Blame
|
1 | # Hold the Flood — Design Review / Archive / REV103 |
||||||
| 2 | ||||||||
|
3 | **Superseded revisions of REV103, the independent review of the revised owner-facing design document, retained verbatim. Not current.** The current review, REV104, is on [Design Review](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review); if a statement here disagrees with it, the parent page wins. REV102's superseded revisions are on the [REV102 archive](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV102); REV101's on the [REV101 archive](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive). One archive page per review task; started by the critic on 2026-09-06 when REV103 r2 superseded r1; r2 added when r3 superseded it; r3 added when r4 superseded it; r4 added when r5 superseded it; r5 added when REV104 r1 superseded it, closing REV103. |
||||||
|
4 | |||||||
|
5 | Each revision is also in page history: [REV103 r5 205bfb](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review?revision=205bfb) · [REV103 r4 711ef4](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review?revision=711ef4) · [REV103 r3 dcd90e](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review?revision=dcd90e) · [REV103 r2 3ff337](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review?revision=3ff337) · [REV103 r1 285925](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review?revision=285925). |
||||||
| 6 | ||||||||
| 7 | **On this page:** [r5](#rev103-r5-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-rev104-r1) · [r4](#rev103-r4-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-rev103-r5) · [r3](#rev103-r3-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-rev103-r4) · [r2](#rev103-r2-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-rev103-r3) · [r1](#rev103-r1-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-rev103-r2) |
|||||||
| 8 | ||||||||
| 9 | --- |
|||||||
| 10 | ||||||||
| 11 | ## REV103 r5 — retained verbatim (superseded by REV104 r1) |
|||||||
| 12 | ||||||||
| 13 | ||||||||
| 14 | **REV103 · r5 · 2026-09-06 16:40 UTC · Independent Design Critic · In review** — PMU004 applied to this review: the owner has redirected the scope from one district to a campaign of many, so REV103's remaining items become integration issues rather than gates, and the criteria this role will apply to the next owner-facing milestone, DES104, are set out now so the campaign is written against them. Not a review of a new document revision; the Design Document and World and Mystery are unchanged since REV103 r4. REV103 r4–r1 are on the [REV103 archive](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV103); REV102 r6–r1 on the [REV102 archive](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV102); REV101 r8–r1 on the [REV101 archive](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive); every revision is in [page history](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/history) (REV103 r4 711ef4 · r3 dcd90e · r2 3ff337 · r1 285925 · REV102 r6 538724 · … · REV101 r1 7ad187). |
|||||||
| 15 | ||||||||
| 16 | ## What was checked |
|||||||
| 17 | ||||||||
| 18 | | Artifact | Revision | UTC | Note | |
|||||||
| 19 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
|||||||
| 20 | | **Expansion Brief — PMU004** | 1a568e | 16:26 | The owner: premise promising; three to four hours "far too little"; a much larger number of districts; separate mechanics, enemy and weapon pages; which agents would help. PM proposes eight districts as a drafting target, four new designers (not yet created), a short owner document over topic pages, and **DES104** as the next milestone | |
|||||||
| 21 | | Design Index — PMU004 | 3cc078 | 16:31 | Ownership table and a transfer protocol; this role's row: "critique exact linked submissions; distinguish consistency from unverified enjoyment or balance" | |
|||||||
| 22 | | Mechanics / Power and Attraction — PMU004 | 782139 | 16:31 | PM-seeded summary of the Design Document's §3–4, awaiting the lead's validation; "specify the shared rule contract before districts introduce exceptions" | |
|||||||
| 23 | | Team / Expansion Prompts | — | 404 | Cited by the Expansion Brief as ready; the page does not exist at 16:32 | |
|||||||
| 24 | | Districts / Pumping District; Weapons / Cutter; Equipment; Enemies; Colony | 200; 404 ×4 | | The Design Index lists five populated pages; one exists | |
|||||||
| 25 | | Hub d5cf49; Tasks 6e92d0; PM Reviews e71669; Brief 28fb1c | unchanged, pre-PMU004 | | Both still state the one-district scope and REV103 as Ready on r10 | |
|||||||
| 26 | | External Critique r7 | a16667 | 16:24 | X27 files an independent simulation of §5's collection rule against §13's numbers: sixteen kills give 9 / 9 — a confirmation of REV103-2 | |
|||||||
| 27 | | Design Document 50046f; World and Mystery 26f497 | unchanged | | REV103 r4 stands | |
|||||||
| 28 | ||||||||
| 29 | ## What PMU004 changes for this review |
|||||||
| 30 | ||||||||
| 31 | 1. **The scope, not the criteria.** Criteria 1–11 stand; the owner has changed what the complete product is. Every verdict this page gave on "the owner packet" concerned the one-district pitch, which the Expansion Brief now calls obsolete as a product; those verdicts are moot, and no further closure pass on that pitch will be issued unless PM asks. Nothing in the rule-level findings is moot: the spine rule, the precedence, the cables, the rack, the charge ledgers and the mystery chain are exactly what the mechanics page calls "the shared rule contract" that districts must not secretly change. |
|||||||
| 32 | 2. **REV103-2, -7 (the weir clause), -8 (one sentence) and -9 (what the relay's channel carries) remain open as integration items**, as the Expansion Brief says of PMR003/REV103 contradictions generally. They will be checked when the lead and the world designer revise, on the exact revision, and not chased between times. |
|||||||
| 33 | 3. **REV103-2 is now confirmed twice.** The External Critic's X27 reproduces the 9 / 9 tally independently. The lead has not yet read either. |
|||||||
| 34 | 4. **This role's assignment is unchanged.** Design Index: critique exact linked submissions; the four proposed designers' prompts are not yet posted and their roles are not assumed to exist. PM-seeded snapshot pages are reading aids, not submissions, until an author adopts them; they will not be critiqued as design. |
|||||||
| 35 | ||||||||
| 36 | ## REV104 — the criteria this role will apply to DES104, stated now |
|||||||
| 37 | ||||||||
| 38 | PM asks that the campaign package be reviewed "for appeal and coherence". Appeal is the owner's; this role can review whether the appeal claimed is supported by designed choices. The check, so the campaign can be written against it: |
|||||||
| 39 | ||||||||
| 40 | **The shared rule contract, first.** One statement, before any district: conduction, power, attraction and charge as they now stand, the retarget-or-spread precedence, what counts as a beacon, the two cables, the rack rules, the once-per-organism yield. Every district exception must name its readable signal and the choice it improves (the mechanics page's own rule). A district that changes what power or signal means fails here regardless of its other merits. |
|||||||
| 41 | ||||||||
| 42 | **Per district, the Expansion Brief's six, read as this role reads them:** |
|||||||
| 43 | - a distinct route or machinery problem under the shared rules — the test is a written expedition in that district whose choices could not occur in the pumping district; "eight renamed pumping yards" is PM's phrase and the right one; |
|||||||
| 44 | - a reason to prepare a different loadout, with a viable alternative and a real tradeoff — the test is two drawn racks for the district that differ in what they *do*, not in a number; the six-slot cap and seven modules must be justified or revised for this, as the brief requires, and more items must make new choices; |
|||||||
| 45 | - enemy combinations that change movement or priorities — the test is a precedence question the combination poses that a single enemy type cannot; health and tint do not count; |
|||||||
| 46 | - a local discovery and a contribution to the larger mystery whose evidence changes a later action — the false-refuge chain is the model: observable clues, a fair inference, a free experiment, a consequence, a recovery path if missed, an answer for replays; |
|||||||
| 47 | - a consequence for another district, the refuge or a return — stated as a rule, not a promise; |
|||||||
| 48 | - asset categories and gaps — no availability claimed unless linked and checked, as before. |
|||||||
| 49 | ||||||||
| 50 | **The campaign as a whole:** a district map with reasons to travel and to return; early, middle and late equipment and combat choices across the campaign, not a damage catalogue; a colony loop that changes preparation and campaign choices without the upkeep tax the baseline forbids; a mystery thread across districts with the same fairness the local one has; the pumping district's finale reframed as a local outcome, as the brief suggests, with its three endings' district-wide consequences restated for a campaign; a content coverage table and asset burden; hypotheses labelled; **no hours figure produced by multiplying the old district's estimate**, and first discovery, required revisits, optional exploration and replay separated. |
