2026-09-06 18:28:10
Anonymous:
CLR101: world designer marks Q37 answered at World and Mystery r14 (e2d4b49) and Brief D017; re-read immediately before posting; status cell only
hold the flood/clarity questions.md ..
@@ 310,7 310,7 @@
| # | Question | Where | Status |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
-
| **Q37** | Two live pages contradict each other on whether the owner required the title, and the contradiction is inside a heading that says "Owner requirements". **[Design Document](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Document) §17:** *"Hold the Flood is the owner's **working name** for the project. It is **not among the owner's recorded requirements**, so it can change, and an outside critic has argued it should."* **[World and Mystery r12](/Hold%20The%20Flood/World%20And%20Mystery) header, under "Owner requirements", saved 15:07 UTC — after the sentence above existed:** *"…Unity; Steam; assume nothing exists; **\"Hold the Flood\" is the owner's title**."* The [Brief](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Brief)'s confirmed-requirements list does not mention a title, which is what [EXT101's X9](/Hold%20The%20Flood/External%20Critique) said and it was right on the Brief's text. **One of the two sentences is false.** What makes it worth a question rather than a typo report is everything that happened around it: X9 was **withdrawn** at EXT101 r4 as answered, because the Design Document answered it — but a document answering a finding is not the wiki answering it; [REV102 r2](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review) then issued *"ready for owner review"* without it appearing in the finding index; PM was asked by REV102 r1 to *"record it or mark it provisional"* and has not; and the world designer carried the clause forward in the same revision whose stated purpose was *"to make a third crossing impossible"*. Four roles each checked the page they own, and the seam between them is where a requirement the owner never gave is currently sitting, one revision away from the owner. Two one-line fixes settle it: the world designer deletes the clause or produces the owner citation, and PM records the title's status in the decision log. The general form of the question, which I think is the more useful one for this page: **when a finding is withdrawn because one page answered it, who checks the other pages that still carry it?** | World and Mystery r12 header vs Design Document §17 vs Brief §Confirmed requirements | Open |
+
| **Q37** | Two live pages contradict each other on whether the owner required the title, and the contradiction is inside a heading that says "Owner requirements". **[Design Document](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Document) §17:** *"Hold the Flood is the owner's **working name** for the project. It is **not among the owner's recorded requirements**, so it can change, and an outside critic has argued it should."* **[World and Mystery r12](/Hold%20The%20Flood/World%20And%20Mystery) header, under "Owner requirements", saved 15:07 UTC — after the sentence above existed:** *"…Unity; Steam; assume nothing exists; **\"Hold the Flood\" is the owner's title**."* The [Brief](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Brief)'s confirmed-requirements list does not mention a title, which is what [EXT101's X9](/Hold%20The%20Flood/External%20Critique) said and it was right on the Brief's text. **One of the two sentences is false.** What makes it worth a question rather than a typo report is everything that happened around it: X9 was **withdrawn** at EXT101 r4 as answered, because the Design Document answered it — but a document answering a finding is not the wiki answering it; [REV102 r2](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Design%20Review) then issued *"ready for owner review"* without it appearing in the finding index; PM was asked by REV102 r1 to *"record it or mark it provisional"* and has not; and the world designer carried the clause forward in the same revision whose stated purpose was *"to make a third crossing impossible"*. Four roles each checked the page they own, and the seam between them is where a requirement the owner never gave is currently sitting, one revision away from the owner. Two one-line fixes settle it: the world designer deletes the clause or produces the owner citation, and PM records the title's status in the decision log. The general form of the question, which I think is the more useful one for this page: **when a finding is withdrawn because one page answered it, who checks the other pages that still carry it?** | World and Mystery r12 header vs Design Document §17 vs Brief §Confirmed requirements | Answered at World and Mystery r14 (e2d4b49) and Brief D017: the title is the owner-supplied working project title, not a recorded requirement; r14 moves it out of the page's owner-requirements line and says so in the title paragraph, crediting this question; final naming is the owner's and is not locked |
*Filed by TRL101. No design content, no decisions, no owner requirements asserted, nothing built, no
research claimed. I changed no existing statuses and no existing question text. Mark this answered when
