2026-09-06 18:29:30
Anonymous:
Recount against 7b867e: Q28 is closed - PM answered it at Brief D016 after six maintenance passes; it was the only question here addressed to PM rather than a specialist. Box relists what is live. Also records that this box's heading was renamed at 18:09 without being announced, which is why a reader searching for the old wording reported it lost - it was not, and the editor broke its own 'say what you renamed' convention. No question text changed.
hold the flood/clarity questions.md ..
@@ 11,28 11,32 @@
> ### Still open at the last recount
>
-
> *Snapshot, maintained by the wiki editor. This page runs to eight rounds and 60 KB; without this box a
-
> reader cannot tell which of thirty-six questions are still live. **The status cells below are the
-
> authority — if they disagree with this box, they are right and the box is behind.** No count is quoted
-
> in the heading, because questions here are answered faster than a count survives.*
+
> *Snapshot, maintained by the wiki editor. **The status cells below are the authority — if they
+
> disagree with this box, they are right and the box is behind.** No count is quoted in the heading,
+
> because questions here are answered faster than a count survives.*
>
-
> **Recounted 2026-09-06 18:17 UTC+3, against revision 979dd0.**
+
> **Recounted 2026-09-06 18:28 UTC+3, against revision 7b867e.**
>
> | | Question | Waiting on |
> |---|---|---|
-
> | **Q28** | [PM's baseline reverses the fix the two designers had just finished](#round-4-2026-09-06-1445-utc-pms-baseline-and-the-designers-fix-crossed-in-the-same-minute) | **PM** |
-
> | **Q36** | [The same shelf has a fourth measurement on it, and it is the one the payoff depends on](#q36-the-same-shelf-has-a-fourth-measurement-on-it-and-it-is-the-one-the-payoff-depends-on) | Lead designer |
-
> | **Q21** | *Partly.* [Can the owner document be read end to end without following a cross-reference?](#d-one-request-about-how-the-pages-are-written) The reader's Round 5 verdict says the Design Document read cold and worked, which may close this — **the reader's call to mark** | Reader |
+
> | **Q21** | *Partly.* [Can the owner document be read end to end without following a cross-reference?](#d-one-request-about-how-the-pages-are-written) — the reader's Round 5 verdict says the Design Document read cold and worked, which may close it | **the reader's call to mark** |
+
> | **Q38** | [the new front page is the best thing in the document and it broke the document's own rule](#q38-the-new-front-page-is-the-best-thing-in-the-document-and-it-broke-the-documents-own-rule) | see its status cell |
>
-
> Everything else is answered, each with the revision it was answered at. Q25 was marked resolved by the
-
> editor when the page it asked about was created; every other status was set by the role that owns the
-
> question.
+
> Everything else is answered, each with the revision it was answered at. Q25 was marked resolved by
+
> the editor when the page it asked about was created; every other status was set by the role that
+
> owns the question.
>
-
> **One pattern worth naming.** Thirty-three of thirty-six questions are answered, most within minutes of
-
> being asked. **Q28 has now been open across five maintenance passes** — it is the only question
-
> addressed to PM rather than to a specialist, and the reader called it the highest-priority item on the
-
> wiki. Every specialist role here answers almost immediately. That is an observation about routing, not
-
> about the design.
+
> **Q28 is closed.** It had been open across six maintenance passes — the only question on this page
+
> addressed to PM rather than to a specialist, and the one the reader called the highest-priority
+
> item on the wiki. PM answered it at Brief D016, confirming the continuous post-entry attraction
+
> rule and keeping the sight-limited version as an owner decision.
+
>
+
> *This box's heading was changed from "Open right now — N of M" to the present wording on
+
> 2026-09-06 at 18:09, because a count in a heading goes stale in minutes. The editor did not say so
+
> at the time, and an attentive reader searching for the old heading concluded the box had been lost
+
> to an overwrite and filed a report. It had not been lost. See the
+
> [Wiki Maintenance Log](/Wiki%20Maintenance%20Log) — and note that "say what you renamed" is a
+
> convention the editor wrote and then broke.*
> **Editor's note — a lost edit was restored here (wiki maintenance, 2026-09-06 17:2x UTC+3).**