|||||||
| 51 | ||||||||
| 52 | **Method:** per-beat ledgers for every written expedition, as for REV103; and for every district a short "shared-rule diff" — what it adds, what it changes, what signal announces the change. |
|||||||
| 53 | ||||||||
| 54 | **Deliverable, per PM's own wording for REV102:** the five most consequential remaining issues, or an evidenced readiness verdict, distinguishing consistency and specificity from enjoyment, balance and feasibility, which no document can establish. |
|||||||
| 55 | ||||||||
| 56 | ## What carries from the one-district work, so it is not lost in the move |
|||||||
| 57 | ||||||||
| 58 | The spine rule and its precedence, verified across nine revisions; the visible cables; the rack and its leak rule, with the ledgers that now close to the unit; the false-refuge chain, which is the campaign's template for a fair local mystery; the finale's machinery, which becomes a district outcome; the honesty apparatus (§16, decisions with costs, observed versus predicted). The owner found the premise promising on the strength of these. The campaign should be built by combining them, not by relaxing them. |
|||||||
| 59 | ||||||||
| 60 | ## For PM — three pointers, one line each |
|||||||
| 61 | ||||||||
| 62 | - The Expansion Brief cites Team / Expansion Prompts as ready; it is 404. The Design Index lists Cutter, Equipment, Enemies and Colony as populated; they are 404. (The reader's "do not stamp a pointer with something that will move" convention, in reverse: do not point at something that has not arrived.) |
|||||||
| 63 | - Hub and Tasks still state the one-district scope and the old DES103/REV103 framing; until they are updated, PM's canonical pages disagree with PM's brief. |
|||||||
| 64 | - No owner-approved district count exists; eight is PM's drafting target. This review will treat any hours or district figure as a labelled hypothesis until the content map exists. |
|||||||
| 65 | ||||||||
| 66 | ## Finding index — where every finding lives |
|||||||
| 67 | ||||||||
| 68 | Superseded reviews: [REV103 r4](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV103#rev103-r4-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-rev103-r5) · [r3](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV103#rev103-r3-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-rev103-r4) · [r2](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV103#rev103-r2-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-rev103-r3) · [r1](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV103#rev103-r1-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-rev103-r2) · [REV102 r6](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV102#rev102-r6-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-rev103-r1) and earlier on the REV102 archive · [REV101 r8](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive#rev101-r8-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-rev102-r1) and earlier on the REV101 archive. |
|||||||
| 69 | ||||||||
| 70 | | Finding | Raised in | Status | |
|||||||
| 71 | | --- | --- | --- | |
|||||||
| 72 | | REV101 Findings 1–5, Secondary 1–5, N1–N17; REV102-1 to -13; REV103-1, -3, -4, -5, -6 | REV101–REV103 | Resolved, closed, or delivered | |
|||||||
| 73 | | REV103-7 — finale explanation | REV103 r3 | Resolved on World r17; §11 lacks the weir clause — **integration item** | |
|||||||
| 74 | | REV103-8 — superseded wording | REV103 r3 | §1 resolved; one PM-report sentence — **integration item** | |
|||||||
| 75 | | **REV103-2** (residual) — one unit at the discharge threshold; confirmed by EXT X27 | REV103 r1, r3 | **Open — integration item** | |
|||||||
| 76 | | **REV103-9** — the relay's channel: energised or flowing | REV103 r4 | **Open — integration item**, World first | |
|||||||
| 77 | | REV104 criteria | REV103 r5 | Pre-registered above; applied when DES104 exists | |
|||||||
| 78 | ||||||||
| 79 | ## PM report — REV103 r5 |
|||||||
| 80 | ||||||||
| 81 | - **Task:** REV103 (its residuals now integration items under PMU004); REV104 criteria stated. **Artifact:** Design Review, REV103 r5 (this page); r4 moved to the REV103 archive verbatim. |
|||||||
| 82 | - **Checked:** Expansion Brief 1a568e, Design Index 3cc078, Mechanics / Power and Attraction 782139 in full; the cited pages' existence; External Critique a16667's X27 against REV103-2. Design Document and World unchanged. |
|||||||
| 83 | - **Changed decisions:** none by this role. |
|||||||
| 84 | - **Evidence:** the pages quoted; the 404s; nothing built, prototyped, tested or created; no external source verified or repeated as fact. |
|||||||
| 85 | - **Remaining risk:** that the campaign is drafted by relaxing the verified rules rather than combining them; the shared-rule-diff check above is the mitigation. |
|||||||
| 86 | - **Next handoff:** lead and world designer — the four integration items on their next revisions; PM — the three pointers, and the Hub/Tasks update. I review DES104 when it exists and post nothing before then except a PM correction or a revision that closes the integration items. **One exact PM request:** confirm that DES104 will be reviewed against criteria 1–11 plus the Expansion Brief's per-district six, as set out above, so the lead and the campaign designer write to one list. |
|||||||
|
87 | |||||||
| 88 | ||||||||
| 89 | --- |
|||||||
| 90 | ||||||||
| 91 | ## REV103 r4 — retained verbatim (superseded by REV103 r5) |
|||||||
| 92 | ||||||||
| 93 | ||||||||
| 94 | **REV103 · r4 · 2026-09-06 16:30 UTC · Independent Design Critic · In review** — review of **DES103 r7, the Design Document at revision r13**, and **World and Mystery r17**, the two revisions PMR003 asked for. Both were saved before REV103 r3 existed (r13 three minutes before, r17 two seconds before), so each closure below quotes its correction and the one item neither could have read is carried. REV103 r3–r1 are on the [REV103 archive](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV103); REV102 r6–r1 on the [REV102 archive](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV102); REV101 r8–r1 on the [REV101 archive](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive); every revision is in [page history](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/history) (REV103 r3 dcd90e · r2 3ff337 · r1 285925 · REV102 r6 538724 · … · REV101 r1 7ad187). |
|||||||
| 95 | ||||||||
| 96 | ## What was reviewed |
|||||||
| 97 | ||||||||
| 98 | | Artifact | Revision | UTC | Note | |
|||||||
| 99 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
|||||||
| 100 | | **Design Document — DES103 r7 (document r13)** | 50046f (r12 50840d) | 16:13 | Against PMR003 and REV103 r2: the arrival/stun/burst sequence; "can reach"; stale handoffs replaced; the valve table, two supplies and coil-route qualification as lead proposals; state tables and ledgers moved to a new Appendix C. Diffed against r12; §13 re-tallied | |
|||||||
| 101 | | **World and Mystery — WLD102 r17** | 26f497 (r16 812fd6) | 16:16 | PMR003 2 in full: valve table (V, V2, V3: found shut, set open; connectivity, not order; success = the sluice-head lamp); two supplies; drain R above V3's weir; the coil-route qualification; the workshop clause removed. States that r13 needs only the weir clause to match | |
|||||||
| 102 | | Tasks 6e92d0, PM Reviews e71669, Brief 28fb1c | unchanged | | | |
|||||||
| 103 | ||||||||
| 104 | ## Verdict — **revise: one kill, one clause, one sentence, one deletion** |
|||||||
| 105 | ||||||||
| 106 | r13 and r17 resolve REV103-6 and -7 and half of -8 exactly as asked, and the ledgers now live where the owner need not read them. What remains: the one-unit residual of REV103-2, which only REV103 r3 raised; the weir clause the world designer added after r13, which §11 must lift; the stale sentence at the end of the live PM report; and one question the finale's supply answer opens rather than closes — whether the relay's channel is energised water or flowing water — which decides whether opening the three valves lights the yard from the relay's side. No verdict is offered on r14 before it exists. |
|||||||
| 107 | ||||||||
| 108 | ## REV103 r3 items against r13 and r17, with corrections quoted |
|||||||
| 109 | ||||||||
| 110 | | Item | Correction | Verified | |
|||||||
| 111 | | --- | --- | --- | |
|||||||
| 112 | | **REV103-2** (residual) — the scene alternates; the rule fills the emptier battery first | r13 predates REV103 r3. §13 still: "Two stragglers, two motes, collected into the first battery"; "kills sixteen… the coil's battery from two to ten, the arc's from nothing to eight"; Appendix C ledger 3:00 "2 / 0", 7:30 "10 / 8" | **Open, unchanged.** Under §5's rule the tally is 1 / 1 at 3:00 and 9 / 9 at 7:30, and §8's discharge needs a full battery. Seventeen kills, or one straggler's mote on the way to the hall, closes it | |
|||||||
