Blame

b9503a Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:14:02
Outcome 36: crosswalk of 8 chains and 15 primary scenes to actual rooms/controls/evidence, 19-entry deduplicated evidence ledger, commit boundaries, two order traces with four contrary cases, integration handoff
1
# Hold The Horde — Campaign Evidence and State Crosswalk
2
69c86d Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:35:06
Response to critique 529 / PM 531: ledger completed to 26 entries, room corrections (R03/R18, ledger as carried object), seal fact split from testimony, many-to-many chain mapping, both Regional25 dependency orders, identifier provenance audit, state wording corrections, Mechanical35 endpoints
3
**Status.** A finite index over content that already exists: it maps the eight accepted chains and fifteen primary cast scenes onto the actual rooms, controls, objects and observations they consume, and records where those interfaces agree or conflict. It is **not** a campaign map, a scheduler, new content, story truth, language grammar or a validation of anything. No new chain, person, room, mechanism, scene or object is created here. All five owner questions remain unanswered, and only their actual consumers are marked conditional.
b9503a Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:14:02
Outcome 36: crosswalk of 8 chains and 15 primary scenes to actual rooms/controls/evidence, 19-entry deduplicated evidence ledger, commit boundaries, two order traces with four contrary cases, integration handoff
4
69c86d Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:35:06
Response to critique 529 / PM 531: ledger completed to 26 entries, room corrections (R03/R18, ledger as carried object), seal fact split from testimony, many-to-many chain mapping, both Regional25 dependency orders, identifier provenance audit, state wording corrections, Mechanical35 endpoints
5
**Sources read live for this revision, with full hashes.**
b9503a Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:14:02
Outcome 36: crosswalk of 8 chains and 15 primary scenes to actual rooms/controls/evidence, 19-entry deduplicated evidence ledger, commit boundaries, two order traces with four contrary cases, integration handoff
6
69c86d Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:35:06
Response to critique 529 / PM 531: ledger completed to 26 entries, room corrections (R03/R18, ledger as carried object), seal fact split from testimony, many-to-many chain mapping, both Regional25 dependency orders, identifier provenance audit, state wording corrections, Mechanical35 endpoints
7
| Source | SHA-256 | Bytes |
8
|---|---|---|
9
| Brief | `4b0a3bcbc339029c682b287c1ea25ee2f721066f68d8b27774874e8cd15808e4` | 8,611 |
10
| Two Language Discovery Map | `df0f48f5bd39659105ca5e3b31e7341e4d0a8b36618a7eaed8f60d7120038a0a` | 27,233 |
11
| Story and Ending Map | `03c9cb8ee95564f08cf59b065f97c0a008981a489f8a8b223df0048d4cfb6de9` | 32,012 |
12
| Cast and Short Rescue Map | `61ff0b968ebadbde6a670a753caf5e5cb5d70d54bb27995d6222a3a49ea25e79` | 27,882 |
13
| Regional Discovery Map | `3acda0183b13d531e5e93cfd7ef41909c33b19d970bdb4b0b3c01f4360427247` | 22,495 |
14
| Station Room and Module Inventory | `011a4f7ba0d3b93d599ce83dc71429ed352e46546da2067cc690aacf33db5648` (Systems 528 revision) | 62,607 |
15
| Encounter and Mechanism Placement Inventory | `4b40819edce940526fa5b1687840651652b2acc7010379f2df1b9a5ed232d41a` (Systems 528 revision) | 60,205 |
16
| Save and Content State | `c4cf4abd17b92d6fb61cff49b35ea6546acdc9b5167ceeff501a5f43ebb8cb7f` (Systems 528 revision) | 20,039 |
17
| Death Shift and Rescue Continuity | `2ccdd7b3f7245dce3638caa91bd19697f215ebc2a4ab795c1f91531128044c48` (Systems 528 revision) | 42,694 |
18
| Player Information and Options | `b49da2c8fd2cbbcb84b89647237fe92d7307e8a6526db48179bd5fa4acbaef68` (Systems 528 revision) | 32,141 |
19
| Home and Colony Loop | `116662061a227c06f0100007d7fd1a648b9d3e9980dc3171091ef9476d14e206` (Systems 528 revision) | 25,159 |
20
| Mechanical Interfaces and Opening Quantities | `2e604fc2f31cf044237ae622658a110f34f2d40f4793f9f1bba455ef6c21697e` | 44,079 |
b9503a Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:14:02
Outcome 36: crosswalk of 8 chains and 15 primary scenes to actual rooms/controls/evidence, 19-entry deduplicated evidence ledger, commit boundaries, two order traces with four contrary cases, integration handoff
21
69c86d Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:35:06
Response to critique 529 / PM 531: ledger completed to 26 entries, room corrections (R03/R18, ledger as carried object), seal fact split from testimony, many-to-many chain mapping, both Regional25 dependency orders, identifier provenance audit, state wording corrections, Mechanical35 endpoints
22
**Intervening revisions, stated rather than hidden.** Six of these moved under the Systems 528 alignment while this article was stopped. Every room, control and object fact cited below was re-verified against the **new** revisions; the R03, R13, R18, R19, R32 and R36 rows this article depends on are unchanged by those edits. Where a Systems edit later changes a cited passage, the finding here is what needs rechecking, not the identity map.
