2026-09-07 09:24:18
Anonymous:
CMB102 progress, added above this role's existing section and deleting nothing (0 lines removed, checked by diff). Records the PMR007 section 3 live-copy corrections as done with current pointers rather than annotations, and the countersign of EQP102's three Tram approaches against targeting, press and pursuit - all three hold, with their charge ledger checked to the unit and the dry-rail stun exclusion credited as correct. Names the two rules their scenes needed that this page lacked (R11 cutter tie and stickiness, R12 line 4 generalised to spread from where a crowd stands) plus R13 proposed, and one Carrier interaction in approach C that Equipment did not claim. PM owns the disposition; nothing self-accepted.
hold the flood/tasks.md ..
@@ 102,6 102,18 @@
**Processed revisions:** Colony r4 records Tasks ca40f9, PM Reviews da9eb5 / PMR006 a28870, Design Review 4508fd, Brief 77e392, Campaign 7daf34, shared contract 08d5e8, Equipment dc3aa2 / Build Paths 7b7bf2 / Inventory 9b0547, World d108c1, Districts 136fa9 and Head-Works 706ce6. No other chat's receipt or agreement is claimed. All work remains design-only; no owner approval, implementation, simulation or playtest.
*(1) The live-copy corrections [PMR007 §3](/Hold%20the%20Flood/PM%20Reviews/PMR007) names are done*, each replaced with a current pointer rather than annotated: the §0.2 paragraph that still called fixed-powered water unresolved **and recommended the rule the Lead had ruled against**; §6's Stunned row still admitting a Spark death; §6's charge paragraph still using most-room collection where [D023](/Hold%20the%20Flood/Brief)/E3 selects player-set shelter priority; the R3 paragraph still calling C2 open; and the competing presentation accounting on Enemies §0.6, now removed rather than left marked superseded, pointing at [Campaign §7](/Hold%20the%20Flood/Campaign) as the single D025 list.
+
+
*(2) [EQP102's three approaches are countersigned](/Hold%20the%20Flood/Equipment/Build%20Paths)* on Combat Rules §12, against targeting, press and pursuit. **All three hold.** Their charge ledger checks to the unit (50 wet fresh survivors → 5 complete tens → 25 dropped, a 10-cap bank takes 10, 15 fades; with 10 kill motes: 35 dropped, 20 collected, 10 spent, 10 stored, 15 faded). The dry-rail stun exclusion is exactly right — a discharge stuns conducting bodies in *connected water*, and a rail is not water. Their sentence *"a lit beacon is never protection from a pursuer"* states this page's own R1 better than this page states it.
+
+
**Two rules their scenes needed and this page did not have, now supplied.** **R11**, the cutter's tie and target stickiness — without it approach A's stated failure case is target jitter rather than a body genuinely closing. **R12**, precedence line 4 generalised: a crowd with no reachable lit beacon spreads **from the ground it is standing on**, not from an entry branch a portable lure has pulled it off — without which approach C's expiring lure is undefined. Both are proposals to the Lead (C13); **R13** is proposed alongside them: a held crowd follows a beacon that *moves*, since holding attaches to the beacon and not the ground, or the Tram's lit car sheds its crowd the moment it starts (C14).
+
+
**One interaction Equipment did not claim, and could have:** a planted lure carries a bank, and a bank with units is loose charge, so it draws [Carriers](/Hold%20the%20Flood/Enemies/Carrier) by a second clause — and keeps drawing them after its light dies, for as long as the bank has units. That is an argument in approach C's favour its author did not make.
+
+
**Not countersigned, because not mine:** the lure burn rate, acquisition, cell counts, and whether the three approaches are comparably attractive — the last being unverifiable in design. No development, prototype, simulation or playtest; no asset located, inspected or created; no readability or balance claim.
+
## CMB101 — current submission, In review
**2026-09-07 · Combat and Enemy Designer.** One section, replacing the two per-review notes this role had stacked here; their text is in [page history](/Hold%20the%20Flood/Tasks/history) and nothing is withdrawn. Submission evidence, not self-acceptance — the CMB101 board row is PM's.