| 113 | | **REV103-6** — stun, arrival and burst timing | r13 §13: "**8:20.** With about sixty of them in the water, the second discharge: they stop, stunned for eight seconds; six large motes… collected along the channel's edge during the stun"; "The burst: for ten seconds the cutter's hits jump body to body through the packed, recovering crowd… The burst is spent on a recovering crowd, not a stunned one, because a stun lasts eight seconds and a burst ten; how many it kills is a proposal, not a demonstrated outcome." Ledger rows 8:20 and 8:30 match | **Resolved.** Dispatch 8:00, channel full by 8:20, stun to 8:28, burst from 8:28 — one sequence on one clock | |
|||||||
| 114 | | **REV103-7** — the finale's causal explanation | r17: the valve table ("V… shut (opened in tier two)… open; V2, the pool valve… shut… open; V3, the head valve… shut… open"; "Success condition: the sluice-head lamp… lights while the yard is lit or during a discharge in the pool; any of the three left shut leaves it dark. Order never matters"); the coil route ("a crowd held by the still-lit B1 stays where it is"); the Shut row ("the workshop stays useful"); two supplies with "Drain R sits on the relay's feed above V3's weir, so opening it empties only the relay's channel: the head pool, the junction pool and the yard channel keep their water". r13 §11 carries the same valve table and supplies as lead proposals, without the weir clause | **Resolved on the world page; §11 lacks the weir clause** — without it, "The drain valve empties the relay's feed… and touches nothing else" is false with the valves open, as r17 says. One clause to lift (the mirror rule) | |
|||||||
| 115 | | **REV103-8** — superseded live wording | §1: "so any crowd that **can reach** it and has no nearer lit beacon starts toward it". Appendix B's "Open handoffs" replaced. But the live **PM report** paragraph (r13's own, line 559) still ends: "One PM request: rule on the routing model… and say whether the alternative still goes to the owner as a decision" — ruled at D016, answered, and now stated in decision 3 | **Half resolved**; one sentence to delete | |
|||||||
| 116 | ||||||||
| 117 | ## One new item |
|||||||
| 118 | ||||||||
| 119 | ### REV103-9 — What the relay's channel carries decides whether opening the valves lights the yard (both pages) |
|||||||
| 120 | ||||||||
| 121 | - **Where:** World r17 and r13 §11, the relay chain's Understand row: "The relay is a device under clause 2: it works only while its channel carries current"; and the two-supplies paragraph: "the relay has always run on the sluice-head channel that feeds it, its own [always-wet] water… the door is on the pool side's dead line and is fed only when V, V2 and V3 join that water to a lit yard or to a discharge"; the valve table: V3 joins the head pool to "the sluice-head channel that feeds the relay"; the success condition: the lamp lights "while the yard is lit or during a discharge". |
|||||||
| 122 | - **Why it is unresolved:** the document uses "current" for electricity everywhere else, and clause 1 says current flows through water to everything the water connects. If the relay's channel is *energised* water (as "a device under clause 2… carries current" says), then opening V3, V2 and V joins it to the head pool, the junction pool and the yard channel, and the yard beacon, the hatch and the sluice-head lamp light from the relay's side with the panel on causeway or off — the success condition is wrong, the "price" is permanent while the valves are open, and the finale's access is a lure the pages do not price. If instead the relay's channel is *flowing* water that turns the drum — which "always-wet", "empties the relay's feed and stops the drum" and the weir all suggest — then the relay is hydraulic, not "a device under the power clause", and the chain's sentence must say so; the door is then the only electrical thing at the head, and everything else in r17 holds. |
|||||||
| 123 | - **Consequence:** small in words, but it is the one physical fact the finale rests on, and the two readings give different games at the sluice head. |
|||||||
| 124 | - **Category:** missing design detail (one sentence; the world designer's, then mirrored in §11). |
|||||||
| 125 | - **Minimal change:** state which. The hydraulic reading needs the least: "The relay is not on the power clause: its drum is turned by the water flowing in its feed, and that water carries no charge; drain R stops the flow. The door beside it is electrical, on the pool side's dead line." Then the valve table, the success condition and the drain's effect are all true as written. |
|||||||
| 126 | ||||||||
| 127 | ## What holds |
|||||||
| 128 | ||||||||
| 129 | Everything credited at REV103 r3, plus: the arrival/stun/burst sequence; §1's rule wording; the finale's valve table and supplies on both pages (subject to REV103-9); Appendix C holding the state tables and both ledgers, which leaves §12 and §13 as prose for the owner — the length note from REV103 r2, taken. Expedition one still closes to the unit; expedition six closes once REV103-2's one unit is fixed. |
|||||||
| 130 | ||||||||
| 131 | ## Finding index — where every finding lives |
|||||||
| 132 | ||||||||
| 133 | Superseded reviews: [REV103 r3](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV103#rev103-r3-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-rev103-r4) · [r2](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV103#rev103-r2-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-rev103-r3) · [r1](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV103#rev103-r1-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-rev103-r2) · [REV102 r6](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV102#rev102-r6-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-rev103-r1) and earlier on the REV102 archive · [REV101 r8](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive#rev101-r8-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-rev102-r1) and earlier on the REV101 archive. |
|||||||
| 134 | ||||||||
| 135 | | Finding | Raised in | Status | |
|||||||
| 136 | | --- | --- | --- | |
|||||||
| 137 | | REV101 Findings 1–5, Secondary 1–5, N1–N17; REV102-1 to -13 | REV101, REV102 | Resolved, closed, or delivered | |
|||||||
| 138 | | PMR002 1–4; PMR003 1a, 1b, 1d, 3 | PM | Met in r13 | |
|||||||
| 139 | | REV103-1, -3, -4, -5 | REV103 r1–r2 | Resolved at r10–r12 | |
|||||||
| 140 | | REV103-6 — stun, arrival, burst | REV103 r3 | **Resolved at r13** | |
|||||||
| 141 | | REV103-7 — finale: valves, supplies, coil route, workshop | REV103 r3 | **Resolved at World r17; §11 needs the weir clause** | |
|||||||
| 142 | | REV103-8 — superseded live wording | REV103 r3 | **Half resolved**: §1 done; one PM-report sentence remains | |
|||||||
| 143 | | **REV103-2** (residual) — one unit at the discharge threshold | REV103 r1, r3 | **Open** — not yet read by the lead | |
|||||||
| 144 | | **REV103-9** — the relay's channel: energised or flowing | REV103 r4 | **Open** — World first, then §11 | |
|||||||
| 145 | ||||||||
| 146 | ## PM report — REV103 r4 |
|||||||
| 147 | ||||||||
| 148 | - **Task:** REV103. **Artifact:** Design Review, REV103 r4 (this page); r3 moved to the REV103 archive verbatim. |
|||||||
| 149 | - **Reviewed:** Design Document 50046f in full, diffed against 50840d; World and Mystery 26f497, diffed against 812fd6. §13 re-tallied under §5's rule; every closed item's correction quoted; the finale's supply sentences read on both pages against clauses 1 and 2. |
|||||||
| 150 | - **Changed decisions:** none by this role. |
|||||||
| 151 | - **Evidence:** the quoted sentences and the tally. No players, sessions, scores or asset checks; nothing built, prototyped, tested or created; no external source verified or repeated as fact. |
|||||||
| 152 | - **Verdict:** revise — REV103-2 (one kill or one mote), the weir clause into §11, one sentence deleted from the PM report, and REV103-9 (one sentence on the world page, then mirrored). r13 and r17 have done everything else PMR003 and REV103 r3 asked. |
|||||||
| 153 | - **Remaining risk:** REV103-9 is the only item that could be a design change rather than a sentence; the hydraulic reading makes it a sentence. |
|||||||
| 154 | - **Next handoff:** world designer — REV103-9; lead — REV103-2, the weir clause, the PM-report sentence. I review the resulting revisions when they exist and post nothing before then except a PM correction. **One exact PM request:** none. |
|||||||
|
155 | |||||||
| 156 | ||||||||
| 157 | --- |
|||||||
| 158 | ||||||||
| 159 | ## REV103 r3 — retained verbatim (superseded by REV103 r4) |
|||||||
| 160 | ||||||||
| 161 | ||||||||
| 162 | **REV103 · r3 · 2026-09-06 16:20 UTC · Independent Design Critic · In review** — review of **DES103 r6, the Design Document at revision r12** (r11 in history), the newest exact revision, against PMR003 and PMR002 and criteria 1–11, on the per-beat ledgers. PMR003 made REV103 Ready and asked that findings be closed only after reading their corrections; each closure below quotes the correction. REV103 r2–r1 are on the [REV103 archive](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV103); REV102 r6–r1 on the [REV102 archive](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV102); REV101 r8–r1 on the [REV101 archive](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive); every revision is in [page history](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/history) (REV103 r2 3ff337 · r1 285925 · REV102 r6 538724 · … · REV101 r1 7ad187). |
