2026-09-08 16:27:45
Anonymous:
PM forecast F1.2: actual outline completion and next scoped deliveries
hold the flood/design plan.md ..
@@ 10,19 10,21 @@
## Active outcomes
-
See the dated [Progress board](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Progress): **18 design packages,15 preparation-closed and3 open**, with decision status kept separate. The owner now requests reports every15 minutes while work is active, plus meaningful milestone/blocker updates. The owner also requires forward estimates: current F1 target for a complete first-pass game-design wiki is22 Sep (range18–29 Sep), with a coherent core targeted11 Sep (10–14 Sep). See the Progress forecast for completion definitions, staffing and assumptions.
+
See the dated [Progress board](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Progress): **19 design packages,16 preparation-closed and3 open**, with decision status kept separate. The owner now requests reports every15 minutes while work is active, plus meaningful milestone/blocker updates. The owner also requires forward estimates: current F1 target for a complete first-pass game-design wiki is22 Sep (range18–29 Sep), with a coherent core targeted11 Sep (10–14 Sep). See the Progress forecast for completion definitions, staffing and assumptions.
| Role | Bounded outcome | Actual status and dependency |
|---|---|---|
-
| Design Lead | Player Information372; owns the new article | First-survivor comparison closed368; new interface/accessibility draft estimated17:00–18:00 today |
-
| Systems | Whole Game Outline365; owns the new article | Outline369 and focused review370 complete; one author response371. Reviewed-outline window advanced to16:30–17:30 |
-
| Independent Reviewer | Independent criteria and preauthorised review of Player Information372 | Outline review370 complete; new criteria before the Lead information draft, then one focused review without another PM gate |
| Design Lead | Player Information379 author response; retains sole article ownership | Draft375/review376 complete; response target17:00 today, range16:45–17:15; PM dispositions without a second broad review |
+
| Systems | Survival And Loadout380; owns the new article | Outline17 closed378 at16:20; survival draft target17:00, range16:45–17:15; actual380 source reads verified |
+
| Independent Reviewer | Survival and Loadout380 independent criteria then one preauthorised review | Player Information376 complete; new criteria before seeing the Systems draft, then actual submission review without another PM gate |
+
| PM | Dated forecasts, source verification, decisions and ready handoffs | M0/M1 prepared early; M2–M4 unchanged. Final layout and first-survivor questions pending; UI estimate scope reconciliation active |
The PM marked conflicting old rules in their owning articles after a source impact audit. Permanent map placement is superseded; remembered positions are historical; death/rescue ordering is unresolved. The next consolidated update will follow a concrete shift comparison. Do not silently treat the former fixed-anchor alternative as owner-selected, or invent destruction, duplication or survivor loss to handle a shift.
## Ready for reaction
+
[Whole Game Outline](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Whole%20Game%20Outline) is preparation-closed378 after draft369, focused review370 and response374. It connects the opening to middle, ending and secret layers, including a later expedition and finite content bands. It is a planning scaffold: story/ending choices, quantities and complete estimate coverage remain open.
+
[Shifting Station Options](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Shifting%20Station%20Options) records the owner's selection of actions binding connected groups and the whole-station late puzzle. Moving districts and freely rearranged rooms remain prior alternatives. Its special local rescue reconnection is still a proposed exception, not automatic transfer.
[Connecting The Station](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Connecting%20The%20Station) completed focused review323 and response324, with PM disposition329/331. It retains permanent latches as a local candidate, but the deep whole-station puzzle is **unresolved**: a source can be reused to latch seams one after another, so scarcity alone does not establish the proposed global ordering problem. Seams and power machinery are unchosen. New independent originals340/342 were read and jointly released346–348. Systems comparison349 now evaluates room transformations, family bridges and simpler matching; the mechanism comparison preparation closed363 after review356 and response361; detailed whole-station content and owner mechanism/payoff choice remain open. A single late insight is PM's quality target for the owner's ambition, not an additional quoted owner requirement; combining earlier discoveries could also satisfy it. A final stable layout is proposed as a reward and is awaiting owner reaction.
