2026-09-08 15:57:00
Anonymous:
Set forecast baseline and whole-game outline milestone
hold the flood/design plan.md ..
@@ 10,13 10,13 @@
## Active outcomes
-
See the dated [Progress board](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Progress): **16 design packages,13 preparation-closed and3 open**, with decision status kept separate. The owner now requests reports every15 minutes while work is active, plus meaningful milestone/blocker updates.
+
See the dated [Progress board](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Progress): **17 design packages,14 preparation-closed and3 open**, with decision status kept separate. The owner now requests reports every15 minutes while work is active, plus meaningful milestone/blocker updates. The owner also requires forward estimates: current F1 target for a complete first-pass game-design wiki is22 Sep (range18–29 Sep), with a coherent core targeted11 Sep (10–14 Sep). See the Progress forecast for completion definitions, staffing and assumptions.
| Role | Bounded outcome | Actual status and dependency |
|---|---|---|
-
| Design Lead | Two first-survivor encounter/rescue/homecoming options350 | Original session recovered; two options submitted358 and author stopped; Reviewer357 examining source |
-
| Systems | New whole-station practical comparison349; owns Connecting The Station | Comparison355 and focused review356 complete; one author response357 assigned |
-
| Independent Reviewer | Focused review of forthcoming First Survivor after independent criteria checkpoint | Semantic package closed353; station review356 done. Independent survivor criteria359 saved; reviewing actual Lead358 submission |
+
| Design Lead | Two first-survivor encounter/rescue/homecoming options350 | One focused review362 and author response364 complete; PM checking actual revision for decision pack forecast16:30–17:00 |
+
| Systems | Whole Game Outline365; owns the new article | Station comparison closed363; new whole-game outline draft estimated17:30–18:30 today |
+
| Independent Reviewer | Independent completeness criteria and preauthorised review of Whole Game Outline365 | Survivor review362 complete. Save whole-game criteria first, then review actual Systems outline without another PM gate |
The PM marked conflicting old rules in their owning articles after a source impact audit. Permanent map placement is superseded; remembered positions are historical; death/rescue ordering is unresolved. The next consolidated update will follow a concrete shift comparison. Do not silently treat the former fixed-anchor alternative as owner-selected, or invent destruction, duplication or survivor loss to handle a shift.
@@ 25,7 25,7 @@
[Shifting Station Options](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Shifting%20Station%20Options) records the owner's selection of actions binding connected groups and the whole-station late puzzle. Moving districts and freely rearranged rooms remain prior alternatives. Its special local rescue reconnection is still a proposed exception, not automatic transfer.
-
[Connecting The Station](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Connecting%20The%20Station) completed focused review323 and response324, with PM disposition329/331. It retains permanent latches as a local candidate, but the deep whole-station puzzle is **unresolved**: a source can be reused to latch seams one after another, so scarcity alone does not establish the proposed global ordering problem. Seams and power machinery are unchosen. New independent originals340/342 were read and jointly released346–348. Systems comparison349 now evaluates room transformations, family bridges and simpler matching; the whole-station outcome remains open. A single late insight is PM's quality target for the owner's ambition, not an additional quoted owner requirement; combining earlier discoveries could also satisfy it. A final stable layout is proposed as a reward and is awaiting owner reaction.
+
[Connecting The Station](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Connecting%20The%20Station) completed focused review323 and response324, with PM disposition329/331. It retains permanent latches as a local candidate, but the deep whole-station puzzle is **unresolved**: a source can be reused to latch seams one after another, so scarcity alone does not establish the proposed global ordering problem. Seams and power machinery are unchosen. New independent originals340/342 were read and jointly released346–348. Systems comparison349 now evaluates room transformations, family bridges and simpler matching; the mechanism comparison preparation closed363 after review356 and response361; detailed whole-station content and owner mechanism/payoff choice remain open. A single late insight is PM's quality target for the owner's ambition, not an additional quoted owner requirement; combining earlier discoveries could also satisfy it. A final stable layout is proposed as a reward and is awaiting owner reaction.
[First Expedition Options](/Hold%20The%20Flood/First%20Expedition%20Options) completed review325, response326 and closeout333. The owner has now selected **Option A**, the reusable-machinery opening, recorded344–345. One opening discovers a reusable part that powers both equipment and station machinery; the other discovers a risky route by watching a body lift. Temporary deployment has explicit time/capacity costs, and the lift needs extra local content. Both preserve natural death, carried property and existing connections. Option A is the selected direction; detailed rooms, values and loadout remain proposals, and neither opening is validated.
