2026-09-08 13:07:35
Anonymous:
Prioritise owner decisions and record recovered reviewer handoff
hold the flood/design plan.md ..
@@ 2,17 2,23 @@
The team is designing a discovery-first survivorlike under the [Owner Brief](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Brief), with expressive builds, meaningful hordes and an authored colony. The work below is design only. Written comparisons establish a proposal and its dependencies; they do not demonstrate fun, readability, balance, production feasibility or campaign duration.
-
## Current milestone: a concrete language expedition
+
## Current milestone: integrate the owner decisions
+
+
The owner accepted connected equipment combinations, shared oxygen/equipment/loot capacity, practical clue-based exploration and the route/work horde rhythm. Equipment loans at home are tentative. The owner rejected death caches: carried equipment and new loot return aboard on death. Persistent-station and cooperative-rescue proposals await clearer explanation, not inferred approval. The [Owner Brief](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Brief) records these decisions.
+
+
PM249 assigns one bounded integration across each author's owned pages. Lead rewrites Death and Persistence and resolves direct contradictions in its dependent scenes; Systems finishes its active language revision then resolves the corresponding equipment, survival and mystery contracts. No replacement punishment, repeated preference question or broad rewrite is assigned. Old cache statements are superseded now and are being removed.
+
+
## Parallel milestone: a concrete language expedition
All independent language originals were saved before peer new conclusions, verified and released233–235. Assignment241 gives Lead sole ownership of [Language Expedition](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Language%20Expedition) and Systems sole ownership of [Language and Journal](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Language%20and%20Journal). These forthcoming articles will connect two distinct alien languages, observable clues, competing interpretations, useful assistance and a consequential player choice with the actual journal interactions. Feedback and help remain provisional; neither automatic certainty nor withheld confirmation is inherently superior. The owner-required journal pause remains fixed.
-
Reviewer retains [Language Design Evidence](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Language%20Design%20Evidence), with a focused source correction assigned before a preauthorised review of the two submitted language articles. Heaven's Vault permits narrative progress amid uncertainty but later context can reveal wrong guesses; Chants of Sennaar has developer-reported playtesting, not a public validation dataset for this project. Fixed geography does not rule out adaptive content selection, and confirmation/help need not eliminate interpretation. The exact evidence corrections and review completion boundaries are in241. Reviewer host delivery is currently unavailable; author work can proceed, with PM tracking review recovery.
+
Reviewer retains [Language Design Evidence](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Language%20Design%20Evidence), with a focused source correction assigned before a preauthorised review of the two submitted language articles. Heaven's Vault permits narrative progress amid uncertainty but later context can reveal wrong guesses; Chants of Sennaar has developer-reported playtesting, not a public validation dataset for this project. Fixed geography does not rule out adaptive content selection, and confirmation/help need not eliminate interpretation. The exact evidence corrections and review completion boundaries are in241. The original Reviewer host has recovered under the same identity and automatically received241. It is correcting the evidence and will review the actual submitted language revisions.
-
Both initial language articles are submitted and actually read. PM246 assigns bounded corrections to the clue-to-route inference, substantive visitor-language example, interpretation of survivor labels, and the distinction between completed and inconclusive local tests. Systems already replaced freeform grading with separately selected outcome links. The original Reviewer correction/review remains pending host recovery. Authors write substantial parallel outcomes with an early shared example and final actual-source coherence check. No full conlang, artwork, implementation, prototype, simulation or playtest is assigned. PM verifies sources and accepts integration; author submission or agreement does not establish fun, accessibility, balance or content feasibility.
+
Both initial language articles are submitted and actually read. PM246 assigns bounded corrections to the clue-to-route inference, substantive visitor-language example, interpretation of survivor labels, and the distinction between completed and inconclusive local tests. Systems already replaced freeform grading with separately selected outcome links. The original Reviewer correction/review is active after verified host recovery. Authors write substantial parallel outcomes with an early shared example and final actual-source coherence check. No full conlang, artwork, implementation, prototype, simulation or playtest is assigned. PM verifies sources and accepts integration; author submission or agreement does not establish fun, accessibility, balance or content feasibility.
## Parallel work: final mystery comparison
-
[Mystery Directions](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Mystery%20Directions) and [Mystery Consequences](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Mystery%20Consequences) have completed one review230 and coordinated response232, with final submissions238/240 actually read. PM completed narrow final integration after ownership transfer241 and returned ownership to Lead/Systems in the comparison disposition. The three concrete story cards are ready for owner reaction. No central direction is adopted and no second broad review is pending.
+
[Mystery Directions](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Mystery%20Directions) and [Mystery Consequences](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Mystery%20Consequences) have completed one review230 and coordinated response232, with final submissions238/240 actually read. PM completed narrow final integration after ownership transfer241 and returned ownership to Lead/Systems in the comparison disposition. The three story candidates completed comparison preparation247. Their inventory-return explanations now need the narrow owner-decision update249 before being pitched as the current version. No central direction is adopted and no second broad review is pending.
The final comparison distinguishes departure permission from service cancellation, uses an individual casualty tag and arranged failure for the Unit, adds a quarantine-control cause for the Registry, and gives the Clinic a concrete programme intervention with coherent evidence. These are explicit candidate choices and costs, not owner commitments. Ordinary revival continues while the player pursues the deeper path; final departure ends it. Causal eligibility does not adopt global survivor mortality. The owner will receive concrete story alternatives before commitment, not an abstract forced choice.
