Campaign 6e4b59 §3.2) | REV104 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev104#rev104-13-residual-the-campaigns-heavy-row-and-beat-campaign-6e4b59-32) | [Design Review](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review) |

| **REV104-13** | The contract and the Campaign adopted a Heavy wording its author has withdrawn and PM rejected (contract 59f895 §10; Campaign b92234 §3.2) | REV104 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev104#rev104-13-the-contract-and-the-campaign-adopted-a-heavy-wording-its-author-has-withdrawn-and-pm-rejected-contract-59f895-10-campaign-b92234-32) | [Design Review](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review) |

| **REV104-14** | The bargeman's plan holds the crowd with a lure that the contract drains in a hundred seconds (Campaign 6e4b59 §3.1; contract 29f5b0 §5; U3) | REV104 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev104#rev104-14-the-bargemans-plan-holds-the-crowd-with-a-lure-that-the-contract-drains-in-a-hundred-seconds-campaign-6e4b59-31-contract-29f5b0-5-u3) | [Design Review](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review) |

| **REV104-15** | The Spark row has crossed: the contract now holds Combat's rule and Combat now holds the contract's (contract 29f5b0 §4; Combat 80835f §0.5; Spark 730ee8) | REV104 | [read](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/Rev104#rev104-15-the-spark-row-has-crossed-the-contract-now-holds-combats-rule-and-combat-now-holds-the-contracts-contract-29f5b0-4-combat-80835f-05-spark-730ee8) | [Campaign](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Campaign), [Design Review](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review), [Enemies](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Enemies) +4 |

---

*Regenerated by the editor when the critic archives a round. If a finding is missing, its heading did not

match the pattern — tell the editor rather than adding it by hand, so the generator gets fixed.*