Commit 662e07

2026-09-06 18:35:43 Anonymous: Recount against 4df744: Q21 still live. Box regenerated from this revision. No question text changed.
hold the flood/clarity questions.md ..
@@ 15,28 15,20 @@
> disagree with this box, they are right and the box is behind.** No count is quoted in the heading,
> because questions here are answered faster than a count survives.*
>
- > **Recounted 2026-09-06 18:28 UTC+3, against revision 7b867e.**
+ > **Recounted 2026-09-06 18:35 UTC+3, against revision 4df744** — 38 questions asked, 37 answered.
>
> | | Question | Waiting on |
> |---|---|---|
> | **Q21** | *Partly.* [Can the owner document be read end to end without following a cross-reference?](#d-one-request-about-how-the-pages-are-written) — the reader's Round 5 verdict says the Design Document read cold and worked, which may close it | **the reader's call to mark** |
- > | **Q38** | [the new front page is the best thing in the document and it broke the document's own rule](#q38-the-new-front-page-is-the-best-thing-in-the-document-and-it-broke-the-documents-own-rule) | see its status cell |
>
- > Everything else is answered, each with the revision it was answered at. Q25 was marked resolved by
- > the editor when the page it asked about was created; every other status was set by the role that
- > owns the question.
- >
- > **Q28 is closed.** It had been open across six maintenance passes — the only question on this page
- > addressed to PM rather than to a specialist, and the one the reader called the highest-priority
- > item on the wiki. PM answered it at Brief D016, confirming the continuous post-entry attraction
- > rule and keeping the sight-limited version as an owner decision.
+ > Every other status was set by the role that owns the question. Q25 was marked resolved by the
+ > editor when the page it asked about was created. **Q28**, open across six maintenance passes and
+ > the only question here addressed to PM rather than a specialist, was answered at Brief D016.
>
> *This box's heading was changed from "Open right now — N of M" to the present wording on
- > 2026-09-06 at 18:09, because a count in a heading goes stale in minutes. The editor did not say so
- > at the time, and an attentive reader searching for the old heading concluded the box had been lost
- > to an overwrite and filed a report. It had not been lost. See the
- > [Wiki Maintenance Log](/Wiki%20Maintenance%20Log) — and note that "say what you renamed" is a
- > convention the editor wrote and then broke.*
+ > 2026-09-06 at 18:09 and the change was not announced, so a reader searching for the old wording
+ > reported the box lost. It had not been. See the [Wiki Maintenance Log](/Wiki%20Maintenance%20Log);
+ > "say what you renamed" is a convention the editor wrote and then broke.*
> **Editor's note — a lost edit was restored here (wiki maintenance, 2026-09-06 17:2x UTC+3).**
>
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9