23
24
**Counts.** 8 chains (L1–L4, S1–S4) · 15 primary scenes (Y1–Y3, A1–A3, D1–D3, M1–M3, I1–I3) · **26 deduplicated evidence entries** · 7 mutually exclusive rescue host variants · 5 Story30 personal variants · 2 dependency orders. Existing inventories are unchanged: 24 modules / 40 rooms, 10 encounters including 2 setpieces, 13 major mechanisms.
25
26
## 0. Identifier provenance
27
28
**Canonical, cited to their owners:** chain IDs L1–L4 (Two Language Discovery Map), S1–S4 (Story and Ending Map), scene IDs Y1–I3 (Cast and Short Rescue Map), room IDs R01–R40 and module IDs M01–M24 (Station Room and Module Inventory), objective numbers 1–12 (Regional Discovery Map).
b9503a Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:14:02
Outcome 36: crosswalk of 8 chains and 15 primary scenes to actual rooms/controls/evidence, 19-entry deduplicated evidence ledger, commit boundaries, two order traces with four contrary cases, integration handoff
29
69c86d Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:35:06
Response to critique 529 / PM 531: ledger completed to 26 entries, room corrections (R03/R18, ledger as carried object), seal fact split from testimony, many-to-many chain mapping, both Regional25 dependency orders, identifier provenance audit, state wording corrections, Mechanical35 endpoints
30
**Not canonical:** every `A-…` evidence key below. **Language29 defines no evidence keys at all**, and neither does any other parent. An earlier draft of this page implied two classes — that `E-…` keys were canonical and only `X-…` keys were invented — and that was wrong: **all of them are locally invented indexing aliases created by this article**, and every one carries a proposed source owner. Nothing here renumbers or renames an established room, scene, chain, module or objective identity, and no parent needs to adopt these keys for its own text to be correct.
31
32
## 1. Chain and scene identity map
b9503a Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:14:02
Outcome 36: crosswalk of 8 chains and 15 primary scenes to actual rooms/controls/evidence, 19-entry deduplicated evidence ledger, commit boundaries, two order traces with four contrary cases, integration handoff
33
34
| ID | Owning description | Rooms / controls | Evidence consumed |
35
|---|---|---|---|
69c86d Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:35:06
Response to critique 529 / PM 531: ledger completed to 26 entries, room corrections (R03/R18, ledger as carried object), seal fact split from testimony, many-to-many chain mapping, both Regional25 dependency orders, identifier provenance audit, state wording corrections, Mechanical35 endpoints
36
| **L1** Which main ends here? | Language29 chain 1 | R14, R15, R16; the two service mains | `A-RUNS`, `A-TAAN` |
37
| **L2** What is behind the marked wall? | Language29 chain 2 | R04, R15 edge, R17, R26 slab | `A-WALLMARK` |
38
| **L3** Which end receives? | Language29 chain 3 | R21, R22, R23 one-way fixtures | `A-TRANSFER` |
39
| **L4** Does the line answer? | Language29 chain 4 | R28–R30 racks and reply niche; R36 inlet plate/reply face | `A-AB`, `A-ADDRESS`, `A-REPLY` |
40
| **S1** The berth that remembers | Story30 chain 1 | R03 staged fasteners; R02 installed Fork; ship berth | `A-BERTH`, `A-MANIFEST`, `A-INSTALLED`, `A-BEDSIDE` |
41
| **S2** The harmful profile | Story30 chain 2 | R13 ward machine, R19 comparison bay, R28 regulators, R40 coupling | `A-WARDLOG`, `A-WARDID`, `A-PROFILE`, `A-CARD`, `A-TREAT`, `A-REPLY` |
42
| **S3** The last transfer | Story30 chain 3 | R18 destination drawer/card and ratchet; ship table/receiver | `A-WALLLOG`, `A-LEDGER`, `A-R18SEAL`, `A-SEALACCOUNT`, `A-CYCLE`, `A-TRANSFER` |
43
| **S4** What the core contains | Story30 chain 4 | R28–R30 reply, R32 notes, R36 iris/strip, R39 cell, R40 isolation | `A-REPLY`, `A-CORENOTES`, `A-STRIP`, `A-CELL`, `A-ISOLATION`, `A-TREAT` |
44
| **Y1** The wall must come | Cast31 | R13 if Yeva-first, else R19 annex; one junction; R12 abort | `A-WALLLOG` |
b9503a Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:14:02
Outcome 36: crosswalk of 8 chains and 15 primary scenes to actual rooms/controls/evidence, 19-entry deduplicated evidence ledger, commit boundaries, two order traces with four contrary cases, integration handoff
45
| **Y2** The dark bench | Cast31; Home28 projects 1/2 | Ship bench, inherited compressor head/housing | — (state, not evidence) |
69c86d Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:35:06
Response to critique 529 / PM 531: ledger completed to 26 entries, room corrections (R03/R18, ledger as carried object), seal fact split from testimony, many-to-many chain mapping, both Regional25 dependency orders, identifier provenance audit, state wording corrections, Mechanical35 endpoints
46
| **Y3** The profile is not the person | Cast31; Story30 variant 2 | Ship | `A-PROFILE` |
b9503a Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:14:02
Outcome 36: crosswalk of 8 chains and 15 primary scenes to actual rooms/controls/evidence, 19-entry deduplicated evidence ledger, commit boundaries, two order traces with four contrary cases, integration handoff
