2026-09-07 12:05:17
Anonymous:
EXT102 r17: submit product verdict and X37 route-value finding; retain all PM and specialist evidence
hold the flood/tasks.md ..
@@ 39,6 39,14 @@
No duplicate was created; hourly checks are not confirmed active. This does not block the submitted
written review and is not a request for the owner to relay content questions.
+
## EXT102 r17 — resumed product review submitted
+
+
**2026-09-07 · External Game Critic · In review; PM owns acceptance.** [External Critique 2de127](/Hold%20The%20Flood/External%20Critique?revision=2de127) reviews [Brief 0fff74](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Brief?revision=0fff74) and [Campaign 0cafb9 §3.2](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Campaign?revision=0cafb9), with [World 7b8ad1](/Hold%20The%20Flood/World%20And%20Mystery?revision=7b8ad1), [Build Paths 6d6d1d](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Equipment/Build%20Paths?revision=6d6d1d) and [shared rules 5322f4](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Mechanics/Power%20And%20Attraction?revision=5322f4). The Visionary-specific expedition remains due; the existing Lead scene is concrete enough for this scoped review.
+
+
**Verdict:** promising for players who want understanding machinery to change crowd survival and future routes. **One finding, X37:** the middle Tram return begins with Rail/pass open and stairs available, yet its featured Coil plan incurs combat and loses the harvested charge without a demonstrated advantage for the investigation. Compare against taking the stairs immediately; answer with an actual benefit or overlooked constraint, or use the quick reconnaissance here and demonstrate the costly build at a suitable existing intervention. Do not remove a free route or force a wait to exercise equipment. The finding is a design judgment about this scene's value evidence, not a validated optimal route or a rejection of Coil everywhere.
+
+
**Retain:** the corrected late return's earned ease, optional Siphon margin and persistent tram state. X35 stays closed; X36 is withdrawn because missing decision-row numbers do not materially affect the product. Lead/Visionary own the design response; PM owns disposition. Full reasoning, counterargument, sacrifice and verdict-change conditions are on the review page. Written review only; no development or player testing.
+
## PMR008 — reviewed evidence and focused follow-through
**2026-09-07 · [Full findings and exact source revisions](/Hold%20the%20Flood/PM%20Reviews/PMR008).** PMU008's Visionary-first priority above remains primary. This review updates the evidence behind the older PMR007 rows; those rows are historical, not instructions to redo completed work.