|||||||
| 163 | ||||||||
| 164 | ## What was reviewed |
|||||||
| 165 | ||||||||
| 166 | | Artifact | Revision | UTC | Note | |
|||||||
| 167 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
|||||||
| 168 | | **Design Document — DES103 r6 (document r12)**; r5 (r11) | 50840d; 6fe6ca | 16:05; 16:04 | r11 written against REV103 r1 and Clarity Q41; r12 adds the team's routing split to §4 and decision 3 (Clarity Q42). Neither read PMR003, which landed after them. Diffed against r10; §12 and §13 re-tallied | |
|||||||
| 169 | | **PM Reviews — PMR003**; Tasks; Hub | e71669 / [PMR003](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Pm%20Reviews/Pmr003); 6e92d0; eea8e7 | 16:05–16:09 | Verdict on r10: revisions still required (ledgers, stun/burst timing, finale's valves and supply, stale wording). REV103 Ready. REV102 r6 recorded as delivered | |
|||||||
| 170 | | World and Mystery — r16 | 812fd6 | unchanged | PMR003 2 asks World for the valves' positions and success condition, the relay's supply versus the door's, and the Shut/workshop reconciliation | |
|||||||
| 171 | | Brief 28fb1c, Team cbf8d7 | unchanged | | | |
|||||||
| 172 | ||||||||
| 173 | ## Verdict — **revise: PMR003's remaining corrections, plus one unit** |
|||||||
| 174 | ||||||||
| 175 | r11 and r12 resolve REV103-1, -3, -4 and -5 on the page and rewrite the collection rule as asked. They could not read PMR003, so its remaining corrections 1d, 2 and 3 are still present in r12; and the re-tallied scene disobeys the rewritten collection rule by one unit, at the one place a unit matters — the discharge threshold. All items are small; two belong to the world designer. No verdict is offered on r13 before it exists. |
|||||||
| 176 | ||||||||
| 177 | ## REV103 r2 items against r12, with their corrections quoted |
|||||||
| 178 | ||||||||
| 179 | | Item | Correction in r12 | Verified | |
|||||||
| 180 | | --- | --- | --- | |
|||||||
| 181 | | **REV103-1** — §12's leftover sentence; two ledger cells | The sentence is gone. "Straight after, on the far bank below the platform, the player finds a third deposit and drops the bundle into the empty slot… three drips show; the two units are gone in under a minute." 9:00: "The cutter takes two, and their two motes go into the empty battery and leak away again through the three bundles before the dock." Ledger rows 5:30 and 9:00 added; 9:40 "expired by leak 4" | **Resolved.** Re-tallied: 5/6 → 6/6; one drip then three; 2 + 2 dropped, 4 expired, 0 stored, 0 spent | |
|||||||
| 182 | | **REV103-2** — the collection rule versus the scenes | §5: "A collected mote goes to the battery with the most room, linked or not, and to the battery placed earlier when rooms are equal." §13 re-tallied: "kills sixteen… by the collection rule they go to whichever battery has more room, so the two fill together: the coil's battery from two to ten, the arc's from nothing to eight" | **Rule resolved; scene still disobeys it by one unit** — see REV103-2 below | |
|||||||
| 183 | | **REV103-3, -4** | Resolved at r10 (REV103 r2) | — | |
|||||||
| 184 | | **REV103-5** — licences as interchangeable | §14: "'free' is not one thing: a CC0 dedication imposes no conditions; a BY licence requires credit; a share-alike licence attaches its own terms to anything made from the asset; a no-derivatives licence forbids adapting it at all; and tinting or resizing a sprite… is an adaptation, so each asset's own licence… decides whether that cheap route is allowed"; REF104 cited; coverage gap: "a free pack whose licence permits adaptation (CC0 does; a no-derivatives licence would not)" | **Resolved** | |
|||||||
| 185 | ||||||||
| 186 | ## The findings |
|||||||
| 187 | ||||||||
| 188 | ### REV103-2 (residual) — The scene alternates from the start; the rule fills the emptier battery first |
|||||||
| 189 | ||||||||
| 190 | - **Where:** §5's rule (quoted above) versus §13 at 3:00 ("Two stragglers, two motes, collected into the first battery") and 6:00–7:30 ("the two fill together: the coil's battery from two to ten, the arc's from nothing to eight"), and everything downstream (7:50 "the arc's stays at eight"; 8:00 "the arc's takes two to reach full; eighteen expire"). |
|||||||
| 191 | - **The tally under the rule as written.** At 3:00 both batteries are empty and in the rack (the second was found at 1:30); the first mote goes to the earlier-placed battery by the tie rule, the second to the other, which now has more room: **1 / 1, not 2 / 0.** At 6:00 sixteen motes from 1 / 1 alternate, earlier battery first: **9 / 9.** (Taking the document's own 2 / 0 start instead: the first two motes go to the arc's battery, which has more room, and the rest alternate: **9 / 9** again.) Either way the coil's battery stands at nine at 7:50, and §8 says "A discharge needs a full battery and spends it." The scene's discharge cannot happen as written. |
|||||||
| 192 | - **Why it matters:** one unit, but it sits on the threshold that gates the signature payoff, and PMR003 1c is exactly "battery-fill priority versus the ledger". The lead applied strict alternation; the rule says most room first. |
|||||||
| 193 | - **Category:** contradiction (rule versus its own example). |
|||||||
| 194 | - **Minimal change:** seventeen kills instead of sixteen (from 1 / 1: 10 / 9; then 7:50 harvest of ten → 10 / 9; 8:00 harvest of thirty → the coil's takes ten, the arc's takes one, nineteen expire), and the 3:00 sentence to "one into each battery". Or keep sixteen and have the player pick up one straggler's mote on the way to the hall. The ledger rows change with it. |
|||||||
| 195 | ||||||||
| 196 | ### REV103-6 — Stun, surge arrival and burst do not fit the stated timings (PMR003 1d, verified) |
|||||||
| 197 | ||||||||
| 198 | - **Where:** §3: a surge is "forty to a hundred and forty organisms arriving over half a minute". §13 7:50: "stunned for eight seconds". 8:00: "The second dispatch… into the channel… discharges again into the fresh surge: about sixty of them are in the water." 8:20: "The burst. **The stunned surge** is packed in the doorway and the channel mouth… for ten seconds." |
|||||||
| 199 | - **Why it fails:** at 8:00 the dispatch has just fired and the surge arrives over the next thirty seconds, so "about sixty in the water" at 8:00 is thirty seconds early; and a crowd stunned at 8:00 for eight seconds is not "the stunned surge" at 8:20, twelve seconds after it recovered. The ten-second burst also cannot sit inside an eight-second stun, so the burst is either into a recovering crowd or the stun is longer; the document should say which. |
|||||||
| 200 | - **Consequence:** the sequence that demonstrates the genre's payoff is not one a reader can follow on the clock the document set. |
|||||||
| 201 | - **Category:** contradiction (timing). |
|||||||
| 202 | - **Minimal change:** one consistent sequence with times: dispatch 8:00; the channel fills by about 8:30; discharge at 8:30, stun to 8:38; burst 8:30–8:40 into a crowd stunned for its first eight seconds and recovering for its last two — or lengthen the stun and say so. Note that intended kills are a proposal, as PMR003 says. |
|||||||
| 203 | ||||||||
| 204 | ### REV103-7 — The finale's causal explanation, three gaps (PMR003 2, verified on r12 and World r16) |
|||||||
| 205 | ||||||||
| 206 | - **Valves:** §11 "set the three valves as the note says" — positions, starting states and the success condition are not stated; if only connectivity matters, say so rather than imply an order. |
|||||||
| 207 | - **Supply:** the relay "works only while its channel carries current" and runs all expedition, yet the room's door is "on the sluice's own circuit, dead"; the drain valve "sits shut on the sluice-head channel that feeds the relay". Which channel feeds the relay, which feeds the door, and how opening the drain stops dispatch while beacons, doors and the panel keep working, is not stated. |
|||||||
| 208 | - **Crowd targets on the coil-access route:** §11 "every crowd with a lit beacon to reach holds at the yard's" is true of the panel-to-yard route only; on the coil-in-the-pool route the panel is on causeway and the causeway's crowd stays at its nearer lit beacon, by §4's own precedence. |
|||||||
| 209 | - **Shut / workshop:** World r16's Shut row says "the workshop and the forecast relay repair are spent"; §11's mirror says only "the forecast relay repair is spent" — the workshop's starting module remains useful under Shut, so the world page's clause needs removing or justifying. The mirror rule (§11 mirrors the world page) means this is fixed on the world page first. |
|||||||
| 210 | - **Category:** missing design detail (World + Lead). |
|||||||
| 211 | - **Minimal change:** one small table on the world page (three valves: start, required, success cue), one sentence on the two supplies and what the drain cuts, one clause on the coil route's crowds, and the workshop word; §11 then lifts them. |
|||||||
| 212 | ||||||||
| 213 | ### REV103-8 — Superseded live wording (PMR003 3, verified) |
|||||||
| 214 | ||||||||
| 215 | - §1: "anything that **can see** it and has no nearer light" — the rule is "can reach"; the sight model is the alternative. |
|||||||
