2026-09-10 17:26:52
Anonymous:
Remove review history and align superseded prose with current design rules
hold the flood/language expedition.md ..
@@ 1,6 1,6 @@
# Hold The Horde — Language Expedition
-
**Status.** A provisional proposal for review, not owner-approved. It works one expedition in which two alien languages both contribute, and shows what the player observes, believes, tests and decides. Token strings are readable text placeholders; no glyphs, alphabets, conlang or vocabulary catalogue are proposed. Who the builders and visitors were is replaceable candidate fiction, and the episode depends on no central-mystery direction.
+
**Status.** A provisional proposal, not owner-approved. It works one expedition in which two alien languages both contribute, and shows what the player observes, believes, tests and decides. Token strings are readable text placeholders; no glyphs, alphabets, conlang or vocabulary catalogue are proposed. Who the builders and visitors were is replaceable candidate fiction, and the episode depends on no central-mystery direction.
## The two languages
@@ 95,9 95,9 @@
On request, the journal may surface a previously captured record that looks visually similar to one the player is examining. It is fallible, it is separate from any claim about relation, direction or route, and manual comparison remains fully usable.
-
**What that costs and why I now accept it.** I previously argued for leaving all noticing unaided. What changed my position is that the alternative rests on a prediction I cannot support — that unaided noticing is where the discovery lives — while the burden it creates is concrete: with pairs many expeditions apart, a player can hold both halves and never bring them together. On-request similarity reduces some unaided noticing. It does not interpret, relate or route, and everything above still has to be done by the player.
+
**Reason and cost.** With pairs many expeditions apart, a player can hold both halves and never bring them together. On-request similarity reduces some unaided noticing. It does not interpret, relate or route, and everything above still has to be done by the player. Whether unaided noticing is central to the discovery remains unestablished.
-
**On confirmation.** Recording an actual arrival against a stated route link is not a correctness badge on a hypothesis, and this episode asks for nothing more. Without any record, diagnosis becomes harder rather than impossible: environmental evidence stays visible, and a player can often see why an attempt failed. Calling that "the player cannot tell" overstated it, and I have dropped it.
+
**On confirmation.** Recording an actual arrival against a stated route link is not a correctness badge on a hypothesis, and this episode asks for nothing more. Without any record, diagnosis becomes harder rather than impossible: environmental evidence stays visible, and a player can often see why an attempt failed.
