2026-09-14 19:12:58
Anonymous:
Remove text slop: disclaimers, process metadata, restatements and hedge tags; no rule changes (owner readability review, 14 Sep)
hold the flood/clues and help.md ..
@@ 1,8 1,6 @@
# Hold The Horde — Clues and Help
-
**Status:** working proposal. The owner accepted practical clue-based exploration as a direction; this example’s wording, journal/help details and literal language meaning remain proposed. Wall strings may be a language fragment but fulfil no whole-language requirement. Legibility, value and cost remain untested.
-
-
The preferred structure is **physical inference with optional, truthful survivor interpretation**. Comparison can support a reasoned decision; Dorn can clarify it, but neither rescue nor dialogue makes a panel usable.
+
The owner accepted practical clue-based exploration as a direction (see the [Owner Brief](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Brief)). Wall strings may be a language fragment but fulfil no whole-language requirement. The preferred structure is **physical inference with optional, truthful survivor interpretation**. Comparison can support a reasoned decision; Dorn can clarify it, but neither rescue nor dialogue makes a panel usable.
## Four kinds of knowledge
@@ 17,9 15,9 @@
## Recording, pause and persistence
-
Sampling a new angle/state, manipulating evidence and committing a framed record use world time. The record stores that view and location without automatic interpretation. Opening the journal pauses everything, including enemies and oxygen. Paused examination covers stored records and the already-visible frozen view; nothing advances.
+
Sampling a new angle/state, manipulating evidence and committing a framed record all happen while the game runs. The record stores that view and location without automatic interpretation. Opening the journal pauses everything, including enemies and oxygen. Paused examination covers stored records and the already-visible frozen view; nothing advances.
-
Captured records persist on return and through death and revival as knowledge, independently of the owner-required return of carried property. Personal notes may contain observations, quotations, plans or hypotheses; their wording persists without automatic validation. This facsimile example requires no in-game editor. [Language and Journal](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Language%20and%20Journal) proposes comparison and annotation tools.
+
Captured records persist on return and through death and revival as knowledge, independently of the return of carried property. Personal notes may contain observations, quotations, plans or hypotheses; their wording persists without automatic validation. This facsimile example requires no in-game editor. [Language and Journal](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Language%20and%20Journal) proposes comparison and annotation tools.
No record grants hidden permission. Knowledge changes which wall to open and route to budget for; failure gives visible feedback, with remaining options subject to route state, threats and oxygen.
@@ 36,9 34,9 @@
| Non-exhaustive case | Unstringed duct visible through grille; run welded closed | Shows not every duct is marked. It does not by itself disprove “marked walls indicate ducts” or establish original intent. |
| Route use/failure | Stringed panel near jammed door; the door port and a crawl grille both show the same far-side lamp and painted crew name; route beyond the sightline clear, collapsed, welded or sealed | Supports “may bypass the jam,” not known connectivity. Success confirms this route; failure lowers confidence in present operability. |
-
Strings, seams, panels and connections must agree in every visit order. Crawlways plus the visibly non-duct passage support “matching strings identify candidate wall access” more strongly than “strings identify ducts.” Maintenance responsibility remains a real rival, and no builder intent or literal wording is claimed.
+
Strings, seams, panels and connections must agree in every visit order. Crawlways plus the visibly non-duct passage support “matching strings identify candidate wall access” more strongly than “strings identify ducts.” Maintenance responsibility remains a real rival.
-
Each released fastener and a fully moved panel are visible completed checkpoints that persist; cancelling loses only the unfinished stage and spent time/oxygen. Journal pause advances none. The cutter is suit-issued, non-detachable and not exchangeable for a module. The decision is whether a promising crawl justifies world-time work, uncertain traversal, oxygen and exposure versus known door stages or retreat. No tool or capacity rule is added.
+
Each released fastener and a fully moved panel are visible completed checkpoints that persist; cancelling loses only the unfinished stage and spent time/oxygen. The cutter is suit-issued, non-detachable and not exchangeable for a module. The decision is whether a promising crawl justifies work while the game runs, uncertain traversal, oxygen and exposure versus known door stages or retreat.
## Useful survivor interpretation
@@ 48,14 46,14 @@
This is distinct from Dorn's paint. Firsthand use grounds the crew gloss and seam advice. Dorn does not know the wording, whether it names access or maintenance responsibility, or current route condition. He does not choose which crawl is worth the oxygen.
-
Dialogue needs bounded variants:
+
Dialogue needs these variants:
- With no record, Dorn cannot expose an unseen route.
- With one string recorded, he gives the crew term “crawl mark,” his firsthand basis and the actionable suggestion to inspect the panel seam. This is an early optional survivor-led information path.
- With an open-panel record, he confirms the pictured arrangement, not every duct or string.
- With the unmarked duct or a failed access, he distinguishes the routes he used from current conditions; he does not infer historical access from an unexplained blockage and leaves the rival open.
-
Without Dorn, the open crawl, returnable blank wall and non-duct passage support the same candidate-access prediction. This provenance is not every player's experience. In either path the player judges context, spends resources and interprets the outcome. Missed strings recur; records retain breadcrumbs. Collapse or welding makes failure legible but still lowers confidence. The door or retreat remains only if threats and oxygen allow. No path guarantees progress.
+
Without Dorn, the open crawl, returnable blank wall and non-duct passage support the same candidate-access prediction. This provenance is not every player's experience. In either path the player judges context, spends resources and interprets the outcome. Missed strings recur; records retain breadcrumbs. Collapse or welding makes failure clear but still lowers confidence. The door or retreat remains only if threats and oxygen allow. No path guarantees progress.
## Alternative, gates and authoring cost
@@ 63,6 61,9 @@
The strongest alternative makes Dorn's interpretation required. Its exact gate is **Dorn rescued and aboard, with a wall-string record shown in the matching dialogue state, before authored information is sufficient to recognise the crawlway around the jammed door**. That requires the explanatory encounter before this route to the interpretation and could use fewer environmental comparisons, but makes this discovery depend on rescue and a return to the wall.
-
The optional-help policy costs at least three matching string sites, a visibly non-duct connection, panel/seam states, one unstringed duct, one optional unusable marked access, four dialogue conditions, records, failure feedback and reverse-order continuity. Required help may save comparisons but spends dialogue-state and rescue-gate handling. Neither comparison establishes production feasibility, comprehension or fun.
+
The optional-help policy costs at least three matching string sites, a visibly non-duct connection, panel/seam states, one unstringed duct, one optional unusable marked access, four dialogue conditions, records, failure feedback and reverse-order continuity. Required help may save comparisons but spends dialogue-state and rescue-gate handling.
+
+
## Open questions
-
Reopen the preference if readers cannot distinguish evidence from interpretation, optional dialogue merely repeats an already obvious answer, the unaided route depends on pixel hunting, or the required authoring cannot be kept consistent across return and death.
+
- These rules are untested; the example's wording, journal/help details and the literal meaning of the wall strings are proposals.
+
- Reopen the preference if readers cannot distinguish evidence from interpretation, optional dialogue merely repeats an already obvious answer, the unaided route depends on pixel hunting, or the required authoring cannot be kept consistent across return and death.
