2026-09-15 13:09:08
Anonymous:
Record combat review, readability work and capacity fallback; forecast F2.6
hold the flood/design plan.md ..
@@ 11,7 11,7 @@
- [Build Comparison](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Build%20Comparison): three builds with different ordinary play, growth, manual specials, physical costs and discoveries using their parts in the station.
- [Expedition Proposal](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Expedition%20Proposal): three successive outings with fresh growth, meaningful hordes, changing objectives and permanent progress.
-
Both proposals completed an independent critique, one response per author and PM checks. They are ready for owner reaction; the new build exceptions still need detailed reconciliation. The [combat growth and renewed route](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Combat%20Rules) also completed review and integration into the room, encounter and survival references. The next concrete case is fresh combat after all four enemy sources on that route are permanently sealed: the player must keep the benefit of the seals and the open shortcut. In parallel, the [hospital-story](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Hospital%20Story%20Directions) and [survival/loadout](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Survival%20And%20Loadout) proposals completed their review and response. They are ready for owner reaction; the alternative story explanations remain revisable. Combat design and its supporting pages continue while the owner chooses which build direction to deepen first. Actual task states and delivery estimates are on [Progress](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Progress).
+
Both proposals completed an independent critique, one response per author and PM checks. They are ready for owner reaction; the new build exceptions still need detailed reconciliation. The [combat growth and renewed route](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Combat%20Rules) also completed review and integration into the room, encounter and survival references. The next concrete case is fresh combat after all four enemy sources on that route are permanently sealed: the player must keep the benefit of the seals and the open shortcut. Its draft and critique are complete; the author is correcting crowd allocation and the order of earned improvements. In parallel, the [hospital-story](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Hospital%20Story%20Directions) and [survival/loadout](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Survival%20And%20Loadout) proposals completed their review and response. They are ready for owner reaction; the alternative story explanations remain revisable. Combat design and its supporting pages continue while the owner chooses which build direction to deepen first. Actual task states and delivery estimates are on [Progress](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Progress).
## What makes a proposal ready
@@ 27,7 27,7 @@
Use [Open Decisions](/Hold%20The%20Flood/Open%20Decisions) as the issue index. Its recommendations remain proposals, and its categories overlap. The team should not wait for fourteen separate owner answers or assume that every criticized rule needs wholesale replacement.
-
The full reading path runs from [The Game](/Hold%20The%20Flood/The%20Game) through an expedition and builds, into the changing station and its discoveries, then home, people and story. Supporting articles will be revised from their current live text, preserving the outside review's useful cleanup.
+
A six-page review and consolidated editorial response are now addressing outdated rules, duplicated recipes and unexplained terms. The main page still needs its older clearing/growth statements corrected; this is confirmed team work, not another owner choice. The full reading path runs from [The Game](/Hold%20The%20Flood/The%20Game) through an expedition and builds, into the changing station and its discoveries, then home, people and story. Supporting articles will be revised from their current live text, preserving the outside review's useful cleanup.