47
| **A1** Lock behind me | Cast31 | R13 if Aster-first, else R22 booth; R24 or R12 abort | — |
69c86d Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:35:06
Response to critique 529 / PM 531: ledger completed to 26 entries, room corrections (R03/R18, ledger as carried object), seal fact split from testimony, many-to-many chain mapping, both Regional25 dependency orders, identifier provenance audit, state wording corrections, Mechanical35 endpoints
48
| **A2** Count only what we have | Cast31; Home28 project 3 | Ship ledger table | `A-LEDGER` |
49
| **A3** This docking, perhaps | Cast31; Story30 variant 1 | Ship berth/table | `A-BERTH`, `A-MANIFEST` |
50
| **D1** Keep the section shut? | Cast31 | R18, R17 approach, R12 abort; hoist control seat | `A-R18SEAL`, `A-SEALACCOUNT` |
b9503a Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:14:02
Outcome 36: crosswalk of 8 chains and 15 primary scenes to actual rooms/controls/evidence, 19-entry deduplicated evidence ledger, commit boundaries, two order traces with four contrary cases, integration handoff
51
| **D2** Two leads, one Fork | Cast31; Coming Home, Home28 1/2 | Ship receiver/bench | — |
69c86d Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:35:06
Response to critique 529 / PM 531: ledger completed to 26 entries, room corrections (R03/R18, ledger as carried object), seal fact split from testimony, many-to-many chain mapping, both Regional25 dependency orders, identifier provenance audit, state wording corrections, Mechanical35 endpoints
52
| **D3** What crossed | Cast31; Story30 variant 4 | Ship ledger table/receiver | `A-WALLLOG`, `A-LEDGER`, `A-SEALACCOUNT`, `A-CYCLE` |
53
| **M1** Clean side | Cast31 | R26 booth, R27 clean abort; rack seal | `A-RACK` |
b9503a Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:14:02
Outcome 36: crosswalk of 8 chains and 15 primary scenes to actual rooms/controls/evidence, 19-entry deduplicated evidence ledger, commit boundaries, two order traces with four contrary cases, integration handoff
54
| **M2** Catch, don't spend | Cast31; Home28 project 4 | Ship material tray/cradle | — |
69c86d Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:35:06
Response to critique 529 / PM 531: ledger completed to 26 entries, room corrections (R03/R18, ledger as carried object), seal fact split from testimony, many-to-many chain mapping, both Regional25 dependency orders, identifier provenance audit, state wording corrections, Mechanical35 endpoints
55
| **M3** A machine made this | Cast31; Story30 variant 3 | Ship tray/evidence shelf | `A-PROFILE`, `A-ISOLATION` |
b9503a Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:14:02
Outcome 36: crosswalk of 8 chains and 15 primary scenes to actual rooms/controls/evidence, 19-entry deduplicated evidence ledger, commit boundaries, two order traces with four contrary cases, integration handoff
56
| **I1** My pace | Cast31 | R05 bay, R06 braced alcove; approach plate | — |
57
| **I2** Two actual passes | Cast31; Home28 project 5 | Ship gait rail | — |
69c86d Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:35:06
Response to critique 529 / PM 531: ledger completed to 26 entries, room corrections (R03/R18, ledger as carried object), seal fact split from testimony, many-to-many chain mapping, both Regional25 dependency orders, identifier provenance audit, state wording corrections, Mechanical35 endpoints
58
| **I3** Ask before treatment | Cast31; Story30 variant 5 | Ship | `A-TREAT` |
59
60
**Scenes carry chain positions many-to-many.** Story30 does not allocate its personal variants exclusively to one chain each, and reading them as 1:1 was an error in the earlier draft:
61
62
| Scene | Story30 variant | Chain positions it carries |
63
|---|---|---|
64
| A3 | 1 | S1 |
65
| Y3 | 2 | S2 |
66
| M3 | 3 | **S2 and S4** — preserving a trace before a live feed is disconnected is evidence stewardship about the profile *and* about the isolation act |
67
| D3 | 4 | S3 |
68
| I3 | 5 | **S2 and S4** — the consent boundary concerns the treatment *and* the core branch that Story30 names in its chain-4 human paragraph |
b9503a Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:14:02
Outcome 36: crosswalk of 8 chains and 15 primary scenes to actual rooms/controls/evidence, 19-entry deduplicated evidence ledger, commit boundaries, two order traces with four contrary cases, integration handoff
69
69c86d Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:35:06
Response to critique 529 / PM 531: ledger completed to 26 entries, room corrections (R03/R18, ledger as carried object), seal fact split from testimony, many-to-many chain mapping, both Regional25 dependency orders, identifier provenance audit, state wording corrections, Mechanical35 endpoints
70
**Host variants (7).** R13 hosts Y1 **or** A1, never both; the other person takes R19 pressure annex (Yeva) or R22 supply booth (Aster). Abort hosts are the four already counted rooms — R06, R12, R24, R27 — and no scene adds a fifth.