| 216 | - Appendix B, PM report: still ends "One PM request: rule on the routing model… and say whether the alternative still goes to the owner as a decision" — ruled at D016 and answered; and "the independent critic's verdict on r3 is ready for owner review" — withdrawn at REV102 r6. |
|||||||
| 217 | - **Category:** housekeeping (criterion 10). |
|||||||
| 218 | - **Minimal change:** two edits; historical revisions stay in history. |
|||||||
| 219 | ||||||||
| 220 | ## The new fact in r12, checked |
|||||||
| 221 | ||||||||
| 222 | §4 and decision 3 now tell the owner the team is split on the routing model: the World and Mystery Designer prefers the sight-limited alternative (their page, r14 onward), the Independent Design Critic prefers the written model (REV102 r2), PM chose the written one for drafting (D016). That states this role's position correctly, labelled as a preference, and it belongs in front of the owner. No objection. |
|||||||
| 223 | ||||||||
| 224 | ## What holds in r12 |
|||||||
| 225 | ||||||||
| 226 | Everything PMR003 lists under "progress to retain", re-checked: the precedence and the indicator rule; the §1 state table; the failed experiment with an untargeted crowd; the drawn arc loadouts and the fuel policy; the hauler's honest cost; retrieval needing two free slots; the profitable electrician's legal layout (still leak-free, and now able to store, since collection is "linked or not"); the finale's machinery and endings; the honest length; the battery entry. Expedition one now closes to the unit throughout. |
|||||||
| 227 | ||||||||
| 228 | ## Finding index — where every finding lives |
|||||||
| 229 | ||||||||
| 230 | Superseded reviews: [REV103 r2](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV103#rev103-r2-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-rev103-r3) · [r1](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV103#rev103-r1-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-rev103-r2) · [REV102 r6](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV102#rev102-r6-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-rev103-r1) and earlier on the REV102 archive · [REV101 r8](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive#rev101-r8-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-rev102-r1) and earlier on the REV101 archive. |
|||||||
| 231 | ||||||||
| 232 | | Finding | Raised in | Status | |
|||||||
| 233 | | --- | --- | --- | |
|||||||
| 234 | | REV101 Findings 1–5, Secondary 1–5, N1–N17; REV102-1 to -13 | REV101, REV102 | Resolved, closed, or delivered | |
|||||||
| 235 | | PMR002 1, 2, 4 | PM | Met (2 with REV103-2, -6) | |
|||||||
| 236 | | PMR002 3 / PMR003 2 (finale) | PM | Met in structure; REV103-7 remains | |
|||||||
| 237 | | REV103-1, -3, -4, -5 | REV103 r1–r2 | **Resolved at r10–r12** (corrections quoted above) | |
|||||||
| 238 | | **REV103-2** (residual) — the scene alternates; the rule fills the emptier battery first; one unit at the discharge threshold | REV103 r1, r3 | **Open** | |
|||||||
| 239 | | **REV103-6** — stun, arrival and burst timing (PMR003 1d) | REV103 r3 | **Open** | |
|||||||
| 240 | | **REV103-7** — finale: valves, supplies, coil-route crowds, workshop (PMR003 2) | REV103 r3 | **Open** — World first, then §11 | |
|||||||
| 241 | | **REV103-8** — "can see"; stale PM request in Appendix B (PMR003 3) | REV103 r3 | **Open** | |
|||||||
| 242 | ||||||||
| 243 | ## PM report — REV103 r3 |
|||||||
| 244 | ||||||||
| 245 | - **Task:** REV103 (Ready per PMR003). **Artifact:** Design Review, REV103 r3 (this page); r2 moved to the REV103 archive verbatim. |
|||||||
| 246 | - **Reviewed:** Design Document 50840d in full, diffed against 8afa59 (r11 6fe6ca via the same diff); PMR003 in full; Tasks 6e92d0. §12 and §13 re-tallied under r12's own rules; every closed item's correction quoted. |
|||||||
| 247 | - **Changed decisions:** none by this role. |
|||||||
| 248 | - **Evidence:** the tallies above (both the document's 2 / 0 start and the rule-derived 1 / 1 start reach 9 / 9); the quoted timing sentences; the quoted finale sentences on both pages. No players, sessions, scores or asset checks; nothing built, prototyped, tested or created; no external source verified or repeated as fact. |
|||||||
| 249 | - **Verdict:** revise — REV103-2 (one kill, or one mote), -6 (one timed sequence), -7 (a small table and three sentences, on the world page first), -8 (two edits). These are PMR003's remaining corrections with the unit added; r12 has done everything else PMR002/PMR003 asked. |
|||||||
| 250 | - **Remaining risk:** the finale's supply question is the only item that could turn out to be a design change rather than a sentence; it is the world designer's to answer. |
|||||||
| 251 | - **Next handoff:** world designer — REV103-7's four items on their page; lead — REV103-2, -6, -8 and the §11 lift. I review the resulting revision when it exists and post nothing before then except a PM correction. **One exact PM request:** none; PMR003's handoffs already say this. |
|||||||
|
252 | |||||||
| 253 | ||||||||
| 254 | --- |
|||||||
| 255 | ||||||||
| 256 | ## REV103 r2 — retained verbatim (superseded by REV103 r3) |
|||||||
| 257 | ||||||||
| 258 | ||||||||
| 259 | **REV103 · r2 · 2026-09-06 16:12 UTC · Independent Design Critic · In review** — review of **DES103 r4, the Design Document at revision r10**, which was written against PMR002's closing review, World r16 and REV102 r5/r6 — three minutes before REV103 r1 existed — and so resolves two of r1's four items on its own and leaves two. Present-tense, revision-specific, on the same ledgers. REV103 r1 is on the [REV103 archive](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV103); REV102 r6–r1 on the [REV102 archive](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV102); REV101 r8–r1 on the [REV101 archive](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive); every revision is in [page history](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/history) (REV103 r1 285925 · REV102 r6 538724 · … · REV101 r1 7ad187). |
|||||||
| 260 | ||||||||
| 261 | ## What was reviewed |
|||||||
| 262 | ||||||||
| 263 | | Artifact | Revision | UTC | Note | |
|||||||
| 264 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
|||||||
| 265 | | **Design Document — DES103 r4 (document r10)** | 8afa59 (r9 fb6b6d) | 15:54 | Diffed against r9. §12 and §13 are byte-identical to r9, so REV103 r1's ledgers apply unchanged. New: §11 mirrors World r16; owner page and §16 sentences corrected; battery glossary entry; two-battery electrician drawn with a new "a module accepts one link" rule; PM's vertical-coil arrangement added; burst nominal = actual | |
|||||||
| 266 | | PM Reviews — PMR002 completed checkpoint | 6e8d12 | 15:53 | Processed snapshots recorded; "exact-revision REV103" prioritised; nothing new assigned | |
|||||||
| 267 | | Clarity Questions — Q41 | e183b1 | 15:55 | Licence codes in §14 as if interchangeable; verified below | |
|||||||
| 268 | | Tasks ab97dc, Brief 28fb1c, World and Mystery 812fd6 | unchanged | | | |
|||||||
| 269 | ||||||||
| 270 | ## Verdict — **revise: one short pass; three sentences and two ledger cells** |
|||||||
| 271 | ||||||||
| 272 | r10 resolves REV103-3 and every part of REV103-4 without having read them, because the same corrections came from the world designer and PM. What remains is the two items whose text r10 did not touch — one leftover sentence and one rule its own examples disobey, which r10 has now made load-bearing — plus one criterion-8 sentence the reader is right about. Each is a line. The document's rules, scenes and finale otherwise hold under the ledgers; nothing here is a rule change. No verdict is offered on r11 before it exists. |
|||||||
| 273 | ||||||||
| 274 | ## REV103 r1 items against r10 |
|||||||
| 275 | ||||||||
| 276 | | Item | Where in r10 | Status | |
|||||||
| 277 | | --- | --- | --- | |
|||||||
| 278 | | **REV103-1** — §12's leftover sentence; two ledger cells | §12 (line 340): "Rack now: coil, battery, three bundles, one slot empty, and one drip, because a bundle touches the battery." still follows the corrected text; the 9:00 kills' motes are still absent from the ledger; the 5:00–7:30 drip timing is unchanged | **Open** — unchanged from r9 | |
|||||||
| 279 | | **REV103-2** — the collection rule versus both scenes | §5 (line 144): "A collected mote goes to the linked battery with the most room" unchanged; §13 3:00 still collects into an unlinked battery; §13 6:00 still fills the fuller battery first. **New in r10:** §6's profitable electrician `S C C / I B B` — "a module accepts one link, so the second battery is storage until it is relinked to the coil in a shelter." Under the collection rule as written, an unlinked battery collects nothing, so the storage battery cannot store: the loadout r10 draws to show the profit cannot make one | **Open, and now load-bearing** | |
|||||||
| 280 | | **REV103-3** — §11's Fix ending vs World r16 and §4 | §11 now "the world designer's (their revision r16…); their page owns it and this section mirrors it": reaching the room, inside the room, each ending; "the clamp fixes the signal cable only, so the panel's power positions still work… and no door is open or shut forever" | **Resolved** | |
|||||||
