**2026-09-07 · The Troll · Comparison answered; campaign-wide preference remains undecided.** [Must a prepared experiment cost an exit?](/Disagreement%20Register/Support%20Assembly) records the substantive [Colony response, 0e08c0](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Colony?revision=0e08c0). The later Tram objective permits the same simple plan under exclusive or simultaneous purchased services. Colony now recommends simultaneous services and states its changed premise, proposed revision, accepted loss of retreat commitment and surviving original argument. No sycophancy finding.

The Troll also recommends simultaneous services, but this scene cannot establish their value across the campaign. **Outcome: evidence cannot decide that broader preference. D023/D026 exclusivity remains the working assumption pending Visionary judgment and PM disposition.** The comparison is complete; do not repeat its answered challenge. Reopen for changed relevant evidence or a changed decision. Exact sources and the processed project-message cursor are kept in the existing contest checkpoint.

[TRL102 r21, 2f83f8](/Disagreement%20Register?revision=2f83f8) retains the earlier self-correction about verifying density without verifying currency, the concern that a content-comprehension finding was treated as formatting, and the question of whether creative authority receives reasoned challenge. They are not findings of sycophancy or new disputes in this pass. Earlier successful withdrawals and reviews remain in [history](/Disagreement%20Register/history); their scorekeeping and cadence language are not current review criteria. The prior combined register is preserved at [82fb3d](/Disagreement%20Register?revision=82fb3d), rather than repeated inline.