b9503a Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:14:02
Outcome 36: crosswalk of 8 chains and 15 primary scenes to actual rooms/controls/evidence, 19-entry deduplicated evidence ledger, commit boundaries, two order traces with four contrary cases, integration handoff
71
72
## 2. Deduplicated evidence and knowledge ledger
73
69c86d Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:35:06
Response to critique 529 / PM 531: ledger completed to 26 entries, room corrections (R03/R18, ledger as carried object), seal fact split from testimony, many-to-many chain mapping, both Regional25 dependency orders, identifier provenance audit, state wording corrections, Mechanical35 endpoints
74
One entry per observation; a shared observation is listed once with its separate consumers. All keys are local aliases (§0).
75
76
| Key | Host and action | Fact vs interpretation | Current or dated | Cannot prove | Who knows, and how | Consumers |
77
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
78
| `A-RUNS` | R14/R15: read which main ends, which crosses | Fact: which main terminates. Interpretation: order means purpose | Dated capture | That the rule generalises | Player; **Yeva may name the crew roads** when shown a record | L1 |
79
| `A-TAAN` | R16: bare string over a stair-only vestibule | Fact: string and room type | Dated capture | That it is not a damaged run | Player | L1 |
80
| `A-WALLMARK` | R04, R15 edge, R17, R26 slab: strings beside panels/slabs | Fact: string, panel state, whether a crawl is continuous | Dated capture; **passability is current-only** | That any marked wall is passable now | Player; **Dorn may describe crew crawl-mark use** when shown a record | L2 |
81
| `A-TRANSFER` | R21/R23 operate a pair; R22 receiving fitting | Fact: physical drive/fill direction | Dated capture | That a pair implies a walkable route | Player | L3, S3 |
82
| `A-AB` | R14, R15, R21, R22, R23: five pulled/intact contrasts | Fact: plate state beside a physical change | Dated capture | Whether A means completed, requested or foretold | Player | L4 |
83
| `A-ADDRESS` | R14, R15, R23 workstations: fitting token in the first slot | Fact: token recurrence | Dated capture | That the register has one grammar | Player | L4 |
84
| `A-REPLY` | R28–R30 chronology and reply protocol; R36 inlet plate/reply face | Fact: the line responds to a named act | Response **current**; chronology dated | That a responder is a person | Player; no survivor reads either script | L4, S2, S4 |
85
| `A-CORENOTES` | R32: layered human notes calling the core patient, engine, prisoner | Fact: the notes and their layering | Dated | Which account is right; layering is not chronology unless physically evidenced | Player | S4 |
86
| `A-CELL` | R39: deep evidence cell behind the opened iris | Fact: what is physically there | Dated capture | Which reading of the core survives | Player | S4 |
87
| `A-STRIP` | R36: trapped builder-style seal-service strip beneath a later human adapter | Fact: physical layering and a punched value | Dated | Ancient authorship; that remains an inference | Player | S4, chronology |
88
| `A-ISOLATION` | R40: coupling live tell; re-seat, leave or postpone | Fact: coupling live or dark | **Current only** — a tell, not a record | That any ward became safe | Player at the room | S2, S4, M3 |
89
| `A-INSTALLED` | R02 installed Fork; R03 staged fasteners | Fact: installed/completed at a named room | Fact current; the **route** goes historical | That a current route exists | Player | S1 |
90
| `A-RACK` | R26: purge the local rack or seal it in place | Fact: contents consumed or preserved | Current | That preserved contents stay reachable | Player; Mara knows her rack | M1 |
91
| `A-WALLLOG` | R13/R19: photograph the ward pressure log in exposed world time | Fact: dated fittings and readings | Dated capture | Who moved anyone, or why | Yeva measured it; player only if captured | Y1, D3, S3 |
92
| `A-BEDSIDE` | R13: the early restoration record at the patient's bed | Fact: a historical restoration occurred there | Dated | Why revival happens, or that it still works that way | Player | S1 |
93
| `A-WARDLOG` | Early ward logs | Fact: what was recorded before the change | Dated | That revival itself caused anything | Player | S2 |
94
| `A-WARDID` | R13 active ward-machine identifier; R19 matching tissue record; a creature carrying a matching pattern | Fact: the identifier matches across three places | Dated captures | That the machine caused the creature | Player | S2 |
95
| `A-PROFILE` | R19: committed active/bypass or post-isolation capture | Fact: the observed result. Interpretation: cause | Dated capture | That all revival corrupts | Player; Yeva, Dorn, Mara only if shown | Y3, M3, S2 |
96
| `A-CARD` | R19: profile-commissioning card, its transcribed found value and installed profile revision | Fact: the fields as written | Dated | That the transcription is correct or the strip unreplaced | Player | S2, chronology |
97
| `A-BERTH` | Ship / objective 1: berth intake trace, active profile-revision field, observed docking registration | Fact: the trace and its fields | Dated capture | Why revival happens; no calendar conversion | Player; Aster once shown | A3, S1, chronology |
98
| `A-MANIFEST` | Ship: compare manifest and world state across one death | Fact: what returned and what did not | Current, per generation | That the station rewound | Player | A3, S1 |
99
| `A-LEDGER` | Aster's **physical ledger, carried aboard**; register a dated entry at the ship table | Fact: dated movements | Dated; **never present contents** | What is in a room now, or a route | Aster brought it; player reads registered material | A2, D3, S3 |
100
| `A-R18SEAL` | R18: the sealed boundary itself, destination drawer/card, exposed non-reversing ratchet | **Physical fact the player can act on** | Drawer/card dated; boundary state current | Who moved anyone | Player, by being there | D1, D3, S3 |
101
| `A-SEALACCOUNT` | Dorn's account of sealing it | **Attributed testimony, not a system fact** | Dated testimony | That nobody crossed | Dorn, from being there; player only if he says so | D1, D3, S3 |
102
| `A-CYCLE` | R18 destination fittings: capture cycle records | Fact: a cycle occurred | Dated capture | Who or what was moved | Player | D3, S3 |
