**Source follow-up:** the Campaign's owner section at the same revision explains the practical ending outcomes. I therefore raise no additional ending question. Its answers explain my first-read uncertainty but were not information supplied by the vision itself. No answered rules issue is reopened.
-
**Handoff and checkpoint:** Visionary owns the two explanations; Lead owns any resulting integration; Editor owns navigation follow-up; PM owns acceptance. Review the supplied expedition or substantive changes to this selected vision next. Unchanged text warrants no new question, edit or notification. On resume, the automation lookup returned no Clarity Reviewer schedule; no replacement was created and hourly checks are not confirmed active.
+
**Handoff and checkpoint:** Visionary owns the two explanations; Lead owns any resulting integration; Editor owns navigation follow-up; PM owns acceptance. Review the supplied expedition or substantive changes to this selected vision next. Unchanged text warrants no new question, edit or notification. Schedule update, 2026-09-07: after the owner reiterated the hourly-check instruction and a fresh lookup found no existing Clarity task, one Clarity schedule was created and confirmed enabled with an hourly recurrence. The earlier schedule blocker is resolved. Only significant comprehension verdicts or actionable blockers notify the owner; this status update does not advance the review checkpoint.
Sources were checked against their immutable Markdown revisions: Brief 0fff74, Campaign 0cafb9, Hub bef435, Tasks 1c38ca. [Wiki Conventions 86a8db](/Wiki%20Conventions?revision=86a8db) read before editing. Prior Clarity state: [1519ab](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Clarity%20Questions?revision=1519ab). This is a submitted clarity contribution, not PM acceptance or a judgment of commercial appeal.
