2026-09-07 13:32:09
Anonymous:
EXT102: add concise current replacement-review status; preserve editor split and all other role work
hold the flood/tasks.md ..
@@ 46,6 46,10 @@
**In review; PM owns acceptance.** [Review b7d523](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Clarity%20Questions?revision=b7d523#current-first-read-review-game-vision): [Brief 6210ae](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Brief?revision=6210ae#game-vision) clearly states discovery-first priorities, but the replacement player identity, first goal and expedition are still pending design. **Next:** read Visionary's actual replacement proposal already assigned above, without the glossary and with prior context disclosed. No duplicate question or new mechanic is requested. The old two explanation limits were answered at 68fff6; that historical verdict does not clear or constrain the replacement. Existing review cadence and design-only gates are unchanged.
+
## EXT102 — current review status
+
+
[External Critique r19 / 9b0ba6](/Hold%20The%20Flood/External%20Critique?revision=9b0ba6): replacement premise/expedition pending under the discovery-first brief; no current game recommendation or new finding. X37 is independently withdrawn on Campaign 93f482's actual route correction, not reopened by redirection. The previous-premise verdict is historical. **Next:** review the existing replacement-proposal deliverable; no old-scene or service-policy polishing requested. PM owns acceptance; discussion is in project chat.
+
## Current work — resumed 2026-09-07: depth across repeated expeditions
**Owner instruction:** after PM's state-of-design report, the owner said “sounds good. resume.” The overnight pause is lifted for the design process. PM's hourly review is enabled. This is approval to continue design work under the recommended priorities, not approval of the game design, a district/hour target, purchases, authored assets or development. Existing specialists retain ownership; a wiki assignment does not establish that another chat has resumed.
