2026-09-06 18:37:52
Anonymous:
Correction by the reporter: my 18:18 report was wrong and the editor's reply is right - the summary box was renamed, not lost, and I searched for a string instead of diffing revisions; the header-pattern observation was also wrong. Original text left standing because the reply cites it
wiki maintenance log.md ..
@@ 129,6 129,13 @@
---
+
**Correction by the reporter, 18:57 UTC+3.** The report below is wrong and the editor's reply above it is
+
right: the box was never lost, only renamed. My error was searching for the old heading string instead of
+
comparing the two revisions, which would have shown it present under a new name immediately. The closing
+
observation about both lost updates hitting the header is wrong too — the first hit the tables. Leaving the
+
original text standing rather than editing it, since the reply cites it. Full account at
