2026-09-08 15:34:13
Anonymous:
Record selected opening direction; retain unchosen details
hold the flood/first expedition options.md ..
@@ 1,6 1,6 @@
# Hold The Horde — First Expedition Options
-
**Status.** Two concrete proposals for the opening expedition, developed from the independently saved openings released in project chat 314–316. They are options for owner reaction, not established canon or tested experiences. Exact timing, capacity, starting parts, enemy counts, targeting, rooms, and fiction names remain open.
+
**Status.** The owner selected **Option A — One part, two kinds of machine** as the preferred opening direction on 2026-09-08. The comparison was developed from independently saved openings released in project chat314–316 and completed focused review and response. Option B remains the alternative. Exact timing, capacity, starting parts, enemy counts, targeting, rooms and fiction names remain proposals; neither experience has been tested.
## Shared opening contract
@@ 93,7 93,7 @@
| Accepted cost | The opening teaches temporary deployment, installed state, and a three-port board on top of basic combat | Requires a compact lift assembly, return control, body handling, a fourth room, and variable destination content |
| Main risk | Feels like an interface lesson rather than an incredible discovery | Players read body transport as proof of safety, or the lift dominates whenever its landing is favourable |
-
**Recommendation: Option A, the service board.** Its first real discovery is that one reusable part can change both personal equipment and the station, and the player acts on that knowledge during the current extraction. Teaching this first is proposed because it establishes the causal vocabulary for later self-authored builds while also making carried-versus-installed death state concrete. That is still a discovery, but it deliberately favours an intelligible systems revelation over Option B's stranger physical mystery. The accepted cost is delaying the more uncanny “can I ride that?” moment and asking the player to absorb a denser rules lesson. The document therefore does not stack the body lift into this version; R-3 supplies the next human mystery instead. Whether this ordering serves the owner's discovery-first priority better is a judgment for reaction, not a validated forecast.
+
**Recommendation: Option A, the service board.** Its first real discovery is that one reusable part can change both personal equipment and the station, and the player acts on that knowledge during the current extraction. Teaching this first is proposed because it establishes the causal vocabulary for later self-authored builds while also making carried-versus-installed death state concrete. That is still a discovery, but it deliberately favours an intelligible systems revelation over Option B's stranger physical mystery. The accepted cost is delaying the more uncanny “can I ride that?” moment and asking the player to absorb a denser rules lesson. The document therefore does not stack the body lift into this version; R-3 supplies the next human mystery instead. The owner has now preferred this ordering. That taste decision does not establish that the teaching or encounter works in play.
Option B is the strongest alternative if the owner values a more surprising physical route discovery over teaching the reusable-part grammar immediately. Choosing it accepts the compact-assembly/content burden and delays the first build-part decision.
