2026-09-10 17:26:50
Anonymous:
Remove review history and align superseded prose with current design rules
hold the flood/opening mechanism detail.md ..
@@ 2,24 2,6 @@
**Status.** Representative M4 design sample for the selected service-board opening, not owner-approved timing, balance, final geometry, implementation or evidence of usability. It details only the existing R02 Cargo Turn/R03 Collar Control window: the fixed board, rack, patient-bay shutter, one Fork Relay, two fasteners and one isolation bridge. It adds no room, encounter, portable part, mechanism identity, enemy, route, controller, resource or story fact. Quantities and occurrence-level control details introduced below remain proposals. All five owner questions remain unanswered.
| [Player Information And Options](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Player%20Information%20And%20Options) | `5d4f77cc1d9e13060e2c75c19520de0f891a8aa1fe79a5bdf490eb01c2c3e3f8` | 33,036 |
| [Save And Content State](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Save%20And%20Content%20State) | `dd69f8091879aafeb098ea0445f4acd44a10990f2bd1047b383b001193f63e29` | 20,243 |
-
| [Survival And Loadout](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Survival%20And%20Loadout) | `68df4f85f274791ee8202d82cb56aa851177fbb1830561909112ad48528525db` | 15,611 |
-
## The player-facing sequence
The astronaut leaves the ship through unchanged R01 Dock Mouth and enters R02 Cargo Turn. From the entry they can already distinguish two hostile lanes, the waist-high rack, the glass-front board, its two output lamps and the fixed glazed throat into R03. The board says that one local feed can hold either the bridge rack or the patient-bay shutter. A loose Fork in the maintenance cradle has one input and two ordered outputs matching the rig grammar. The player can therefore form the useful hypothesis before committing: this exact part may let one board command reach both holds.
@@ 128,14 110,10 @@
**Simpler authored alternative.** Lock the board/Fork choice when the first fastener begins and allow no reclaim or rig reassignment until the bridge pickup resolves. That reduces mid-objective property/control combinations and lets the opening use a shorter six-state specification. It is not chosen here because it contradicts the existing promise that an accessible Fork can be installed or retrieved later and removes the experiment of changing approach after one completed checkpoint. The chosen detail's cost is the larger transition/cue set, explicit lethal-boundary membership and more recovery variants.
-
## Deduplicated authoring and effort record
+
## Content and authoring requirements
New detail beyond the first pass is limited to: one maintained two-detent selector convention; exact output mapping; two numbered fastener checkpoints; sixteen transition records; eighteen case classes; thirteen placeholder cue families; the full fresh-state oxygen hand check; and the explicit board-current restoration gap. Existing R01–R03 identities, E01/P01 population, Fork/bridge objects, four rig parts, C/A/O values, event/wave rules, journal behavior, death transaction, compact topology and information policy are cross-references, not newly authored content. No new art, audio, animation, room, encounter, mechanism, part, evidence object or narrative scene is counted.
-
Observable elapsed activity for this draft began with PM assignment 565 at **2026-09-09 12:53:41 +03:00**. Source lock was complete by approximately **12:56 +03:00**; publication time belongs in the submission receipt. These timestamps are wall-clock observations, not productive role-hours and not evidence of future throughput.
-
-
Judgment for finishing this one representative sample is **14–24 role-hours total**: Systems detailed authoring and source/diff checks 9–15, one focused independent review 3–5, and one bounded response/readback 2–4. At initial submission, the forward allowance is therefore **5–9 role-hours** for the authorized review and possible response. Confidence is low-medium because review may expose a missing control state; exact geometry and presentation remain deliberately outside. Do not multiply this sample by forty rooms or use its chat turnaround to forecast M4, implementation or campaign duration.
-
## Decision record
**Proposed choice:** use the detailed maintained-selector, locally reconfigurable Fork contract above for this representative sample. **Reason:** it preserves the selected discovery—that one reusable part changes both personal rig and station infrastructure—while making object location, control ownership, commits, refusals and recovery inspectable. **Accepted cost:** sixteen transitions, more cue variants and a difficult but explicit control trade under horde/oxygen pressure. **Reopen if:** focused review finds a source contradiction; an authorized later implementation cannot keep the two lanes and controls legible; or real-player evidence shows the mid-opening reconfiguration cannot be understood. This paper walkthrough establishes none of those outcomes.