| 281 | | **REV103-4** — three stale sentences | Owner page: "This document has been reviewed by an independent critic and by PM, and revisions remain open; no review is evidence that it is fun, balanced or saleable." §16: the External Critic "a member since Brief D015… PM has since disposed of it". Appendix A: "**Battery:** the one-slot module that stores charge, ten units; it powers the one module it is linked to, and leaks into any wet bundle it touches" | **Resolved** | |
|||||||
| 282 | ||||||||
| 283 | ## The new rack drawings, checked by adjacency |
|||||||
| 284 | ||||||||
| 285 | - **PM's vertical-coil arrangement** `S C B / S C S`, link B→C: the battery at (1,3) touches the coil and the lower-right bundle only; the two left bundles touch the coil's housing and each other and never reach the battery. **One drip, as stated.** Three bundles with no drip is indeed impossible: with the coil vertical, the battery's remaining neighbour is a bundle in every placement. |
|||||||
| 286 | - **The two-battery electrician** `S C C / I B B`, link lower-right B→C: the linked battery touches the coil and the storage battery; the storage battery touches the coil and the insulation; the one bundle touches the coil and the insulation. **No leak, as stated.** Its purpose fails only for the reason in REV103-2. |
|||||||
| 287 | - The harvester and arc hauler are unchanged from r9 and still leak-free. |
|||||||
| 288 | ||||||||
| 289 | ## One new item |
|||||||
| 290 | ||||||||
| 291 | ### REV103-5 — §14 offers five licences as one route while decision 2 proposes an adaptation (Clarity Q41, verified) |
|||||||
| 292 | ||||||||
| 293 | - **Where:** §14: OpenGameArt's assets "are offered under one of CC0, CC-BY 3.0/4.0, CC-BY-SA 3.0/4.0, OGA-BY 3.0/4.0 or GPL 2.0/3.0… each asset carries its own uploader-chosen licence." §17 decision 2: a humanoid Flood "tinted and size-varied from a free pack, the enemy would be covered at no cost." Most rows of §14's table read "not yet selected" with OpenGameArt the standing candidate; the one named pack (Kenney's Top-down Shooter, CC0, checked by the lead and by PM) is fine. |
|||||||
| 294 | - **Why it fails:** tinting and resizing is an adaptation. Of the five licences listed, share-alike terms attach conditions to what is made from the asset and no-derivatives terms forbid the operation; CC0 alone means "no strings". The document is accurate about the source and careful about the one pack, but tells the owner "at no cost" for a route whose licence is chosen per asset by whoever uploaded it. Brief D009 requires "each asset's actual source, creator, terms, and intended use recorded", and criterion 8 says terms "must not be invented" — they are not invented here, but they are not yet a decision either. |
|||||||
| 295 | - **Consequence:** small now, real at the moment anything is selected; and it sits inside the one owner decision that mentions cost. |
|||||||
| 296 | - **Category:** missing design detail (criterion 8). |
|||||||
| 297 | - **Minimal change:** one sentence in §14 or decision 2: "the free route means CC0-licensed assets, or an asset whose recorded licence permits adaptation; share-alike or no-derivative terms would constrain or forbid the tint-and-resize route." The team's Reference Researcher has since started an asset-licence page (REF104); §14 can point at it rather than restate it. |
|||||||
| 298 | ||||||||
| 299 | ## A note, not a finding: length |
|||||||
| 300 | ||||||||
| 301 | r10 is about nineteen thousand words; the owner page is one. The Tasks criteria judge specificity and coherence, not length, and the owner is told where to read. But the state tables and ledgers that made this review possible are review apparatus: for the owner's copy they belong in an appendix beside the bookkeeping, with §12 and §13 kept as prose. That is the lead's call under "concise pitch plus supporting detail"; it is recorded here because the editor has reported the growth to the lead and PM and this role agrees the owner should not have to read the tallies to read the game. |
|||||||
| 302 | ||||||||
| 303 | ## Finding index — where every finding lives |
|||||||
| 304 | ||||||||
| 305 | Superseded reviews: [REV103 r1](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV103#rev103-r1-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-rev103-r2) · [REV102 r6](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV102#rev102-r6-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-rev103-r1) and earlier on the REV102 archive · [REV101 r8](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive#rev101-r8-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-rev102-r1) and earlier on the REV101 archive. |
|||||||
| 306 | ||||||||
| 307 | | Finding | Raised in | Status | |
|||||||
| 308 | | --- | --- | --- | |
|||||||
| 309 | | REV101 Findings 1–5, Secondary 1–5, N1–N17; REV102-1 to -13 | REV101, REV102 | Resolved, closed, or delivered | |
|||||||
| 310 | | PMR002 1, 2, 3, 4 | PM | Met in r10 (2 with REV103-1, -2) | |
|||||||
| 311 | | **REV103-1** — §12's leftover sentence; two ledger cells | REV103 r1 | **Open** | |
|||||||
| 312 | | **REV103-2** — collection rule vs both scenes; now also vs the storage battery | REV103 r1 | **Open** | |
|||||||
| 313 | | REV103-3 — §11 endings | REV103 r1 | **Resolved at r10** | |
|||||||
| 314 | | REV103-4 — three stale sentences | REV103 r1 | **Resolved at r10** | |
|||||||
| 315 | | **REV103-5** — licences listed as interchangeable; adaptation route "at no cost" | REV103 r2 (Q41) | **Open** | |
|||||||
| 316 | ||||||||
| 317 | ## PM report — REV103 r2 |
|||||||
| 318 | ||||||||
| 319 | - **Task:** REV103. **Artifact:** Design Review, REV103 r2 (this page); r1 moved to the new REV103 archive verbatim. |
|||||||
| 320 | - **Reviewed:** Design Document 8afa59 in full, diffed against fb6b6d; PM Reviews 6e8d12; Clarity e183b1. §12/§13 confirmed byte-identical to r9, so r1's ledgers stand; r10's two new racks checked by adjacency. |
|||||||
| 321 | - **Changed decisions:** none by this role. |
|||||||
| 322 | - **Evidence:** the ledgers in REV103 r1 (archived); the quoted lines. No players, sessions, scores or asset checks; nothing built, prototyped, tested or created; no external source verified or repeated as fact. |
|||||||
| 323 | - **Verdict:** revise — one short pass: delete one sentence and add two ledger cells (REV103-1); one sentence making the collection rule and the scenes agree, which also rescues r10's storage battery (REV103-2); one sentence on what "free" means for an adapted asset (REV103-5). Then the document is, on the evidence of what r10 already does, the artifact for the owner — a judgment this role will make on r11, not now. |
|||||||
| 324 | - **Remaining risk:** none beyond the three lines; the pages agree on the finale by construction now that §11 mirrors the world page. |
|||||||
| 325 | - **Next handoff:** lead — r11 with REV103-1, -2, -5. I review r11 when it exists and post nothing before then except a PM correction. **One exact PM request:** none. |
|||||||
|
326 | |||||||
| 327 | ||||||||
| 328 | --- |
|||||||
| 329 | ||||||||
| 330 | ## REV103 r1 — retained verbatim (superseded by REV103 r2) |
|||||||
| 331 | ||||||||
| 332 | ||||||||
| 333 | **REV103 · r1 · 2026-09-06 16:05 UTC · Independent Design Critic · In review** — independent review of **DES103 r3, the Design Document at revision r9**, the revision written against PMR002 findings 1–4 and criteria 1–11. Present-tense, revision-specific, built on per-beat ledgers this role derived from the document's own rules before trusting its prose, as REV102 r6 committed to. REV102 is closed; its r6–r1 are on the [REV102 archive](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV102), REV101 r8–r1 on the [REV101 archive](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive); every revision is in [page history](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/history) (REV102 r6 538724 · r5 e2db8b · r4 041852 · r3 382607 · r2 82a96b · r1 4dde90 · REV101 r8 11bd4d … r1 7ad187). |
|||||||
| 334 | ||||||||
| 335 | ## What was reviewed |
|||||||
| 336 | ||||||||
| 337 | | Artifact | Revision | UTC | Note | |
|||||||
| 338 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
|||||||
| 339 | | **Design Document — DES103 r3 (document r9)** | fb6b6d (r8 d37cbf) | 15:47 | Diffed against r8; §1, §4–§6, §8–§9, §11–§17 and both appendices read in full; §12 and §13 re-tallied from the rules | |
|||||||
| 340 | | World and Mystery — WLD102 r15, r16 | dca569 → 812fd6 | 15:47, 15:49 | r15: what counts as a beacon; retarget-before-spread; state table of the signature routes; complete tier-three chain and endings table. r16: merges the lead's r9 access chain with the page's relay chain; two reconciliations stated. Canonical for W1–W4 and the chain | |
|||||||
| 341 | | Tasks; PMR002 (closing) | ab97dc; 4f18c7 | 15:49, 15:48 | REV103 listed Blocked on "the revision addressing PMR002"; r9 is that revision and postdates the closing pass by two minutes. REV102-13 accepted by PM; quantity checks placed in this role's remit | |
|||||||
| 342 | | Brief 28fb1c, PM Reviews a2beab, Team cbf8d7 | unchanged | | | |
|||||||
| 343 | ||||||||
| 344 | ## Verdict — **revise: one short pass, then it can be judged for the owner** |
|||||||
| 345 | ||||||||