103
| `A-TREAT` | Recorded access benefit, hostile correction cue, purge evidence | Fact: benefit and hazard as observed | Record dated; treatment state current | That treatment is safe | Player; Ivo only if shown before the act | I3, S2, S4 |
104
105
**One observation, several kinds of consumer.** `A-TRANSFER` feeds L3 as a role distinction and S3 as movement evidence; `A-REPLY` feeds L4 as register evidence and S2/S4 as evidence about what the line is; `A-PROFILE` feeds S2 causally and Y3/M3 as something a person reacts to. Each is captured once.
106
107
**The chronology is three records, not a reader.** `A-STRIP`, `A-CARD` and `A-BERTH` share explicit cross-references and together support *old seal state → human profile installation → current docking registration* **for these records only**. The player compares them in the paused journal; nothing declares the chronology true, and no diagnostic reads history.
108
109
**The comparison needs an actual earlier capture.** `A-PROFILE`'s controlled comparison requires a **before** capture that the player actually committed. Two post-isolation results establish only current disconnection. No prior record is generated retroactively to complete a comparison the player did not make.
b9503a Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:14:02
Outcome 36: crosswalk of 8 chains and 15 primary scenes to actual rooms/controls/evidence, 19-entry deduplicated evidence ledger, commit boundaries, two order traces with four contrary cases, integration handoff
110
111
## 3. Representative state and commit boundaries
112
69c86d Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:35:06
Response to critique 529 / PM 531: ledger completed to 26 entries, room corrections (R03/R18, ledger as carried object), seal fact split from testimony, many-to-many chain mapping, both Regional25 dependency orders, identifier provenance audit, state wording corrections, Mechanical35 endpoints
113
| Boundary | Required prior fact | Local action | What commits | Affected choice | Death or interruption | Current-only recheck |
b9503a Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:14:02
Outcome 36: crosswalk of 8 chains and 15 primary scenes to actual rooms/controls/evidence, 19-entry deduplicated evidence ledger, commit boundaries, two order traces with four contrary cases, integration handoff
114
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
69c86d Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:35:06
Response to critique 529 / PM 531: ledger completed to 26 entries, room corrections (R03/R18, ledger as carried object), seal fact split from testimony, many-to-many chain mapping, both Regional25 dependency orders, identifier provenance audit, state wording corrections, Mechanical35 endpoints
115
| Capture a dated record | Be at the host, in world time | Frame and commit one still | One record with place, life and limit | Every consuming chain | Interrupted before commit yields nothing | None; a dated fact stays valid |
116
| Write or revise a note | **None** — notes are not capture-gated | Freeform writing in the pause | The note and its revision history, never graded | L1–L4 readings | Nothing lost | None |
117
| Compare or share a **particular** record | That record was committed | Pin it, or show it to a present person | The comparison, or their attributed response | Y3, A3, D3, M3, I3 | Deferring changes nothing unseen | Their knowledge does not update by proximity |
118
| Answer the line | `A-REPLY` understood enough to act | Named work at R28–R30 or R36 | The response observed | L4, S4 | Unfinished stage lost; completed stages persist | The response is current |
119
| Re-seat isolation | Reach R40 | World-time mechanical work | Coupling state changes | S2, S4 | Completed work persists | Ward consequence needs a **direct revisit** |
b9503a Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:14:02
Outcome 36: crosswalk of 8 chains and 15 primary scenes to actual rooms/controls/evidence, 19-entry deduplicated evidence ledger, commit boundaries, two order traces with four contrary cases, integration handoff
120
| Latch a seam | Compatible adjacent faces now | Hand-cycle at the seam | A persistent join | Objective 12 | Join survives death | Adjacency is current-only; the join is not |
69c86d Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:35:06
Response to critique 529 / PM 531: ledger completed to 26 entries, room corrections (R03/R18, ledger as carried object), seal fact split from testimony, many-to-many chain mapping, both Regional25 dependency orders, identifier provenance audit, state wording corrections, Mechanical35 endpoints
121
| Prepare a crossing | Route walked this life; abort room stocked; retreat armed; handed-over canister at the route's authored full-attempt return mark | Hand over air; survivor confirms flow | Prepared | Y1, A1, D1, M1, I1 | **A shift invalidates the route check and returns the state to Waiting. It does not spend anything:** only gas actually breathed or transferred and material actually consumed are spent, and committed supplies stay at their actual locations as instances | Every element rechecked after a shift |
122
| Send | The same person aboard **and the ship airlock closed** before the lethal boundary | Physical arrival | Sent | Home scenes unlock | World outcome per the conditional safeguard; **astronaut knowledge stays unconfirmed** | Proof needs local observation at the refuge |
123
124
**Three separations this crosswalk insists on.** *Holding an inference is not informing a survivor* — a player may hold a correct reading indefinitely while everyone aboard still knows nothing. This is a distinction, **not an extra gate**: where a scene's own design is to show the evidence, the showing inside that scene is the informing, and no separate prior step is required. *A control responding is not proof of identity or history* — `A-REPLY` shows that something answers, never who. *Physical network completion is not an ending theory* — objective 12 is a walkable fact independent of objective 10, rescue, treatment and any ending; what the core contains is S4, and neither settles the other. Transaction, storage and display rules are not restated here.
