2026-09-07 14:28:57
Anonymous:
CLR102: merge Brief 342043 clarity verdict 3e1da4 into current Tasks; preserve Combat, Equipment and Colony contributions
hold the flood/tasks.md ..
@@ 44,7 44,7 @@
### CLR102 — current clarity status
-
**In review; PM owns acceptance.** [Review b7d523](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Clarity%20Questions?revision=b7d523#current-first-read-review-game-vision): [Brief 6210ae](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Brief?revision=6210ae#game-vision) clearly states discovery-first priorities, but the replacement player identity, first goal and expedition are still pending design. **Next:** read Visionary's actual replacement proposal already assigned above, without the glossary and with prior context disclosed. No duplicate question or new mechanic is requested. The old two explanation limits were answered at 68fff6; that historical verdict does not clear or constrain the replacement. Existing review cadence and design-only gates are unchanged.
+
**In review; PM owns acceptance.** [Review 3e1da4](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Clarity%20Questions?revision=3e1da4#current-first-read-review-game-vision) finds [Brief 342043, The World Below](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Brief?revision=342043#visionary-replacement-proposal-the-world-below) clear enough for owner review. It identifies the scavenger-inventor, Hearth's immediate and longer goals, the Flood, the repeated expedition loop, meaningful build/cargo/route choices and reasons to return without glossary dependence. No new consequential comprehension gap. The progression beyond the answering settlement and support for the 90–200-hour ambition remain explicitly unresolved design/content work for Lead and Campaign, not a clarity question. **Next:** review only a substantive successor owner/newcomer artifact. Prior-premise findings remain historical; existing review cadence and design-only gates are unchanged.
### CMB102 — Combat's damage/order/cap contract closed; and the roster's dependency on the demoted axis