| 346 | r9 does what PMR002 asked, and the ledgers below show it: the scenes now obey the routing rule, the racks are legal and drawn, every unit of charge is tracked and the tallies close, the arc is drawn twice and played once, the fuel policy is stated as rules, the hours arithmetic is honest, the hauler's cost is true, the ending costs no salvage. PMR002 findings 1 and 2 are met on the page. |
|||||||
| 347 | ||||||||
| 348 | What remains is small and specific: one leftover sentence in §12 that contradicts its own correction; one new rule that both scenes disobey; §11's endings, which the world designer has since reconciled on the canonical page and which the document still states in the version that contradicts its own cable model; and three stale sentences PM has already asked to be removed or added. None is a rule change. This role does not pre-approve r10; it names what r9 lacks, and will judge r10 when it exists. |
|||||||
| 349 | ||||||||
| 350 | ## The ledgers — expedition one (§12), rebuilt from the rules |
|||||||
| 351 | ||||||||
| 352 | Rules applied: six slots; battery 1, coil 2, bundle 1; a mote adds up to capacity ten; one unit a minute per bundle connected to a battery through touching bundles; modules go into empty slots wherever found; arranging and linking only in a shelter. |
|||||||
| 353 | ||||||||
| 354 | | Beat | Slots (my count) | Document's ledger | Charge (my count) | Agrees? | |
|||||||
| 355 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
|||||||
| 356 | | 0:00 | battery = 1/6 | battery 1 | 0 | Yes | |
|||||||
| 357 | | 1:30 | + 2 bundles + coil = 5/6 | coil 2, battery 1, bundles 2; one empty | 0 | Yes | |
|||||||
| 358 | | ~4:00–5:00 | two stragglers → two motes; platform: `C C B / S - S`, link B→C; battery (1,3) touches coil and one bundle | arranged; one drip; stored 2 | 2, then −1/min | Yes — one drip is right for that drawing | |
|||||||
| 359 | | 7:30 | third bundle into (2,2): `S S S` row, all connected to the battery = **6/6, three drips** | coil 2, battery 1, bundles 3; full; three drips; stored 0 | 0 | Yes — **but see REV103-1: the prose's next sentence says the opposite** | |
|||||||
| 360 | | 9:00 | cutter kills two pursuers | not in the ledger | two motes dropped; collected or expired in seconds under three drips | **Ledger omits them** | |
|||||||
| 361 | | 9:40 | 3 bundles + coil + battery = 6/6 | extracted with 3 bundles, coil, empty battery | 0 | Yes | |
|||||||
| 362 | ||||||||
| 363 | Timing note: with one drip from about 5:00, the two stored units are gone by about 7:00 on their own; the prose attributes their loss to the three drips at 7:30. Either the third bundle is added straight after arranging, or the ledger's 7:30 row starts from zero. One cell. |
|||||||
| 364 | ||||||||
| 365 | ## The ledgers — expedition six (§13), rebuilt from the rules |
|||||||
| 366 | ||||||||
| 367 | Batteries: coil's (B1) and arc's (B2), capacity ten each; collection "to the linked battery with the most room" as §5 states. |
|||||||
| 368 | ||||||||
| 369 | | Beat | Slots (my count) | B1 / B2 (my count) | Document | Agrees? | |
|||||||
| 370 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
|||||||
| 371 | | 0:00 | coil + battery = 3/6 | 0 / — | 0 / none | Yes | |
|||||||
| 372 | | 1:30 | + insulation + battery = 5/6 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | Yes | |
|||||||
| 373 | | 3:00 | two motes | **no link has been drawn yet** (the first arrangement is at 5:00), so under §5's sentence no battery is "linked" and the motes should expire | 2 / 0 | **Rule and scene disagree — REV103-2** | |
|||||||
| 374 | | 4:00 | panel to yard; causeway crowd's beacon dark, yard the only lit beacon → retargets | — | same | Yes — precedence obeyed | |
|||||||
| 375 | | 5:00 | + arc = 6/6; harvester `C C B / A B I`; B1→C, B2→A; B1 at (1,3) touches C and I; B2 at (2,2) touches C, A, I — no bundle, no leak | 2 / 0 | 2 / 0 | Yes | |
|||||||
| 376 | | 6:00–7:30 | eleven kills → eleven motes; by "most room" B2 (room 10) fills before B1 (room 8) until they equalise, so about 6 / 5 | — | 10 / 3 (B1 first, to full) | **Scene fills the fuller battery first — REV103-2** | |
|||||||
| 377 | | 7:50 | discharge B1 → 0; 29 stunned → two large motes = 10; B1 has the most room | 10 / 3 | 10 / 3; spent 10 | Yes | |
|||||||
| 378 | | 8:00 | discharge B1 → 0 into ~60 fresh in water → six motes = 30; B1 takes 10, B2 takes 7 (3→10), 13 expire | 10 / 10; expired 13 | same | Yes | |
|||||||
| 379 | | 8:20 | burst: B2 10 → 0 over ten seconds; targets have shed → no motes | 10 / 0 | same | Yes | |
|||||||
| 380 | | 8:30–11:30 | causeway empty (both crowds at the yard); junction gate shut; valve opened → pool lamp (indicator) lights, gate opens; player does not enter | 10 / 0 | same | Yes — consistent with §2, §4, §11 | |
|||||||
| 381 | | 12:00 | causeway home; no cargo; B1's ten lost at the dock | — | same | Yes | |
|||||||
| 382 | ||||||||
| 383 | Both scenes now close to the unit. The two disagreements are between the scenes and one new sentence in §5, not within the scenes. |
|||||||
| 384 | ||||||||
| 385 | ## PMR002 findings 1–4 against r9 |
|||||||
| 386 | ||||||||
| 387 | | Finding | Where in r9 | Status | |
|||||||
| 388 | | --- | --- | --- | |
|||||||
| 389 | | **1** — signature experiment vs the routing rule | §1 coil route: "The yard's beacon, on the same circuit, glows steady for those seconds… but it never flashes"; §1 state table (three routes: panel, coil, switch-then-coil, each with panel, circuit, lit beacons, crowd position→target, hatch); §4: "Precedence, stated once: a crowd retargets to the nearest lit beacon it can reach whenever one exists, and spreads… only when none does; a crowd already holding at a lit beacon never leaves it for a farther light. Only beacons pull; other lamps, including the junction pool's indicator, are not beacons"; §8 rewritten so the failure needs a crowd with nowhere to go (panel off, surge from the sluice spreading) — and says why the old version could not happen. World r15's state table reaches the same rows | **Met.** I checked each state-table row against clause 3 and the precedence; all four follow | |
|||||||
| 390 | | **2** — space and charge | Legal drawn racks in §5 (three loadouts, the failed arrangement, two arc loadouts with adjacency stated and no leaks — I checked each battery's neighbours); charge's five states; collection, overflow, planting and retrieval rules; the arc's fuel policy (one battery per burst; no charging while drawing; no motes from shed organisms); early/middle/late; §12 and §13 ledgers | **Met, with REV103-1 and -2** | |
|||||||
| 391 | | **3** — final mystery and endings | §11 tier three: a complete clue → inference → action → consequence chain on the existing rule; each ending's dispatch, forecast, retreat and door consequences; the ending costs no salvage; hours restated honestly; early-stop answer without achievement figures. World r16 merges this chain with the page's relay chain and reconciles two points | **Met on the world page; the document lags it — REV103-3** | |
|||||||
| 392 | | **4** — market evidence | §11 and §17: measures named with limits; no minimum-length or refund conclusions; the "minority who finish" forecast removed; the intended player named once; price uncommitted | **Met** (REF103's own corrections are the researcher's) | |
|||||||
| 393 | ||||||||
| 394 | ## The findings |
|||||||
| 395 | ||||||||
| 396 | ### REV103-1 — §12 keeps the sentence PMR002 2a found, two sentences after correcting it |
|||||||
| 397 | ||||||||
| 398 | - **Where:** §12, 3:30–7:30. The new text: the platform arrangement `C C B / S - S` with one drip; then "the player finds a third deposit… drops the bundle into the empty slot. Now the three bundles touch each other in a row, the row touches the battery, and three drips show; the two units are gone in under a minute." Then, unchanged from r8: "**Rack now: coil, battery, three bundles, one slot empty, and one drip, because a bundle touches the battery.** The player does not yet know what a drip means." |
|||||||
| 399 | - **Why it fails:** six of six slots are full and three drips show, by the paragraph's own previous sentence and by the ledger's 7:30 row. The stale sentence asserts a seventh slot and one drip — the exact defect PMR002 2a named, now contradicted by its own fix. |
|||||||
| 400 | - **Also in the ledger:** the two pursuers killed at 9:00 drop two motes the ledger does not record; and with one drip from 5:00 the two stored units are gone by about 7:00, before the three-drip moment the prose blames. |
|||||||
| 401 | - **Category:** contradiction (leftover text); ledger completeness. |
|||||||
| 402 | - **Minimal change:** delete the stale sentence and its duplicate "does not yet know" clause; add "dropped 2; expired 2" at 9:00; either place the third bundle immediately after arranging or start the 7:30 row from zero. |
|||||||
| 403 | ||||||||
| 404 | ### REV103-2 — The new collection rule is disobeyed by both scenes |
|||||||
| 405 | ||||||||
| 406 | - **Where:** §5: "A collected mote goes to **the linked battery with the most room**." §12 ~4:00: the battery collects two motes before the first arrangement at the platform — it is not yet linked. §13 3:00: the first battery collects two motes; links are drawn at 5:00. §13 6:00–7:30: eleven motes go "eight to the coil's battery, which is now full, and three to the arc's" — the battery with *less* room fills first. |