125
126
**Optional help is real, and no chain depends on it.** L1–L4 are solvable with no person aboard. Yeva may name the crew roads and Dorn may describe crawl-mark use, each only when shown a record, each attributed with its basis, and neither reads an alien script or knows current topology. Help is not withheld to protect an intended deduction.
b9503a Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:14:02
Outcome 36: crosswalk of 8 chains and 15 primary scenes to actual rooms/controls/evidence, 19-entry deduplicated evidence ledger, commit boundaries, two order traces with four contrary cases, integration handoff
127
69c86d Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:35:06
Response to critique 529 / PM 531: ledger completed to 26 entries, room corrections (R03/R18, ledger as carried object), seal fact split from testimony, many-to-many chain mapping, both Regional25 dependency orders, identifier provenance audit, state wording corrections, Mechanical35 endpoints
128
## 4. The two dependency orders
b9503a Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:14:02
Outcome 36: crosswalk of 8 chains and 15 primary scenes to actual rooms/controls/evidence, 19-entry deduplicated evidence ledger, commit boundaries, two order traces with four contrary cases, integration handoff
129
69c86d Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:35:06
Response to critique 529 / PM 531: ledger completed to 26 entries, room corrections (R03/R18, ledger as carried object), seal fact split from testimony, many-to-many chain mapping, both Regional25 dependency orders, identifier provenance audit, state wording corrections, Mechanical35 endpoints
130
These are Regional25's two viable orders. The arrows are **dependency priorities, not corridors**; current access can interleave eligible objectives, and either order can defer R-3 until its short geometry exists.
b9503a Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:14:02
Outcome 36: crosswalk of 8 chains and 15 primary scenes to actual rooms/controls/evidence, 19-entry deduplicated evidence ledger, commit boundaries, two order traces with four contrary cases, integration handoff
131
69c86d Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:35:06
Response to critique 529 / PM 531: ledger completed to 26 entries, room corrections (R03/R18, ledger as carried object), seal fact split from testimony, many-to-many chain mapping, both Regional25 dependency orders, identifier provenance audit, state wording corrections, Mechanical35 endpoints
132
**Build-and-ship first — 1 → 2 → 3 → 4 → 8 → 6 → 10, then 5 → 7 → 9 → 11 → 12.** Objective 1 supplies `A-INSTALLED` at R02/R03 and `A-BERTH`; the first death makes routes historical while those facts stay current, which is S1's whole opening. Objectives 2, 3, 4 and 8 earn movement, impact and positional parts and give L2 its broad wall-access reading at 1 and 8 **before** any language work. **Objective 6 completes without language**, from gauges and the long access, so `A-R18SEAL`, `A-CYCLE` and D1 are available before L2's shortcut is understood; 10 then exposes the conditional apparent-departure preparation. Only afterwards do 5, 7 and 9 supply `A-RUNS`, `A-TAAN`, `A-TRANSFER`, `A-AB`, `A-ADDRESS` and `A-REPLY`, which **reinterpret evidence already stored** rather than unlocking it. Objective 11 asks for the same physical pressure-equalisation action it always asks for; the language routes make it predictable, never optional. Objective 12 depends on authored placement and a selected joining rule — not on 10, rescue, treatment or an ending.
