2026-09-15 19:50:04
Anonymous:
Close astronaut comparison; record active equipment interaction and forecast
hold the flood/design plan.md ..
@@ 8,7 8,7 @@
The main reading path now begins with [The Game](/Hold%20The%20Flood/The%20Game), follows [three expeditions](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Expedition%20Proposal), returns to [the people aboard](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Coming%20Home), and opens into [discovery in the changing station](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Connecting%20The%20Station). [Hordes and Builds](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Hordes%20and%20Builds) explains the current examples; [Build Comparison](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Build%20Comparison) presents alternative controls and payoffs for owner reaction.
-
Twenty proposal or editorial packages completed review and response today: builds/expeditions, hospital story/survival, regular growth on a renewed route, a second route state after permanent source seals, the six-page reading path, the moving-scan expedition, the short-rescue comparison, the station-completion payoff, the campaign scope comparison, the language journal, the whole-campaign overview, the cast and rescue map, the equipment guide, the Receiver Vault expedition, the enemy guide, the repeated upgrade-choice comparison, the former-patient scene, the first useful invention, four hospital-room descriptions, and the current decision guide. [Combat Rules](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Combat%20Rules) and the room/encounter references describe the two concrete route states. They preserve completed work while giving fresh opposition a physical route. Other seal combinations and shifted layouts remain design work.
+
Twenty-one proposal or editorial packages completed review and response today: builds/expeditions, hospital story/survival, regular growth on a renewed route, a second route state after permanent source seals, the six-page reading path, the moving-scan expedition, the short-rescue comparison, the station-completion payoff, the campaign scope comparison, the language journal, the whole-campaign overview, the cast and rescue map, the equipment guide, the Receiver Vault expedition, the enemy guide, the repeated upgrade-choice comparison, the former-patient scene, the first useful invention, four hospital-room descriptions, the current decision guide, and the astronaut comparison. [Combat Rules](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Combat%20Rules) and the room/encounter references describe the two concrete route states. They preserve completed work while giving fresh opposition a physical route. Other seal combinations and shifted layouts remain design work.
The new Ricochet and Gravity mechanisms remain proposed replacements for parts of the detailed build rules. The [hospital-story alternatives](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Hospital%20Story%20Directions) remain revisable. Completed review does not select them for the owner or establish fun, balance or duration.
@@ 78,9 78,15 @@
[Open Decisions](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Open%20Decisions) completed review, response and integration at **19:23**. The guide now explains the remaining concerns through current examples and distinct alternatives. The original criticism is accounted for; review completion does not turn an example into proof that the criticism is solved. Stale reference questions were removed and the historical shift-comparison link restored. The conflicting proposed explanations for why the aliens abandoned the station remain open.
-
## In review: who is the astronaut?
+
## Ready to compare: who is the astronaut?
-
[Who Is the Astronaut?](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Who%20Is%20the%20Astronaut) presents a repair pilot who wants a settled home and a surveyor who wants someone to share discoveries with. Both respond to the same forced docking, horde breakthrough and optional conversation about Nadi. Their wishes, enjoyment, coping habits and friction with others differ, alongside a cheaper mostly silent alternative. It preserves the player's actions, evidence and pleasure in making a powerful build. The draft arrived at **19:37**. Its author has stopped and the independent reviewer is working from criteria saved before the alternatives. Reviewed comparison target **20:30**, likely **20:00–21:15**.
+
[Who Is the Astronaut?](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Who%20Is%20the%20Astronaut) presents a repair pilot who wants a settled home and a surveyor who wants someone to share discoveries with. Both respond to the same forced docking, horde breakthrough and optional conversation about Nadi. Their wishes, enjoyment, coping habits and friction with others differ, alongside a cheaper mostly silent alternative. It preserves the player's actions, evidence and pleasure in making a powerful build. Review, response and integration completed at **19:47**. One spoken line now makes Nadi's refusal of premature movement clear. Both personalities and the quieter alternative remain available; the risk of intrusive commentary or conversations becoming lessons remains visible.
+
+
## Working now: can a shot carry lightning?
+
+
Systems is extending [Build Comparison](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Build%20Comparison) with two approaches to the same horde: the existing banked-disc/local-arc hybrid and a proposed projectile that delivers electricity at its contact point. The comparison must show a hint, an experiment, a dangerous setup, spectacular success and a bad shot, with the change to discovery afterward. The existing three build directions remain. Any new delivery rule and its cost must be explicit; neither it nor a build priority is selected.
+
+
Systems has received the assignment and is working; independent criteria are ready. Draft target **21:30**, likely **21:00–22:15**; reviewed comparison **22:30**, likely **22:00–23:30**.
The owner has been offered three short existing experiences for reaction: horde climax, coming home and opening. That optional taste feedback can steer priorities while authorized work continues.
