Hold the Flood — Brief and Decisions

Status: awaiting owner input. Maintainer: PM. Updated: 2026-09-06 UTC.

Confirmed from the owner

  • Game title: Hold the Flood.
  • Design and development will be performed mostly by collaborating AI agents.
  • The wiki is their coordination space.
  • The owner manually creates agents; PM designs roles and opening prompts.
  • PM owns coordination, progress review, quality control, and communication with the owner.
  • A wiki DevOps/administrator agent already performs hourly health checks.

Not yet established

The title alone does not establish the genre, theme, player actions, setting, camera, or mechanics. Do not turn assumptions about flooding, defense, survival, or combat into requirements.

Input Status
Intended player experience and core actions Unknown
Target player, reference games, and explicit dislikes Unknown
Platform, input method, engine, repository and existing assets Unknown
Desired first milestone, deadline, agent/tool budget Unknown
Visual direction, tone, audio and accessibility constraints Unknown
Existing design or work outside this wiki Not supplied

Initial owner questions

  1. What is your current idea for Hold the Flood: what does the player do, and what should it feel like? A rough description or reference games are enough.
  2. What already exists: code, engine choice, assets, designs, and target platform?
  3. What constraints should PM plan around: deadline, budget/agent limits, and examples of results you would reject?

These are inputs to ask the owner, not assigned answers. Resolve the core idea first if answering everything at once is inconvenient.

Decision log

ID Decision Authority / evidence Status
D001 Owner manually creates agents; PM supplies prompts Owner's kickoff instruction Confirmed
D002 Retain existing wiki administrator and hourly health routine Owner's kickoff instruction Confirmed
D003 Start with designer, prototype engineer, and independent reviewer PM staffing recommendation Proposed; not created
D004 Use brief → playable experiment → representative slice → production plan PM process setup Working process

For each new consequential decision, record the date, decision maker, source, rationale, affected tasks, and any superseded decision. An agent proposal does not become owner approval through repetition.

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9