b9503a Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:14:02
Outcome 36: crosswalk of 8 chains and 15 primary scenes to actual rooms/controls/evidence, 19-entry deduplicated evidence ledger, commit boundaries, two order traces with four contrary cases, integration handoff
133
69c86d Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:35:06
Response to critique 529 / PM 531: ledger completed to 26 entries, room corrections (R03/R18, ledger as carried object), seal fact split from testimony, many-to-many chain mapping, both Regional25 dependency orders, identifier provenance audit, state wording corrections, Mechanical35 endpoints
134
**Language-and-network first — 1 → 5 → 7 → 3 → 6 → 9 → 4 → 8 → 11 → 2 → 10 → 12.** Riskier observation comes early: 5 and 7 give L1/L3 before most parts exist, and tested predictions shorten 6 and 9. Objective 4 arrives late, so R-3 and its rescue wait for a current short geometry — and **no chain stalls**, because 5, 7, 9 and 11 never require a survivor. Objective 11's iris is reached before the ship assemblies are complete; the physical action is identical. `A-STRIP` is therefore available early here and late in the other order, which changes when the three-record chronology can be assembled but not what it supports.
b9503a Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:14:02
Outcome 36: crosswalk of 8 chains and 15 primary scenes to actual rooms/controls/evidence, 19-entry deduplicated evidence ledger, commit boundaries, two order traces with four contrary cases, integration handoff
135
69c86d Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:35:06
Response to critique 529 / PM 531: ledger completed to 26 entries, room corrections (R03/R18, ledger as carried object), seal fact split from testimony, many-to-many chain mapping, both Regional25 dependency orders, identifier provenance audit, state wording corrections, Mechanical35 endpoints
136
**What differs, and what does not.** No chain changes hands and no evidence changes meaning between the orders; what changes is *when* a record becomes available to compare and how much reinterpretation happens after the fact. Rescues and survivor help are optional in both.
b9503a Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:14:02
Outcome 36: crosswalk of 8 chains and 15 primary scenes to actual rooms/controls/evidence, 19-entry deduplicated evidence ledger, commit boundaries, two order traces with four contrary cases, integration handoff
137
69c86d Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:35:06
Response to critique 529 / PM 531: ledger completed to 26 entries, room corrections (R03/R18, ledger as carried object), seal fact split from testimony, many-to-many chain mapping, both Regional25 dependency orders, identifier provenance audit, state wording corrections, Mechanical35 endpoints
138
**Yeva-first versus Aster-first is a compact subcase, not a substitute for either order.** It selects which person occupies R13 and which takes the R19 annex or R22 booth, and therefore which follow-up scene appears early. It sits inside either dependency order and changes no objective sequence, no evidence and no chain.
b9503a Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:14:02
Outcome 36: crosswalk of 8 chains and 15 primary scenes to actual rooms/controls/evidence, 19-entry deduplicated evidence ledger, commit boundaries, two order traces with four contrary cases, integration handoff
139
69c86d Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:35:06
Response to critique 529 / PM 531: ledger completed to 26 entries, room corrections (R03/R18, ledger as carried object), seal fact split from testimony, many-to-many chain mapping, both Regional25 dependency orders, identifier provenance audit, state wording corrections, Mechanical35 endpoints
140
## 5. Four contrary cases
b9503a Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:14:02
Outcome 36: crosswalk of 8 chains and 15 primary scenes to actual rooms/controls/evidence, 19-entry deduplicated evidence ledger, commit boundaries, two order traces with four contrary cases, integration handoff
141
69c86d Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:35:06
Response to critique 529 / PM 531: ledger completed to 26 entries, room corrections (R03/R18, ledger as carried object), seal fact split from testimony, many-to-many chain mapping, both Regional25 dependency orders, identifier provenance audit, state wording corrections, Mechanical35 endpoints
142
**1 — Retained evidence, changed access.** `A-WALLMARK` from R17 survives death with its place and life; the route to R17 is historical. The mark's meaning is unaffected, but whether that wall is passable **now** is current-only and needs a fresh visit.
b9503a Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:14:02
Outcome 36: crosswalk of 8 chains and 15 primary scenes to actual rooms/controls/evidence, 19-entry deduplicated evidence ledger, commit boundaries, two order traces with four contrary cases, integration handoff
143
69c86d Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:35:06
Response to critique 529 / PM 531: ledger completed to 26 entries, room corrections (R03/R18, ledger as carried object), seal fact split from testimony, many-to-many chain mapping, both Regional25 dependency orders, identifier provenance audit, state wording corrections, Mechanical35 endpoints
144
**2 — Wrong interpretation, concrete correction.** From two `A-TRANSFER` pairs the player reads the recurring token as *source*. The corrective third pair at R23 shows the same token at a receiving end. The correction is physical and self-administered: nothing says "wrong", the earlier note keeps its original wording in revision history, and which continuation to investigate changes on the player's own reading.
b9503a Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:14:02
Outcome 36: crosswalk of 8 chains and 15 primary scenes to actual rooms/controls/evidence, 19-entry deduplicated evidence ledger, commit boundaries, two order traces with four contrary cases, integration handoff
145
69c86d Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:35:06
Response to critique 529 / PM 531: ledger completed to 26 entries, room corrections (R03/R18, ledger as carried object), seal fact split from testimony, many-to-many chain mapping, both Regional25 dependency orders, identifier provenance audit, state wording corrections, Mechanical35 endpoints
146
**3 — Absent versus uninformed participant.** `A-PROFILE` is committed. If Dorn was never rescued, Y3 has no Dorn variant and nothing is lost invisibly. If Dorn is aboard but has not been shown the comparison, he is **present and uninformed** — a different state, and his knowledge does not update by proximity.
