2026-09-15 18:07:45
Anonymous:
F2.29: patient scene complete; opening rewrite working with independent criteria ready
hold the flood/design plan.md ..
@@ 8,7 8,7 @@
The main reading path now begins with [The Game](/Hold%20The%20Flood/The%20Game), follows [three expeditions](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Expedition%20Proposal), returns to [the people aboard](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Coming%20Home), and opens into [discovery in the changing station](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Connecting%20The%20Station). [Hordes and Builds](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Hordes%20and%20Builds) explains the current examples; [Build Comparison](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Build%20Comparison) presents alternative controls and payoffs for owner reaction.
-
Sixteen proposal or editorial packages completed review and response today: builds/expeditions, hospital story/survival, regular growth on a renewed route, a second route state after permanent source seals, the six-page reading path, the moving-scan expedition, the short-rescue comparison, the station-completion payoff, the campaign scope comparison, the language journal, the whole-campaign overview, the cast and rescue map, the equipment guide, the Receiver Vault expedition, the enemy guide, and the repeated upgrade-choice comparison. [Combat Rules](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Combat%20Rules) and the room/encounter references describe the two concrete route states. They preserve completed work while giving fresh opposition a physical route. Other seal combinations and shifted layouts remain design work.
+
Seventeen proposal or editorial packages completed review and response today: builds/expeditions, hospital story/survival, regular growth on a renewed route, a second route state after permanent source seals, the six-page reading path, the moving-scan expedition, the short-rescue comparison, the station-completion payoff, the campaign scope comparison, the language journal, the whole-campaign overview, the cast and rescue map, the equipment guide, the Receiver Vault expedition, the enemy guide, the repeated upgrade-choice comparison, and the former-patient scene. [Combat Rules](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Combat%20Rules) and the room/encounter references describe the two concrete route states. They preserve completed work while giving fresh opposition a physical route. Other seal combinations and shifted layouts remain design work.
The new Ricochet and Gravity mechanisms remain proposed replacements for parts of the detailed build rules. The [hospital-story alternatives](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Hospital%20Story%20Directions) remain revisable. Completed review does not select them for the owner or establish fun, balance or duration.
@@ 60,11 60,17 @@
The [two-trip upgrade comparison](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Upgrade%20Choices) completed review, response and integration at **17:18**. The same equipment supports an electrical reach trade and a banked-disc/electrical hybrid. Both earned decisions have a tempting declined alternative. The proposal makes the shortcut's lost second choice explicit, explains the discoveries in place and shows how a small pool can run out of offers. Build and combat rules now link the comparison; its broader variety and intended pleasure remain design questions.
-
## Working now: a person in the crowd
+
## Ready to read: a person in the crowd
-
The [former-patient scene](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Hospital%20Story%20Directions) was submitted at **17:38**. Nadi Kelm once stopped a rehabilitation carrier because it moved before she was ready. The proposal connects that memory to one ordinary member of a ward horde, with discovery before or after the fight and an optional exchange with Ivo at home. Both core alternatives remain; a record-only version provides the simpler comparison.
+
The [former-patient scene](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Hospital%20Story%20Directions) completed review, response and integration at **17:59**. Nadi Kelm once stopped a rehabilitation carrier because it moved before she was ready. The full proposal lets the player recognise her altered body inside an ordinary horde, or discover a crossing trace later; card-only history supports a different conversation with Ivo. The simpler treatment keeps the record and memory without a marked body. Both remain proposals.
-
The independent critique is complete and Systems is making one correction: distinguish an actual crossing from merely waking the ward, match dialogue to the evidence obtained, restore the earlier ward-log clue and make Ivo's lines more natural. The correction target is **18:10**, likely **18:00–18:25**; reviewed proposal **18:50**, likely **18:20–19:35**. Records, presentation and dialogue still carry additional production costs.
+
## Working now: your first useful invention
+
+
Systems is rewriting [First Expedition Options](/Hold%20The%20Flood/First%20Expedition%20Options) around the player's first useful equipment discovery. The relay can already make a ready shield answer the same detected threat as the gun, trading away manual timing. The same physical part can instead control the station's rack and shutter. The rewrite should make that choice felt during extraction and lead naturally to the person knocking behind R-3.
+
+
The owner-selected opening remains. The author is working and the independent review criteria are ready. Draft target **19:15**, likely **18:50–19:35**; reviewed proposal **20:15**, likely **19:45–21:00**. Existing crowd sources, the difference between holding and permanently sealing a shutter, and the limits of the first rig constrain the scene. A later spectacular transformation is not being promised from the first relay.
+
+
The owner has been offered three short existing experiences for reaction: horde climax, coming home and opening. That optional taste feedback can steer priorities while authorized work continues.
One focused critique and one response belong to each bounded outcome. The outside-edit preservation audit is complete and its factual follow-ups are published; broader readability and design readiness remain open. States and estimates are on [Progress](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Progress).