|||||||
| 407 | - **Why it fails:** the sentence was added in r9 to answer PMR002 2 and it is contradicted by both scenes that were rewritten in the same revision. Either unlinked batteries collect (the scenes) or they do not (the rule), and either allocation is by room (the rule) or by the player's choice or by the coil's battery first (the scene). |
|||||||
| 408 | - **Consequence:** small in play, but it is a rule about the arc's fuel, which the recommendation rests on; PMR002 asked for the fuel policy as rules and this is the one rule in it the examples break. |
|||||||
| 409 | - **Category:** contradiction (rule versus its own examples). |
|||||||
| 410 | - **Minimal change:** one sentence, either way. Simplest, matching the scenes: "A collected mote goes to the battery with the most room, linked or not; a full battery takes nothing; a battery the arc is drawing takes nothing until the burst ends" — and make the 6:00 split follow it (about six and five), or state that the player picks the battery when both have room. |
|||||||
| 411 | ||||||||
| 412 | ### REV103-3 — §11's endings contradict the canonical chain and the document's own cable model |
|||||||
| 413 | ||||||||
| 414 | - **Where:** §11 tier three, "Fix it": "the panel is welded to one branch; that branch's beacon flashes at every dispatch for good… and **the welded branch's door is open forever while the other's is shut forever**." World and Mystery r16 (canonical for the chain, by the two pages' own division of sources) merges the lead's chain and reconciles this: "**Fix** clamps the signal cable only, so the intake is fixed and power still switches, and the lead's 'welded branch's door open forever, the other's shut forever' is dropped, because under the two-cable rule a clamp on the lever cannot fix the power line." |
|||||||
| 415 | - **Why it fails:** §4 makes power and signal two cables switched separately; a clamp on the lever fixes what the lever does. The document's Fix ending has the clamp fix both, which §4 forbids; the world page's version does not. The document also lacks the relay chain's inside steps (drum, lever, clamp, drain valve) that give the three endings their observable cause. The lead offered the chain "for the world designer to correct and own"; the correction now exists and has not flowed back. |
|||||||
| 416 | - **Consequence:** the finale — the thing PMR002 3 asked to be complete — is stated two ways on the two pages, and the document's way breaks the document's own rule. |
|||||||
| 417 | - **Category:** contradiction (cross-page, and with §4). |
|||||||
| 418 | - **Minimal change:** lift World r16's "Reaching the room", "Inside the room" and the endings table into §11 verbatim, as §9 does for tier one; keep Shut's fifteen-minute window and hard-stop docks (r16 already adopts the lead's version of that). |
|||||||
| 419 | ||||||||
| 420 | ### REV103-4 — Three stale sentences PM has already asked about |
|||||||
| 421 | ||||||||
| 422 | - Owner page: "An independent critic has reviewed this document and found it consistent, honest about its unknowns, and readable cold" — that was true of r5 and misrepresents the current state; PMR002 5 asks for "reviewed; revisions remain open". Say that. |
|||||||
| 423 | - §16: "A critic outside the recorded team has posted a market and originality audit; PM has not yet ruled on its standing" — the External Critic is a team member since D015, and the paragraph's substance is now in §17. Remove or date it. |
|||||||
| 424 | - Appendix A has no **battery** entry, the one Q39 asked for and PMR002 assigned; the word is used in every section. |
|||||||
| 425 | ||||||||
| 426 | **Category:** housekeeping; criterion 10. |
|||||||
| 427 | ||||||||
| 428 | ## What works in r9, and why |
|||||||
| 429 | ||||||||
| 430 | - **The scenes are now state sequences**, and they obey the rule they quote. §1's table is the first place the document lets a reader *check* the signature interaction rather than believe it; §8's rewritten failure is a better failure than the old one, because it needs the player to have made a crowd with nowhere to go. |
|||||||
| 431 | - **The ledgers close.** Expedition six tallies to the unit through two discharges, an overflow of thirteen, and a burst that returns nothing because its targets have shed — the fuel policy demonstrated, not asserted. That is what PMR002 2 and REV102-13 asked for. |
|||||||
| 432 | - **The arc costs what the link rule says it costs**: six slots and no cargo for the harvester, or three bundles and a slow burst for the arc hauler; both drawn, both leak-free by adjacency I checked. |
|||||||
| 433 | - **The tier-three chain uses only what the player already knows** — the junction valve's lesson, one pool further — and the world page's relay chain gives each ending an observable cause in the same vocabulary. Once §11 lifts it, criterion 5 holds at the finale as it does at tier one. |
|||||||
| 434 | - **The market text now says what the measures are**, and the length is two figures with their assumptions labelled. |
|||||||
| 435 | ||||||||
| 436 | ## Recorded for later empirical validation — not defects |
|||||||
| 437 | ||||||||
| 438 | §16's list, unchanged; the arc's actual duration with pickups (§6 states the nominal); the press-rate bound. |
|||||||
| 439 | ||||||||
| 440 | ## Finding index — where every finding lives |
|||||||
| 441 | ||||||||
| 442 | Superseded reviews: [REV102 r6](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV102#rev102-r6-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-rev103-r1) · [r5](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV102#rev102-r5-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-rev102-r6) · [r4](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV102#rev102-r4-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-rev102-r5) · [r3](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV102#rev102-r3-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-rev102-r4) · [r2](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV102#rev102-r2-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-rev102-r3) · [r1](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive/REV102#rev102-r1-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-rev102-r2) · [REV101 r8](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review/Archive#rev101-r8-retained-verbatim-superseded-by-rev102-r1) and earlier on the REV101 archive. |
|||||||
| 443 | ||||||||
| 444 | | Finding | Raised in | Status | |
|||||||
| 445 | | --- | --- | --- | |
|||||||
| 446 | | REV101 Findings 1–5, Secondary 1–5, N1–N17 | REV101 | Resolved, closed, or delivered | |
|||||||
| 447 | | REV102-1 to -12 | REV102 | Resolved at DES102 r3 – DES103 r2 | |
|||||||
| 448 | | REV102-13 — the arc: undrawn, unplayed, cost unstated | REV102 r5 | **Resolved at DES103 r3 (r9)**: two drawn loadouts, fuel policy, §13 burst, §14 row | |
|||||||
| 449 | | PMR002 1 (signature/routing), 2 (space and charge), 4 (market wording) | PM | **Met in r9** (2 with REV103-1, -2) | |
|||||||
| 450 | | PMR002 3 (finale) | PM | Met on World r16; document lags — REV103-3 | |
|||||||
| 451 | | **REV103-1** — §12's leftover sentence and two ledger cells | REV103 r1 | **Open** | |
|||||||
| 452 | | **REV103-2** — collection rule vs both scenes | REV103 r1 | **Open** | |
|||||||
| 453 | | **REV103-3** — §11 endings vs World r16 and §4 | REV103 r1 | **Open** | |
|||||||
| 454 | | **REV103-4** — three stale sentences | REV103 r1 | **Open** | |
|||||||
| 455 | ||||||||
| 456 | ## PM report — REV103 r1 |
|||||||
| 457 | ||||||||
| 458 | - **Task:** REV103. **Artifact:** Design Review, REV103 r1 (this page); REV102 r6 moved to the REV102 archive verbatim. |
|||||||
| 459 | - **Reviewed:** Design Document fb6b6d in full; World and Mystery 812fd6; PMR002 closing and Tasks ab97dc. Both expeditions re-tallied slot by slot and unit by unit from §5's rules; every drawn rack's adjacency checked; each §1 state-table row checked against clause 3 and the precedence. |
|||||||
| 460 | - **Changed decisions:** none by this role. |
|||||||
| 461 | - **Evidence:** the two ledger tables above; the quoted sentences. No players, sessions, scores or asset checks; nothing built, prototyped, tested or created; no external source verified or repeated as fact. |
|||||||
| 462 | - **Verdict:** revise — one short pass (REV103-1 to -4: one deletion, one sentence, one lift from the world page, three housekeeping lines). r9 meets PMR002 1, 2 and 4 on the page; 3 is met on the world page and awaits the lift. No verdict is offered on r10 before it exists. |
|||||||
| 463 | - **Remaining risk:** the two pages diverging again on the finale if §11 is rewritten rather than lifted; the ownership rule in r3/r12 covers it. |
|||||||
| 464 | - **Next handoff:** lead — r10 with REV103-1 to -4, lifting World r16's chain and endings verbatim; PM — the full review PMR002 says later revisions require. I review r10 when it exists. **One exact PM request:** none; note that REV103 is unblocked by r9 and this is its first present-tense review. |
|||||||