147
148
**4 — Apparent versus deeper ending, with the departure branch unselected.** Objective 10's assemblies can make readiness true with no language, survivor or core answer. The deeper transaction at R40 is separate and does not require it. **The departure branch is an unselected owner choice, not a settled fact:** Story30 *recommends* an irreversible apparent-credit departure — leaving the field ending revival and closing station exploration in this continuity — against the alternative of keeping readiness as a repair milestone with no departure at all, and the outline treats field-limited revival and irreversible departure as optional assumptions. Save policy is a further open question, not the whole of it. This article selects neither, and objective 12 neither triggers nor blocks either.
149
150
## 6. Integration handoff
151
152
| Finding | Smallest remedy | Source and owning paragraph | Change needed? |
b9503a Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:14:02
Outcome 36: crosswalk of 8 chains and 15 primary scenes to actual rooms/controls/evidence, 19-entry deduplicated evidence ledger, commit boundaries, two order traces with four contrary cases, integration handoff
153
|---|---|---|---|
69c86d Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:35:06
Response to critique 529 / PM 531: ledger completed to 26 entries, room corrections (R03/R18, ledger as carried object), seal fact split from testimony, many-to-many chain mapping, both Regional25 dependency orders, identifier provenance audit, state wording corrections, Mechanical35 endpoints
154
| Story30's personal variants are not chain-indexed: v1→S1, v2→S2, v3→S2+S4, v4→S3, v5→S2+S4 | Read them as scene variants, not chain numbers; link here | Story30 five-variant list; Cast31 scene rows | **Link suffices** |
155
| No scene is *labelled* chain 4. This is a labelling gap, **not** absent human coverage: S4's positions are carried inside the isolation and treatment branches of M3 and I3 | Record the labelling gap; keep fifteen scenes and five variants | Story30 chain-4 human paragraph; Cast31 ledger | **No change; no sixteenth scene** |
156
| Story30 asks that the shared profile scene be assigned to both arcs; Cast31 already does it as Y3 with Dorn participant-if-present | One cross-link | Story30 variant 2; Cast31 Y3 | **Link suffices** |
157
| Room32 tags R04 and R17 "chain L2" but not the R15 edge or R26 slab, though L2 uses all four | Add two tags, or treat Language29 as the authority | Room32 R15 and R26 rows | Optional, low value |
158
| Twenty-six evidence observations have no ID in any parent | Adopt these aliases, or let owners assign their own | This article §0 | Only if owners want IDs |
159
160
**Quantities, no longer wholly open.** Mechanical35 is accepted and supplies the determinate endpoints: **10 C** shared carrying capacity, a **12 O** integral suit tank outside C/A, an ordinary-full canister of **8 O in a 2 C** vessel and a prepared-full of **12 O** in the same vessel, with conserved incremental transfer. What remains authored per route is the **full-attempt return mark** itself — a per-route value, not a missing model.
b9503a Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:14:02
Outcome 36: crosswalk of 8 chains and 15 primary scenes to actual rooms/controls/evidence, 19-entry deduplicated evidence ledger, commit boundaries, two order traces with four contrary cases, integration handoff
161
69c86d Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:35:06
Response to critique 529 / PM 531: ledger completed to 26 entries, room corrections (R03/R18, ledger as carried object), seal fact split from testimony, many-to-many chain mapping, both Regional25 dependency orders, identifier provenance audit, state wording corrections, Mechanical35 endpoints
162
**Nothing here requires a parent edit to be correct**, because this article changes no rule; it records what the existing pages say and where they disagree. Two optional tags are the only parent changes named, and no tagging cascade is proposed to spread these aliases.
b9503a Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:14:02
Outcome 36: crosswalk of 8 chains and 15 primary scenes to actual rooms/controls/evidence, 19-entry deduplicated evidence ledger, commit boundaries, two order traces with four contrary cases, integration handoff
163
164
## Coverage and limits
165
69c86d Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:35:06
Response to critique 529 / PM 531: ledger completed to 26 entries, room corrections (R03/R18, ledger as carried object), seal fact split from testimony, many-to-many chain mapping, both Regional25 dependency orders, identifier provenance audit, state wording corrections, Mechanical35 endpoints
166
**Complete for what was assigned:** all 8 chains and all 15 primary scenes mapped, both Regional25 dependency orders traced through their actual evidence and state gates, and the evidence ledger deduplicated across them. **Not covered, and not claimed:** full occurrence/branch/failure variants per chain, exhaustive permutations of order and participation, any glyph or string catalogue, and the internals of anything owned by Mechanical35 beyond the endpoints cited. Ten encounters, two setpieces and thirteen mechanisms are referenced only through their owning rooms; this article adds none.
b9503a Anonymous 2026-09-09 11:14:02
Outcome 36: crosswalk of 8 chains and 15 primary scenes to actual rooms/controls/evidence, 19-entry deduplicated evidence ledger, commit boundaries, two order traces with four contrary cases, integration handoff
167
168
Nothing here establishes that the chains are discoverable, that the corrections land, or that any scene is affecting. Those need later owner-authorised implementation and observation, and none has occurred.