2026-09-15 14:52:25
Anonymous:
Record scope response and language journal readability F2.14
hold the flood/design plan.md ..
@@ 30,7 30,11 @@
## Working now: campaign scope
-
[Campaign Scope Choices](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Campaign%20Scope%20Choices) was submitted at 14:38 and is in independent review. It compares 40 rooms with a denser 36-room alternative, naming the discoveries and recovery spaces that move. Systems is stopped for review. The cost allowance needs careful qualification because it predates the added scan mechanism; no smaller scope or revised estimate is selected.
+
[Campaign Scope Choices](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Campaign%20Scope%20Choices) was submitted at 14:38. It compares 40 rooms with a denser 36-room alternative, naming the discoveries and recovery spaces that move. The independent critique is complete. Systems is writing the single response: clearer named player journeys, explicit historical-estimate wording and conditional layout claims. No smaller scope or revised estimate is selected.
+
+
## Working in parallel: the language journal
+
+
The existing [Language And Journal](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Language%20And%20Journal) page is being rewritten around what the player does: capture a clue during an expedition, pause to compare records, make a prediction and try it. The revision preserves the current observation, testimony and historical-route rules while making the pleasure and cost of discovery easier to understand. Temporary editorial support owns this page; a separate reviewer is preparing.
One focused critique and one response belong to each bounded outcome. The outside-edit preservation audit is complete and its factual follow-ups are published; broader readability and design readiness remain open. States and estimates are on [Progress](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Progress).
