**Status:** Provisional comparison for focused review. The Owner Brief requires limited carried oxygen, death on depletion, discovery-first play, meaningful hordes and expressive builds. These timing and record rules are proposals, not adopted canon or evidence of gameplay quality. Notebook availability during immediate threat awaits the owner’s preference.
+
**Status:** Provisional comparison for focused review. The Owner Brief requires limited carried oxygen, death on depletion, discovery-first play, meaningful hordes and expressive builds. It also requires the rest of the game—including enemies, oxygen and other world activity—to pause while the journal is open, even during combat. The record format, capture costs, display behavior and wider oxygen rhythm below remain proposals, not adopted canon or evidence of gameplay quality.
Oxygen and threats continue whenever the astronaut samples or changes the world: positioning, watching an event, manipulating a mechanism or committing a record. When the notebook is available, reading and comparison pause the world. Its display may inspect stored records and the current frozen view already visible to the astronaut; it cannot advance an event, reveal another angle, complete an interaction or create a record.
+
Oxygen and threats continue whenever the astronaut samples or changes the world: positioning, watching an event, manipulating a mechanism or committing a record. When the journal is open, the rest of the game pauses, including during combat; this is an owner requirement. The proposed display may inspect stored records and the current frozen view already visible to the astronaut, but cannot advance an event, reveal another angle, complete an interaction or create a record.
-
A proposed record is one player-framed still of visible evidence plus its location: no motion, replay, unseen context, label or deduction. Framing and committing it are in-world actions. Recording buys portability, cross-location comparison and something concrete to show survivors.
+
A proposed record is one player-framed still of visible evidence plus its location: no motion, replay, unseen context, automatic label or deduction. Framing and committing it are in-world actions. Recording buys portability, cross-location comparison and something concrete to show survivors.
-
Notebook access during immediate danger awaits owner preference. **Pause anywhere** is the PM recommendation and accepts interrupted tension. **Threat-gated pause** requires making space to reflect and risks a “secure, then inspect” rhythm. Neither is owner canon pending relay.
+
The journal remains accessible during immediate danger and is not gated on clearing threats. This requirement applies to the journal, not automatically to every other menu. Pausing a dangerous moment interrupts horde tension; that is an accepted cost of the owner’s preference, not a pending branch.
This preserves a real expedition cost for investigating while avoiding a cost based on the player’s reading speed. It also permits an epiphany in the station: reflection is not forced aboard ship. Free interface time is justified here as a readability/accessibility proposal, not an owner requirement or an automatic consequence of “discovery first.”
@@ 17,7 17,7 @@
| Notice an unfamiliar clue | Continue normally; noticing adds no separate charge | Only what is currently perceptible; choose whether to stop |
| Position or watch an ongoing event | Continue | New angles, timing and sequence require real in-world exposure |
| Manipulate, frame or commit a record | Continue until the action completes | One visible still and location; framing may omit useful context |
-
| Read or compare in station | Paused when notebook access is allowed; combat availability pending | Stored stills and the already-visible frozen view only; no new angle, event progress or action completion |
+
| Read or compare in station | Rest of game paused, including enemies and oxygen, even during combat (owner requirement) | Stored stills and the already-visible frozen view only; no new angle, event progress or action completion |
| Think aboard the ship | No expedition oxygen or threat | Compare records, seek survivor context and prepare a return |
Example: during running time, the player watches two mechanisms reverse flow and captures a post-reversal still at each, including the repeated mark and direction indicator. Paused comparison shows the common mark; it does not replay or discover motion. That suggests a detour, costing oxygen and return margin. Aboard ship, a survivor recognizes a human retrofit, informing the next route or loadout without translating the alien system.
@@ 32,8 32,8 @@
## Decision record and reopening conditions
-
Both initial positions separated paused reading from physical observation but emphasized different places and costs. This article makes field comparison explicit: reflecting on available information need not sample the world. That preserves in-station realization while accepting interrupted tension and possible capture dominance.
+
Pausing the journal separates reflection on available information from sampling new world information. The proposed record/display boundary keeps positioning, watching, manipulation and capture inside running world time. Together they preserve in-station realization while accepting interrupted tension and possible capture dominance.
-
Reopen the default if planned core mysteries repeatedly need prolonged physical manipulation, or if later owner-authorized observation shows that players either capture indiscriminately or abandon clues because the in-world recording cost overwhelms curiosity. No such validation exists yet.
+
Revisit the proposed record format or world-action boundary if planned core mysteries repeatedly need prolonged physical manipulation, or if later owner-authorized observation shows indiscriminate capture or abandoned clues. The owner-required journal pause is not reopened by those findings. No such validation exists yet.
Important dependency: recorded locations must remain findable after a return, and the fate of stored in-game records on death must be explicit. Preserving them rewards risky discovery; losing them makes depletion threaten stored reference material as well as cargo. Neither rule can erase what the human player remembers or personally noted. This comparison does not decide map persistence or the wider death-loss system.
