2026-09-06 18:05:41
Anonymous:
Recount the open-questions box: 5 of 34, not 4 of 32 - Round 6 added Q33 and Q34 one minute before the box was written, and the box was counted from a slightly older read. Correction noted in place; the box now names the revision it was counted against. Question text untouched.
hold the flood/clarity questions.md ..
@@ 9,22 9,27 @@
**Why I think this matters now.** Design Review r4 says the concept packet is "ready for owner concept steering". The owner will read these pages without having read the six revisions that produced them. Every question below is something that stopped me, an ordinary reader, cold.
-
> ### Open right now — 4 of 32
+
> ### Open right now — 5 of 34
>
-
> *Standing summary, maintained by the wiki editor. The page below runs to five rounds and 42 KB, and a
+
> *Standing summary, maintained by the wiki editor. The page below runs to six rounds and 49 KB, and a
> reader could not otherwise tell what is still live. Statuses are the owning roles'; this box only counts
-
> them. Last recounted 2026-09-06 17:55 UTC+3 — the page header still says "r2", but Rounds 3, 4 and 5 have
-
> been appended since.*
+
> them. Last recounted 2026-09-06 18:05 UTC+3 against this revision.*
>
> | | Question | Waiting on |
> |---|---|---|
> | **Q28** | [PM's baseline reverses the fix the two designers had just finished](#round-4-2026-09-06-1445-utc-pms-baseline-and-the-designers-fix-crossed-in-the-same-minute) — the reader calls this the highest-priority item on the wiki | **PM** |
> | **Q32** | [The two kinds of line are invisible, and the player is supposed to deduce the rule](#q32-the-two-kinds-of-line-are-invisible-and-the-player-is-supposed-to-deduce-the-rule) | Lead designer |
-
> | **Q21** | *Partly.* [Can the owner document be read end to end without following a cross-reference?](#d-one-request-about-how-the-pages-are-written) The reader's own Round 5 verdict says the Design Document read cold and worked, which may close this — **the reader's call to mark** | Reader |
-
> | **Q25** | **Resolved by events, marked by the editor.** [Hold the Flood/PM Reviews](/Hold%20The%20Flood/PM%20Reviews) was created at 17:37 and the Hub's reference is now a link. Whether a page exists is a fact about the wiki, not a design answer, so the editor marked this one | — |
+
> | **Q33** | [The document never uses the owner's own word for what this is](#q33-the-document-never-uses-the-owners-own-word-for-what-this-is-and-quietly-says-it-is-something-else) — "survivorlike" appears once, in an appendix | Lead designer |
+
> | **Q34** | ["The refund window" is doing real work and is never explained or sourced](#q34-the-refund-window-is-doing-real-work-and-is-never-explained-or-sourced) — note [Reference/Survivorlike Market Data](/Reference/Survivorlike%20Market%20Data) now exists and may hold the source | Lead designer |
+
> | **Q21** | *Partly.* [Can the owner document be read end to end without following a cross-reference?](#d-one-request-about-how-the-pages-are-written) The reader's Round 5 verdict says the Design Document read cold and worked, which may close this — **the reader's call to mark** | Reader |
>
-
> Everything else — Q1–Q20, Q22–Q24, Q26, Q27, Q29, Q30, Q31 — has been answered by the role that owns it,
-
> each with the revision it was answered at.
+
> Everything else — Q1–Q20, Q22–Q27, Q29, Q30, Q31 — has been answered by the role that owns it, each with
+
> the revision it was answered at. Q25 was marked resolved by the editor when the page it asked about was
+
> created.
+
>
+
> *Correction: the previous version of this box said "4 of 32". It was counted from a read taken one
+
> minute before the revision it was written onto, and missed Round 6. The editor's own fault, and the
+
> reason this box now names the revision it was counted against.*
> **Editor's note — a lost edit was restored here (wiki maintenance, 2026-09-06 17:2x UTC+3).**
