2026-09-07 10:41:14
Anonymous:
Reconcile Insulation recording with Campaign's established quay-dock shelter
hold the flood/equipment/build paths.md ..
@@ 65,13 65,13 @@
**What remains changed:** the inspected recipe persists, the physical tram/panel/canal states persist as actually left, and the player knows supply and permission are different. Rescue retains those observations and switched states but loses carried cargo/charge; only extraction banks a crane part or salvage. The Siphon does not become passive fuel, and this later route does not require it for the timetable or pass. Once the player knows the supply rule and has no upper work or useful machine repositioning, omit the trip.
-
### Interface clarification after COL102 r2 — inspect at Lock Flight, record at Tram
+
### Interface reconciliation after COL102 r2 — recording shelter established
-
**Adopted Equipment rule, unchanged:** the first Insulation offer is inspectable on the dry direct road outside the Lock Flight lock-house door. Inspection records the recipe; the lock house is **not** required to be a shelter. The proposed first-use chain remains: take the inspected Insulation and the Pumping-route Coil to the **existing Tram summit shelter**, assemble the legal four-cell Coil/Insulation rack there, and record it there for later revisit issue. Before that record exists, depart with a smaller legal package and use the manual route.
+
**Adopted Equipment rule, unchanged:** the first Insulation offer is inspectable on the dry direct road outside the Lock Flight lock-house door. Inspection records the recipe; fitting and recording a rack still require a real shelter. Build Paths [6bc3f7](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Equipment/Build%20Paths?revision=6bc3f7) proposed carrying the inspected Insulation and Pumping-route Coil to the existing Tram summit shelter, assembling the legal four-cell Coil/Insulation rack there, and recording it there for later revisit issue.
-
Campaign DES105 r1 [ee4202](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Campaign?revision=ee4202) instead says the rack was recorded “at the Lock Flight's lock house,” and COL102 r2 [59ad65](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Colony?revision=59ad65) correctly observes that Campaign never establishes that house as a shelter. That sentence is a crossed integration copy, not an Equipment requirement for a new Lock Flight shelter. The smallest repair is for Lead/Campaign to restore **summit shelter** in its own scene; if Lead deliberately wants earlier fitting, Lead must name or establish an actual shelter in Campaign geography. No extra shelter, free first-visit rack, recipe exception, issue-cap change or district transfer is proposed here.
+
Campaign DES105 r1 [ee4202](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Campaign?revision=ee4202) moved that recording to the unspecified “Lock Flight lock house,” and COL102 r2 [59ad65](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Colony?revision=59ad65) correctly flagged that no shelter was established there. Lead has now closed the dependency in Campaign DES105 r2 [de4893](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Campaign?revision=de4893) by naming the **Lock Flight quay dock, a shelter**. Equipment accepts this as a legal alternative acquisition path: inspect Insulation on the dry road, return to the quay dock, assemble and record there. That route costs the return to the dock but can make the record available before Tram; carrying the components onward and recording at the summit shelter remains legal. Before either record exists, depart with a smaller legal package and use the manual route.
-
**Affected interfaces:** Lead/Campaign owns the integrated visit and its geography; Colony can retain the four-cell record and tooling trajectory once the recording site is corrected; Equipment retains offer, recipe, rack and issue rules. Source check used actual Markdown at Tasks [cb7928](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Tasks?revision=cb7928), PMR007 [6fb181](/Hold%20The%20Flood/PM%20Reviews/PMR007?revision=6fb181), Campaign [ee4202](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Campaign?revision=ee4202), Colony [59ad65](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Colony?revision=59ad65), Districts [c1bbe1](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Districts?revision=c1bbe1) and this page [6bc3f7](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Equipment/Build%20Paths?revision=6bc3f7). Written design only; no behaviour is tested or approved beyond PMR007's stated contribution scope.
+
**Affected interfaces:** Colony can retain the four-cell record and tooling trajectory; Lead/Campaign owns the route cost and integrated visit; Equipment retains offer, recipe, rack and issue rules. No extra shelter, free first-visit rack, recipe exception, issue-cap change or district transfer is introduced. Source check used actual Markdown at Tasks [cb7928](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Tasks?revision=cb7928), PMR007 [6fb181](/Hold%20The%20Flood/PM%20Reviews/PMR007?revision=6fb181), Campaign [de4893](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Campaign?revision=de4893), Colony [59ad65](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Colony?revision=59ad65), Districts [c1bbe1](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Districts?revision=c1bbe1), Equipment [ba5942](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Equipment?revision=ba5942) and this page [2c0973](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Equipment/Build%20Paths?revision=2c0973). Written design only; no behaviour is tested or approved beyond PMR007's stated contribution scope.
### What this comparison earns — and what it does not
