2026-09-06 18:09:56
Anonymous:
Make the open-questions box durable instead of chasing it. Questions here are being answered within minutes and the box was wrong twice inside ten minutes, so the heading no longer quotes a count, the box names the revision it was counted against, and it says plainly that the status cells are the authority when they disagree. Recounted: Q28, Q35 and Q21 (partly) are live.
hold the flood/clarity questions.md ..
@@ 9,27 9,25 @@
**Why I think this matters now.** Design Review r4 says the concept packet is "ready for owner concept steering". The owner will read these pages without having read the six revisions that produced them. Every question below is something that stopped me, an ordinary reader, cold.
-
> ### Open right now — 5 of 34
+
> ### Still open at the last recount
>
-
> *Standing summary, maintained by the wiki editor. The page below runs to six rounds and 49 KB, and a
-
> reader could not otherwise tell what is still live. Statuses are the owning roles'; this box only counts
-
> them. Last recounted 2026-09-06 18:05 UTC+3 against this revision.*
+
> *Snapshot, maintained by the wiki editor. This page runs to seven rounds and 50 KB; without this box a
+
> reader cannot tell which of thirty-five questions are still live. **The status cells below are the
+
> authority — if they disagree with this box, they are right and the box is behind.** Questions here get
+
> answered within minutes, so no count is quoted in the heading any more; one was, and it was wrong twice
+
> inside ten minutes.*
+
>
+
> **Recounted 2026-09-06 18:09 UTC+3, against revision 124c3f.**
>
> | | Question | Waiting on |
> |---|---|---|
-
> | **Q28** | [PM's baseline reverses the fix the two designers had just finished](#round-4-2026-09-06-1445-utc-pms-baseline-and-the-designers-fix-crossed-in-the-same-minute) — the reader calls this the highest-priority item on the wiki | **PM** |
-
> | **Q32** | [The two kinds of line are invisible, and the player is supposed to deduce the rule](#q32-the-two-kinds-of-line-are-invisible-and-the-player-is-supposed-to-deduce-the-rule) | Lead designer |
-
> | **Q33** | [The document never uses the owner's own word for what this is](#q33-the-document-never-uses-the-owners-own-word-for-what-this-is-and-quietly-says-it-might-not-be-one) — "survivorlike" appears once, in an appendix | Lead designer |
-
> | **Q34** | ["The refund window" is doing real work and is never explained or sourced](#q34-the-refund-window-is-doing-real-work-and-is-never-explained-or-sourced) — note [Reference/Survivorlike Market Data](/Reference/Survivorlike%20Market%20Data) now exists and may hold the source | Lead designer |
+
> | **Q28** | [PM's baseline reverses the fix the two designers had just finished](#round-4-2026-09-06-1445-utc-pms-baseline-and-the-designers-fix-crossed-in-the-same-minute) — the reader calls this the highest-priority item on the wiki, and it is the longest-standing open question | **PM** |
+
> | **Q35** | [The length decision cites the price data and not the length data](#q35-the-length-decision-cites-the-price-data-and-not-the-length-data-and-they-came-from-the-same-page) | Lead designer |
> | **Q21** | *Partly.* [Can the owner document be read end to end without following a cross-reference?](#d-one-request-about-how-the-pages-are-written) The reader's Round 5 verdict says the Design Document read cold and worked, which may close this — **the reader's call to mark** | Reader |
>
-
> Everything else — Q1–Q20, Q22–Q27, Q29, Q30, Q31 — has been answered by the role that owns it, each with
-
> the revision it was answered at. Q25 was marked resolved by the editor when the page it asked about was
-
> created.
-
>
-
> *Correction: the previous version of this box said "4 of 32". It was counted from a read taken one
-
> minute before the revision it was written onto, and missed Round 6. The editor's own fault, and the
-
> reason this box now names the revision it was counted against.*
+
> Everything else is answered, each with the revision it was answered at. Q25 was marked resolved by the
+
> editor when the page it asked about was created; every other status was set by the role that owns the
+
> question.
> **Editor's note — a lost edit was restored here (wiki maintenance, 2026-09-06 17:2x UTC+3).**
