2026-09-08 18:22:43
Anonymous:
Record State and Production closeouts, regional review, and aligned v1 scope forecast
hold the flood/design coverage.md ..
@@ 2,7 2,9 @@
**PM coverage assessment, 8 September 2026.** This is the remaining-work map for the [whole-game outline](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Whole%20Game%20Outline), alongside the dated [Progress and forecast](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Progress). It is management work, not an additional completed gameplay package.
-
Across fifteen major areas, **six have usable first-pass contracts, eight have examples or alternatives, and one still needs a dedicated prepared contract: production**. These are coverage categories, not weighted progress or a percentage of the game. Even an area with usable rules still needs its finite content, edge cases and integration. “Written” does not mean owner-approved, implemented or validated.
+
Across fifteen major areas, **seven have usable first-pass contracts and eight have examples or alternatives**. These are coverage categories, not weighted progress or a percentage of the game. Even an area with usable rules still needs its finite content, edge cases and integration. “Written” does not mean owner-approved, implemented or validated.
+
+
Eight domains remain partial, and accepted rules still need their finite inventories and integration before v1 is complete.
The first complete wiki must describe actual behavior, progression and consequences across every major area. It may use clearly labelled provisional defaults and numerical tuning; a major area left only as “TBD” does not qualify. The later detailed-content milestone specifies the individual authored rooms, clues, encounters and scenes.
@@ 25,14 27,14 @@
| Colony and home projects | [Home example](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Coming%20Home), [cooperative project](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Home%20Projects) | Home-loop state map and five person-linked projects with voluntary contributions, results and equipment reclaim | Draft using an explicit provisional no-upkeep baseline. A management economy needs an owner decision before adoption. |
| Information, controls and accessibility | Usable [first-pass contract](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Player%20Information) | Cue/interaction inventory, journal/manifest structure and option/default interactions, including non-colour/non-audio equivalents | Most work can proceed. Mechanical uncertainties affect their particular displays. Full journal pause is settled. Existing article ownership must be respected. |
| Save, identity and content authoring | Usable [first-pass contract](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Save%20And%20Content%20State), preparation-closed417 at438cdf35 | Complete transition/commit catalogue, placement/reference matrix and resolved conditional branches and recovery policy | First-pass identity/continuity requirements are prepared. Save policy, rescue/shift order and full-station behavior remain open; engineering/migrations remain later. |
-
| Content scope and production feasibility | Dedicated prepared contract still missing; [Production Scope24](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Production%20Scope) submitted under418, in focused review | Deduplicated finite inventory, reuse assumptions, unique authoring/state costs, asset categories, Unity/Steam constraints and explicit scope cuts | PM owns24; reviewed19:40(19:05–20:10) today Jerusalem. Draft hours remain unreviewed; scope commitments/purchases need owner approval, and actual asset licences/specifications require checking. |
+
| Content scope and production feasibility | Usable [first-pass scope contract](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Production%20Scope), prepared423 atc1a60388 | Deduplicated finite inventory, reuse assumptions, unique authoring/state costs, asset categories, Unity/Steam constraints and explicit scope cuts | PM24 closed423;144–247role-hourv1 planning allowance with explicit room/mechanism depth. Scope/band/cuts remain proposed; actual asset licences/specifications need checking. |
| Development and validation handoff | Usable [first-pass plan](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Development%20And%20Validation%20Handoff), prepared410 | Final v1-specific packet with exact revisions, development scope, conditions, staffing, estimates and decision criteria | Eleven risks/gates are mapped, including sustained progression. Actual prototypes, code, simulations, assets and playtests require explicit phase authorization. |
## Work sequence and forecast
| Window, Jerusalem dates | Planned result | Staffing/dependency |
|---|---|---|
-
| 8 Sep | Catalogue, trap/encounter, handoff and save/content-state first passes prepared; Production24 and Regional Map25 submitted under418, in focused review | PM and existing GPT Systems continue. Both Claude roles stay paused until the owner confirms their return. |
+
| 8 Sep | Catalogue, trap/encounter, handoff and save/content-state first passes prepared; Production24 prepared423; Regional Map25 draft420 in focused review | PM and existing GPT Systems continue. Both Claude roles stay paused until the owner confirms their return. |
| 9–11 Sep, core buffer to 14 Sep | Shared core rules and identity requirements; start region, cast, language and production work | Two additional specialist setups planned 9–10 Sep. Ready scopes, not provider availability alone, determine assignments. |
| 14–18 Sep | Domain designs and finite inventories sufficiently concrete for cross-domain review | Content counts and major story/mechanism choices must be dispositioned or visibly provisional. |
| Target 22 Sep; likely 18–29 Sep | Complete first-pass wiki with integrated interfaces and a development handoff outline | PM integration and review are on the critical path; more writers do not remove that work. |
@@ 48,4 50,4 @@
Track deliverable and depth separately: first-pass rule set, finite content inventory, and later implementation. Count a shared survivor scene/colony project/clue/region objective once, then estimate only its distinct additional work. Keep package review/response, PM cross-page integration and whole-game coherence review separate without double counting. Production24's response explicitly assigns the24module/40room/12mechanism v1 brief minimums to one20–34author-hour package, beyond objective allocation. This retains the placed-mechanism obligation rather than silently deferring it. Detailed campaign authoring extends these briefs; do not charge both full depths. See [Production Scope](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Production%20Scope) for the proposed revised144–247role-hour v1 allowance and separate review/response/integration; it is a planning estimate, not logged labor.
-
This map is based on the current owner brief, Whole Game Outline revision65595abf, the linked owning articles and a source-by-source PM coverage audit. The catalogue was subsequently read at submission396, received one focused review/response397/399 and was preparation-closed400 at revision737b3cfd. Outcome21 trap/encounter and22 handoff first passes were closed410;23 save/content-state closed417 at18:09:56 Jerusalem, final438cdf35. Production24 and Regional Discovery Map25 were assigned418; their drafts and estimates are not reviewed outcomes. The separately found Rescue Shift Proposal and Station Assembly Example remain unadopted intake407, not completed shared integration. The management checkpoint retains the exact inspected source revisions. No page count, model agreement or desk review establishes fun, balance, usability, performance or campaign duration.
+
This map is based on the current owner brief, Whole Game Outline revision65595abf, the linked owning articles and a source-by-source PM coverage audit. The catalogue was subsequently read at submission396, received one focused review/response397/399 and was preparation-closed400 at revision737b3cfd. Outcome21 trap/encounter and22 handoff first passes were closed410;23 save/content-state closed417 at18:09:56 Jerusalem, final438cdf35. Production24 closed423 after scoped response421/422; Regional Discovery Map25 draft420 remains in review. Scope estimates are reviewed planning assumptions, not validated labor or adopted content counts. The separately found Rescue Shift Proposal and Station Assembly Example remain unadopted intake407, not completed shared integration. The management checkpoint retains the exact inspected source revisions. No page count, model agreement or desk review establishes fun, balance, usability, performance or campaign duration.
