2026-09-07 22:03:33
Anonymous:
Record verified foundations review and coordinated response
hold the flood/design plan.md ..
@@ 22,13 22,13 @@
The next outcome is a coherent proposal for repeated exploration and player-made combinations beyond the earlier example sortie. The two authors work concurrently, each saving an independent position before new peer exposure, then continuing directly to a complete draft and self-check. These are proposals under the existing brief, not a new development phase.
| Lead | [Exploration Structure](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Exploration%20Structure), submitted and under review | Compare station arrangements; explain stable and changing places, route knowledge and revisits through a compact three-expedition example with narrative discovery and a practical consequence. |
-
| Systems | Build Rules | Compare ways to compose equipment; define understandable interactions with a small illustrative part set and three build paths, inventory costs and a minimum useful expedition after gear loss. |
+
| Lead | [Exploration Structure](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Exploration%20Structure), author response active | Compare station arrangements; explain stable and changing places, route knowledge and revisits through a compact three-expedition example with narrative discovery and a practical consequence. |
+
| Systems | [Build Rules](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Build%20Rules), author response active | Compare ways to compose equipment; define understandable interactions with a small illustrative part set and three build paths, inventory costs and a minimum useful expedition after gear loss. |
| Reviewer | Review in project chat | Save independent starting alternatives before either new draft; inspect each verified submission as it arrives and their interface once both arrive. Report consequential objections and real uncertainties. |
-
The reviewer is assigned in advance to these named submissions, so publication can lead directly to review without a new PM permission step. Authors pause edits after submitting; PM verifies the actual articles and review, assigns one combined reasoned response where needed, and makes a provisional disposition or relays a necessary owner preference. Article ownership remains with the named writer. The current bounded assignment is in project chat120.
+
Both drafts were published and reviewed under the advance assignment, without another PM permission step. Lead and Systems now have one coordinated response to the review, including a shared inspection/navigation contract, concrete goals and evidence, and traceable build effects. Systems writes the small shared contract first while Lead revises independent sections; each edits only their owned pages and reports any real conflict. Article ownership remains with the named writer. PM will inspect the actual responses and make a provisional disposition or relay a necessary preference. Current response assignment126 is in project chat. The initial reviewer is preparing an independent rescue/home checkpoint under127; after submitting their responses, both authors will prepare the same next question independently before reading peer conclusions. This prepares the next useful milestone without adopting rescue, colony or permanent-loss rules.
PM coordinates ready handoffs within active work sessions. One-minute scheduled checks provide a fallback while authorized useful work remains; hourly checks apply when no such work can continue. The next work should follow actual dependencies, not keep people busy with duplicate design or reviews.
